American Society for Public Administration (1995). PATimes20 (1).
2.
AmmonsD.N. (1995). "Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement in Local Government: The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services." Public Administration Review55(l): 37–47.
3.
AmmonsD.N. ((1994). "The Role of Professional Associations in Establishing and Promoting Performance Standards for Local Government." Public Productivity and Management Review17(3)281–299.
4.
AmmonsD.N. ((1992). "Productivity Barriers in the Public Sector," in HolzerM. (ed). Public Productivity Handbook.New York: Marcel Dekker.
5.
AmmonsD.N. ((1985). "Common Barriers to Productivity Improvement in Local Government." Public Productivity Review7(2)293–310.
6.
AristiguetaM. (1999). Managing for Results in State Government.Westport, CN: Quorum.
7.
BalkW.L., BouckaertG., and BronnerK.M. (1989). "Notes on the Theory and Practice of Government Productivity Improvement." Public Productivity and Management Review13(2)117–131.
8.
BehnR. (1998). "What Right Do Public Managers Have to Lead?" Public Administration Review58(3)209–224.
9.
BouckaertG. (1993). "Measurement and Meaningful Management." Public Productivity and Management Review17(1)31–44.
10.
BrownR.E.and PyersJ.B. (1988). "Putting Teeth into the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public Services." Public Administration Review48(3)735–733.
11.
CarrollJ.D. (1995). "The Rhetoric of Reform and Political Reality in the National Performance Review." Public Administration Review55(3)302–311.
12.
CookB. (1998). "Politics, Political Leadership, and Public Management." Public Administration Review58(3)225–230.
13.
DaftR.L. (1978). "A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation." Academy of Management Review21(2)193–210.
14.
DeutschK. (1985). "On Theory and Research Innovation," in MerrittR.L. and MerrittA.J. (eds.). Innovation in the Public Sector.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
EpsteinP.D. (1992). "Measuring the Performance of Public Services," in HolzerM. (ed). Public Productivity Handbook.New York: Marcel Dekker.
16.
FredericksonH.G. (2000). "Measuring Performance in Theory and Practice." PATimes23(8)8–9.
17.
GabrisG.T. (1986). "Recognizing Management Technique Dysfunctions: How Management Tools Often Cause More Problems than They Solve." Public Productivity and Management Review40:3–19.
18.
GreinerJ.M. (1996). "Positioning Performance Measurement for the Twenty-First Century," in HalachmiA. and BouckaertG. (eds.). Organizational Performance and Measurement in the Public Sector.Westport, CN: Quorum.
19.
GrizzleG.A. (1985). "Performance Measures for Budget Justifications: Developing a Selection Strategy." Public Productivity Review 10 (Sprmg):33–44.
20.
HalachmiA.and BouckaertG. (eds.). (1996). Organizational Performance Measurement in the Public Sector.Westport, CN: Quorum.
21.
HatryHP. . (1979). Efficiency Measurement for Local Government Services: Some Initial Suggestions.Washington, DC: Urban Institute and ICMA.
22.
HatryHP. . (1974). Measuring the Effectiveness of Basic Municipal Service.Washington D.C.:Urban Institute.
23.
HatryH.P.and FiskD. (1971). Improving Productivity and Productivity Measurement in Local Government.Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
24.
JunJ.S.and GrossV. (1996). "Tool Tropism in Public Administration: The Pathology of Management Fads." Administrative Theory and Praxis18(2)108–118.
25.
KelleyJ.T. (1984). Costing Government Services: A Guide for Decision Makers.Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
26.
KlimanA.J.and FisherL. (1995). "Budget Reform Proposals in the NPR Report." Public Budgeting and Finance 15(l):27–38.
27.
KravchukR.S.and SchackR.W. (1996). "Designing Effective Performance: Measurement Systems Under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993." Public Administration Review56(4)348–358.
28.
MascarenhasR.C. (1996). "Searching for Efficiency in the Public Sector: Interim Evaluation of Performance Budgeting in New Zealand." Public Budgeting and Finance16(3)13–27.
29.
MilakovichM.E. (1992). "Total Quality Management for Public Service Productivity Improvement." in HolzerM. (ed.). Public Productivity Handbook.New York: Marcel Dekker.
30.
National Performance Review, Executive Office of the President (1993). Front Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less.Washington D.C.:Government Printing Office.
31.
NyhanR.C.and MarloweH.A. (1995). "Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Challenges and Opportunities." Public Productivity and Management Review18(2)333–348.
PerrowC. (1986). Complex Organizations, 3rd ed. New York: Random House.
35.
RidleyC. (1927). Measuring Municipal Activities: A Survey of Suggested Criteria and Forms for Appraising Administration.Chicago:ICMA.
36.
RodriguezJ. (1996). "Connecting Resources and Results." Newsletter of the Section on Public Budgeting and Finance (Winter):3–5.
37.
RubinIS. (1996). "Budgeting for Accountability: Municipal Budgeting in the 1990s." Public Budgeting and Finance16(2)112–132.
38.
SchedlerK. "Performance Measurement in a Direct Democratic Environment: Local Government Reforms In Switzerland." Public Budgeting and Finance14(4)36–53.
39.
TerryL. (1998). "Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement." Public Administration Review58(3)194–200.
40.
WholeyJ.S.and HatryJ.P. (1992). "The Case for Performance Monitoring." Public Administration Review52(6)604–610.