Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-4
Finding “Improvement” in the Language Transportation Planners Use: A Critical Discourse Analysis to Illustrate an Automobile-Centric Bias in Transportation Policymaking
This research considers the urban planning situations in which transportation planners implicitly or explicitly use the term “improvement.” To answer our research questions—what do planners and policymakers mean by improvement, and how do these improvements challenge or reinforce car-centered transportation planning—we conducted a discourse analysis on documents from 50 cities, counties, and state departments of transportation. Using a critical discourse analysis, we find that perceptions about what is a transportation infrastructure “improvement” reveals policymakers’ and planners’ situatedness, defines for themselves and the public they serve “correct” travel methods, and upholds the car-centric status quo in the United States.
BergB. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Publishing.
2.
BergerP.LuckmannT. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (No. 10). London, England: Penguin Press.
3.
BoschkenH. (2002). Social class, politics, and urban markets: The makings of bias in policy outcomes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
BoussauwK.VanoutriveT. (2017). Transport policy in Belgium: Translating sustainability discourses into unsustainable outcomes. Transport Policy, 53, 11-19.
5.
BullardR. D. (2003). New routes to transportation equity: Why race still matters. Transportation Equity: A Newsletter of the Environmental Justice Resource Center at Clark Atlanta University, 6(1).
6.
BullardR. D.JohnsonG.TorresA. (2000). Dismantling transportation apartheid: The quest for equity. In BullardR.JohnsonG.TorresA. (Eds.), Sprawl city: Race, politics, and planning in Atlanta (pp. 59-68). Washington, DC: Island Press.
7.
ChiltonP.SchaffnerC. (2002). Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In ChiltonP.SchaffnerC. (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1-44). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
CliftonK.LucasK. (2006). Examining the empirical evidence of transport ine quality in the US and UK. In LucasK. (Ed.), Running on empty (pp. 15-36). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
10.
DekaD. (2004). Social and environmental justice issues in urban transportation. In HansonS.GiulianoG. (Eds.), The geography of urban transportation (3rd ed., pp. 332-355). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
11.
DomoshM.SeagerJ. (2001). Putting women in place: Feminist geographies make sense of the world. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
12.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press: Cambridge, MA.
13.
FarringtonJ.FarringtonC. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 1-12.
14.
FriedmannJ. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
GarrettM.TaylorB. (1999). Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13, 6-27.
16.
GunderM. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory, 9, 298-314.
17.
HananelR.BerechmanJ. (2016). Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach. Transport Policy, 49, 78-85.
18.
HansonS. (1995). Getting there: Urban transportation in context. In HansonS. (Ed.), The geography of urban transportation (2nd ed., pp. 3-25). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
19.
HealeyP. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2, 101-123.
20.
HealeyP. (2015). Planning theory: The good city and its governance. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 18, pp. 202-207). London, England: Elsevier.
KenyonS.RaffertyJ.LyonsG. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 207-219.
24.
LeeR. J.SenerI. N.JonesS. N. (2017). Understanding the role of equity in active transportation planning in the United States. Transport Reviews, 37, 211-226.
25.
LitmanT. (2007). Evaluating transportation equity. World Transport Policy & Practice, 8(2), 50-65.
26.
LoweK. (2016). Environmental justice and pedestrianism: Sidewalk continuity, race, and poverty in New Orleans, Louisiana. Transportation Research Record, 2598, 119-123.
27.
LucasK. (2004). Locating transport as a social policy problem. In LucasK. (Ed.), Running on empty (pp. 7-14). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
28.
LutzC.FernandezA. L. (2010). Carjacked: The culture of the automobile and its effect on our lives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
ManaughK.BadamiM. G.El-GeneidyA. M. (2015). Integrating social equity into urban transportation planning: A critical evaluation of equity objectives and measures in transportation plans in North America. Transport Policy, 37, 167-176.
30.
MartensK. (2006). Basing transportation planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19(1), 1-17.
31.
MartensK. (2011). Substance precedes methodology: On cost-benefit analysis and equity. Transportation, 38, 959.
32.
MartensK. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer’s “Spheres of Justice” to the transport sector. Transportation, 39, 1035-1053.
33.
MartensK.GolubA.RobinsonG. (2012). A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 684-695.
34.
MillerH. J.WitloxF.TribbyC. P. (2013). Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: A measurement framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 51-64.
NewmanP.KenworthyJ. (2000). The ten myths of automobile dependence. World Transport Policy & Practice, 6, 15-25.
37.
NikanderP. (2008). Constructionism and discourse analysis. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 413-428). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
38.
PortugaliJ.AlfasiN. (2008). An approach to planning discourse analysis. Urban Studies, 45, 251-272.
RotheJ. (2008). Driven to kill: Vehicles as weapons. Edmonton, Canada: The University of Alberta Press.
41.
RydinY. (1998). The enabling local state and urban development: Resources, rhetoric and planning in East London. Urban Studies, 35, 175-191.
42.
SanchezT. W.StolzR.MaJ. S. (2003). Moving to equity: Addressing inequitable effects of transportation policies on minorities. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
43.
SchweitzerL.ValenzueleaJ. (2004). Environmental injustice and transportation: The claims and the evidence. The Journal of Planning Literature, 18, 383-398.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
TitshcerS.MeyerM.WodakR.VetterE. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
47.
UretaS. (2008). To move or not to move? Social exclusion, accessibility and daily mobility among the low-income population in Santiago, Chile. Mobilities, 3(2), 26-289.
48.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2004). National household travel survey, 2001. Summary of Travel Trends. Retrieved from http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/pub/STT.pdf
49.
Van DijkT. (1993). Analyzing racism through discourse analysis. In StanfieldJ.DennisR. (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 92-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
Van DijkT. (1997). Principles of critical discourse analysis. In WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 300-317). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51.
WalkerJ. (2012). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Washington, DC: Island Press.
52.
WillsonR. (2001). Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning Paradigm. Transportation, 28, 1-31.
