Urban mobility (UM) represents an increasingly important field in European Union policy agenda. The growing complexity of citizens’ needs and the criticalities related to the global economic downturn have reduced the amount of the public expenditure that can be invested to cover the UM systems’ requirements. From this perspective, private funding is unavoidable. Public-private partnerships are more and more widespread. In particular, we look to a more relevant non-public shareholders’ presence in the ownership structure of urban public-transport companies. Many scholars have investigated the relationship between the presence of non-public shareholders and the economic performance generated by these companies. Nevertheless, less attention is paid to the “intensity” of non-public shareholders’ presence on firm performance. Moreover, cross-country comparisons are infrequently explored.
In light of these considerations, this paper aims to test whether a lesser or higher presence (i.e. the intensity) of non-public shareholders in the ownership structure of the urban public-transport companies can affect economic performance. This research issue is investigated by statistical methodologies focusing on a sample made up by 333 companies operating in 12 European Union countries.
Findings, managerial implications and suggestions for future research are outlined and discussed.
AgranoffR. (2006). Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers. Public Administration Review, 66 (Supplement), 56–65.
3.
AgranoffR. (2008). Enhancing Performance Through Public Sector Networks: Mobilizing Human Capital in Communities of Practice. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(3), 320–347.
4.
AgranoffR., &. McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative Public Management. New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
5.
AhmadN., & BrookinsO.T. (2007). The Impact of Corruption on Efficiency in Developing Economies. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 64–73.
6.
AlchianA.A. (1965). Some economics of property rights. Il Politico. 30, 816–829.
7.
AmaralM., SaussierS., & Yvrande-BillonA. (2009). Auction procedures and competition in public services: The case of urban public transport in France and London. Utilities Policy, 17(2), 166–175.
BishopM., KayJ., & MayerC. (1994). Privatization and Economic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
BlissC., & Di TellaR. (1997). Does Competition Kills Corruption?. The Journal of Political Economy, 105(5), 1001–1023.
16.
BoardmanA.E., & ViningA.R. (1989). Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1–33.
17.
BorgonoviE. (2004). Principi e sistemi aziendali per le amministrazioni pubbliche. Milano: Egea.
BösD. (1991). Privatization: A Theoretical Treatment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20.
BösD., & PetersW. (1991). A principal-agent approach on manager effort and control in privatized and public firms. In OttA.F., & HartleyK. (Eds.). Privatization and Economic Efficiency. A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
21.
BoubakriN., & CossetJ.C. (1998). The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries. Journal of Finance, 53, 1081–1110.
22.
BouckaertG., & HalliganJ. (2008). Managing Performance. International Comparisons. New York: Routledge.
23.
BovairdT. (2004). Public-Private Partnerships: from contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 199–215.
24.
BoyckoM., ShleiferA., & VishnyR.W. (1996). A Theory of Privatisation. Economic Journal, 106, 309–319.
25.
BruniM., & GarzoniA. (1999). Risorse e competenze aziendali nella sostenibilità del vantaggio competitivo. In MollonaE. (Ed.). Strategia a livello di area d'affari. Milano: Egea.
26.
ClaessensS., DjankovS., PohlG. (1997). Ownership and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Czech Republic. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1737.
27.
CoaseR. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
28.
CoatsJ.C. (2002). Applications of principal-agent models to government contracting and accountability decision making. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 441–461.
29.
CodaV. (1990). Le determinanti della redditività operativa. Analisi, previsioni, simulazioni economico-finanziarie d'impresa. Milano: Etaslibri.
30.
CodaV. (2010). Entrepreneurial Values and Strategic Management. Essays in Management Theory. Milano: Bocconi University Press.
31.
Commission of the European Communities (2007). COM(2007) 551. Green Paper. Towards a new culture for urban mobility.
32.
Commission of the European Communities (2009). COM(2009) 490 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Action Plan on Urban Mobility.
33.
Dal BòE., & RossiM.A. (2007). Corruption and inefficiency: Theory and evidence from electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 939–962.
34.
De AlessiL. (1987). Property rights and privatization. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 36(3), 24–35.
35.
DemsetzH (1967). Toward a Theory of Property Rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
36.
DemsetzH. (1988). Ownership, Control and the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
DeWenterK.L., & MalatestaP.H. (2001). State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. American Economic Review, 91(1), 320–334.
38.
DharwadkarB., GeorgeG., & BrandesP. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650–669.
39.
DiewertE. (1978). Hicks' aggregation theorem and the existence of a real value added function. In FussM., & McFaddenD. (Eds.), Production economics: A dual approach to theory and applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
40.
DombergerS., & FernandezP. (1999). Public-Private Partnership for Service Delivery. Business Strategy Review, 10(4), 29–39.
41.
DozY.L., & HamelG. (1998). Alliance Advantage The Art of Creating Value through Partnering. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42.
FamaE. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political and Control, 88(2), 288–309.
43.
FerreroG., DezzaniF., PisoniP., & PudduL. (1998). Le analisi di bilancio. Indici e Flussi. Milano: Giuffrè.
44.
GarzellaS. (2005). Il sistema d'azienda e la valorizzazione delle “potenzialità inespresse”. Una “visione” strategica per il risanamento. Torino: Giappichelli.
45.
GedajlovicE.R., & ShapiroD.M. (1998). Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 533–553.
46.
GirardP., MohrR.D., DellerS.C., & HalsteadJ.M. (2009). Public-Private Partnerships and Cooperative Agreements in Municipal Service Delivery. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(5), 370–392.
47.
GrimseyD., & LewisM.K. (2005). Are Public Private Partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum, 29, 345–378.
48.
GrossmanS.J., & HartO. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719.
HamerE. (1981). Privatisierung als Rationalisierungschance. Hannover: Minden.
51.
HatryH.P. (2006). Performance measurement. Getting Results. Washington: The Urban Institute Press.
52.
HodgeG.A., & GreveC. (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review. Public Adminitration Review, 67(3), 545–558.
53.
HuntingtonS.P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
54.
JensenM., & MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
55.
KaufmannD., KraayA., & MastruzziM. (2009). Governance Matters VIII. Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper n. 4978, June.
56.
KochharR. (1996). Exploring Firm Capital Structure: The Role of Agency Theory vs. Transaction Cost Economics. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 713–728.
57.
KoppenjanJ.F.M. (2005). The formation of public-private partnerships: lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. Public Administration. 83(1), 135–157.
58.
La PortaR., & López-de-SilanesF. (1999). The Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Mexico. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1193–1242.
59.
LaffontJ.J., & TiroleJ. (1993). Privatization and incentives. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7, 84–105.
60.
LawterW.C. (2005). Public-Private Partnerships in Transportation Policy: The Case of Advanced Traveler Information Systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(13–14), 1117–1134.
61.
LeffN.H. (1964). Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption. The American Behavioral Scientist, 8(2), 8–14.
62.
LelandS., & SmirnovaO. (2009). Reassessing Privatization Strategies 25 Years Later: Revisiting Perry and Babitsky's Comparative Performance Study of Urban Bus Transit Services. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 855–867.
63.
LinderS. (1999). Coming to Terms with the Public-Private Partnership: A Grammar of Multiple Meanings. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 35–51.
64.
LuiF.T. (1985). An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery. Journal of. Political Economy, 93(4), 760–81.
65.
MajumdarS.K. (1998). Assessing comparative efficiency of the state-owned mixed and private sectors in Indian industry. Public Choice, 96, 1–24.
66.
MarsilioM. (2009). Le partnership pubblico-privato per il finanziamento e la gestione di infrastrutture pubbliche. In BorgonoviE., FattoreG., & LongoG. (Eds.). Management delle istituzioni pubbliche. Milano: Egea.
67.
MartinM.H., & HalachmiA. (2012). Public-Private Partnerships in Global Health: Addressing Issues of Public Accountability, Risk Management and Governance. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 189–237.
68.
MauroP. (1995). Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.
69.
McGuireR.A., & Van CottT.N. (1984). Public versus private economic activity: a new look at school bus transportation. Public Choice, 43(1), 25–43.
70.
MeneguzzoM., & CepikuD. (2006). L'esternalizzazione: strategia e strumenti. In VetrittoG. (Ed.). L'esternalizzazione strategica nelle amministrazioni pubbliche. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
71.
MoP.H. (2001). Corruption and Economic Growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 66–79.
72.
MoeR.C. (1996). Managing Privatization: A New Challenge to Public Administration. In Guy PetersB., & RockmanB.A. (Eds.), Agenda for Excellence 2: Administering the State. Chatham: Chatham House.
73.
MolanoW.T. (2000). The lesson of privatization. International Journal of Public Administration. 23(5–8), 737–752.
74.
MonteduroF. (2010). Apertura al capitale privato e performance economiche. Un'analisi empirica nelle imprese di servizio pubblico locale. Azienda Pubblica, 23(4), 487–506.
75.
MooreM.H. (1995). Creating public value: strategic management in government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
76.
MussariR. (2001). Carta dei Servizi ed autonomia degli Enti Locali: un'armonia da ricercare. Azienda Pubblica, 14(5), 515–540.
77.
MussariR. (2005). L'oggetto dell'indagine: il concetto di esternalizzazione nelle amministrazioni pubbliche. In D'AutiliaM.L., & ZamaroN. (Eds.). Le esternalizzazioni nelle amministrazioni pubbliche Indagine sulla diffusione delle pratiche di outsourcing. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
78.
OelertW. (1976). Reprivatisierung des öffentlichen personalverkehrs. Der Personenverkehr, 4, 108–114.
79.
OsborneD., & GaeblerT. (1993). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
80.
PalmerJ., QuinnJ., & ResendesR. (1983). A case study of public enterprise: Gray Coach Lines Ltd. In PrichardJ.R.S. (Ed.). Crown Corporations in Canada: The Calculus of Instrument Choice. Toronto: Butterworths.
81.
PashigianB.P. (1976). Consequences and causes of public ownership of urban transit facilities. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1239–1259.
82.
PerryJ.L., & BabitskyT.T. (1986). Comparative performance in urban bus transit: Assessing privatization strategies. Public Administration Review, 46(1), 57–66.
83.
PoisterT.H. (2003). Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
84.
PollittC. (1993). Managerialism and Public Services, Oxford: Blackwell.
85.
PollittC., & BouckaertG. (2000). Public Management Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86.
PrahaladC.K., & HamelG. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 78–90.
87.
RadaelliC.M. (2005). How context matters: regulatory quality in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 924–943.
88.
RosenbloomD.H., & PiotrowskiS.J. (2005). Outsourcing the Constitution and Administrative Law Norms. American Review of Public Administration, 35(2), 103–121.
89.
SappingtonD.E., & StiglitzJ.E. (1987). Privatization, Information and Incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6, 567–82.
90.
SavasE.S. (2000). Opportunities in Privatization and Public- Private Partnerships, New York: Chatham House Publishers.
91.
SchmidtK.M. (1996a). The Costs and Benefits of Privatization: An Incomplete Contracts Approach. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 12(1), 1–24.
92.
SchmidtK.M. (1996b). Incomplete Contracts and Privatization. European Economic Review, 40, 569–79.
93.
ShapiroC., & WilligR.D. (1990). Economic Rationales for the Scope of Privatization. In SuleimanE.N., & WaterburyJ. (Eds.). Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization. London: Westview Press.
94.
ShleiferA. (1998). State versus Private Ownership. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133–150.
95.
SuleimanE.N., & WaterburyJ. (Eds.) (1990). Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization. London: Westview Press.
96.
TanziV., & DavoodiH. (1997). Corruption, public investment and growth. IMF Working Paper, 139, 1997.
TeismanG., & KlijnE.H. (2002). Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme?. Public Amdinistration Review, 62(2), 197–205.
99.
United Nations (2011). Word Urbanization Prospects, the 2011 Revision.
100.
Vaillancourt RosenauP. (2000). Public-Private Policy Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101.
ValottiG. (2005). Management pubblico. Temi per il cambiamento. Milano: Egea.
102.
Van DoorenW., BouckaertG., & HalliganJ. (2010), Performance management in the public sector, New York: Routledge.
103.
Van GestelK., VoetsJ., & VerhoestK. (2012). How Governance Of Complex PPPs Affects Performance. Public Administration Quarterly. 36(2), 140–188.
104.
VillalongaB. (2000). Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42, 43–74.
105.
WalshK. (1995). Public services and Market Mechanisms: Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management. London: Macmillan.
106.
YoungM.N., PengM.W., AhlstromD., BrutonG.D., & JiangY. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220.
