This study addresses the failure risk of carbon fiber reinforced polymer cable anchorage systems during bridge deck tanker fires. Through numerical simulation, the most unfavorable temperature-rise curve was established. Experimental validation assessed the temperature response of the load transfer medium and the protective efficacy of three types of fire-resistant materials. Results indicate that at 2 m/s wind speed, the most hazardous thermal profile occurs 1 m directly above the tanker’s roof surface. Epoxy-based load transfer medium presents anchoring failure risks beyond 123°C, with temperature gradient attenuation dependent on material thermal properties. Comparative analysis indicates that the fireproof coating-insulating cement composite system provides superior protection compared with single-layer high-silica needle-punched felt. To ensure the carbon fiber reinforced polymer anchoring system maintains 3-h fire resistance integrity, the minimum protective configuration requires either 300-mm high-silica felt, 75-mm insulating cement, or a 2.38-mm fireproof coating.
GarlockMPaya-ZafortezaIKodurV, et al. Fire hazard in bridges: review, assessment and repair strategies. Eng Struct2012; 35: 89–98.
5.
HarikIEShaabanAMGesundH, et al. United States bridge failures, 1951–1988. J Perform Constr Facil1990; 4: 272–277.
6.
ScheerJ.Failed bridges: case studies, causes and consequences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
7.
WardhanaKHadiprionoFC.Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States. J Perform Constr Facil2003; 17: 144–150.
8.
WrightWLattimerBWoodworthM, et al. Highway bridge fire hazard assessment draft final report. TRB Project, Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, September2013.
FirmoJPRoquetteMGCorreiaJR, et al. Influence of elevated temperatures on epoxy adhesive used in CFRP strengthening systems for civil engineering applications. Int J Adhes Adhes2019; 93: 102333.
11.
ChaudharyATiwariMKGuptaA, et al. Experimental study on burning behavior of crude karanja oil pool fire. Heat Transf Res2021; 52: 25–45.
12.
ZhaoJWangSZhangJ, et al. Experimental study on the burning characteristics of transformer oil pool fires. Energy Fuels2020; 34: 4967–4976.
13.
DongWDalinZYulongD, et al. Experimental study on combustion velocity of oil tank fire. Combust Sci Technol2005; 11: 286–291.
14.
KongDYangHHeX.Impact of wind on in-situ burning behavior of spilled oil on open water. J Loss Prev Process Ind2020; 65: 104147.
15.
LiuXZhuGPanR, et al. Experimental study on flame length of sidewall fire with different aspect ratios and orientations in an arched tunnel. Fire Technol2022; 58: 3577–3596.
16.
WangJWangMYuX, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the fire behavior of a tank with oil leaking and burning. Process Saf Environ Prot2022; 159: 1203–1214.
17.
Planas-CuchiEChatrisJMLópezC, et al. Determination of flame emissivity in hydrocarbon pool fires using infrared thermography. Fire Technol2003; 39: 261–273.
18.
DuYSunYJiangJ, et al. Effect of cavity radiation on transient temperature distribution in steel cables under ISO834 fire. Fire Saf J2019; 104: 79–89.
19.
SloaneMJDBettiR.Heat transfer on a disk: a closed-form solution for suspension bridge’s main cables exposed to fire. J Eng Mech2019; 145: 4019004.
20.
SongCZhangGHouW, et al. Performance of prestressed concrete box bridge girders under hydrocarbon fire exposure. Adv Struct Eng2020; 23: 1521–1533.
21.
TonicelloEDesanghereSVassartO, et al. Fire analysis of a new steel bridge. In: 7th International conference on structures in FireETH Zürich, Zürich, 6–8 June 2012.
22.
ZhangGKodurVXieJ, et al. Behavior of prestressed concrete box bridge girders under hydrocarbon fire condition. Procedia Eng2017; 210: 449–455.
23.
HuJUsmaniASanadA, et al. Fire resistance of composite steel & concrete highway bridges. J Constr Steel Res2018; 148: 707–719.
24.
Peris-SayolGPaya-ZafortezaIAlós-MoyaJ, et al. Analysis of the influence of geometric, modeling and environmental parameters on the fire response of steel bridges subjected to realistic fire scenarios. Comput Struct2015; 158: 333–345.
25.
LiuZ.Investigation of fire response for steel bridges using coupled CFD–FEM method. Nanjing, China: Southeast University, 2021.
26.
LiuZSilvaJCGHuangQ, et al. Coupled CFD–FEM simulation methodology for fire-exposed bridges. J Bridge Eng2021; 26: 4021074.
27.
NobleCRWemhoffAPMcmichaelLD.Thermal-structural analysis of the MacArthur maze freeway collapse. In: ASME 2008 Summer Heat Transfer Conference (HT2008), Jacksonville, Florida, USA, 10–14 August, 2008, New York, NY, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp. 511–519.
28.
CuiCChenAMaR.Stability assessment of a suspension bridge considering the tanker fire nearby steel-pylon. J Constr Steel Res2020; 172: 106186.
29.
Alos-MoyaJPaya-ZafortezaIGarlockMEM, et al. Analysis of a bridge failure due to fire using computational fluid dynamics and finite element models. Eng Struct2014; 68: 96–110.
30.
MaRCuiCMaM, et al. Numerical simulation and simplified model of vehicle-induced bridge deck fire in the full-open environment considering wind effect. Struct Infrastruct Eng2021; 17: 1698–1709.
31.
SongCZhangGKodurV, et al. Fire response of horizontally curved continuous composite bridge girders. J Constr Steel Res2021; 182: 106671.
32.
HeskestadG.Luminous heights of turbulent diffusion flames. Fire Saf J1983; 5: 103–108.
33.
ThomasPH.The size of flames from natural fires. In: Symposium (international) on combustion, Ithaca, New York, USA, 27 August-1 September 1962, pp. 844–859. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
34.
MudanKS.Thermal radiation hazards from hydrocarbon pool fires. Prog Energy Combust Sci1984; 10: 59–80.
35.
ShokriMBeylerCL.Radiation from large pool fires. J Fire Prot Eng1989; 1: 141–149.
36.
WuXHuangTAuFTK, et al. A localized fire model for predicting the surface temperature of box girder bridges subjected to tanker truck fire. Fire Technol2020; 56: 2059–2087.
37.
WakamatsuT.Experimental study on the heating mechanism of a steel beam exposed to a localized fire. In: Proceedings, Interflam’96 Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom,1996, pp. 509–518. London, United Kingdom: Interscience Communications Ltd.
38.
ZouYQinLSunL, et al. Fire and blast protection for multi-strand stay cables of rod El Farag Axis bridge. Struct Eng Int2023; 33: 179–182.
39.
MaMLMaRJChenAR.Safety of cables and full structure of a cable-stayed bridge exposed to fires on deck. J South China Univ Technol2014; 42: 117–124.
40.
LiuZLiG.Performance of steel cable-stayed bridges in ship fires, part I: numerical method and baseline fire scenario study. J Constr Steel Res2023; 210: 108090.
41.
KodurVAzizEDwaikatM.Evaluating fire resistance of steel girders in bridges. J Bridge Eng2013; 18: 633–643.
42.
YangYYangWZhangZ, et al. Fire-resistant test and fire protection layer research of u-shaped steel–concrete composite beams. Structures2023; 58: 105340.
43.
DongKHuKGaoW, et al. Fire endurance tests of CFRP-strengthened RC beams with different insulation schemes. Structures2023; 56: 104887.
44.
ZhugePTaoGWangB, et al. Effects of high temperatures on the performance of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite cables protected with fire-retardant materials. Materials (Basel)2022; 15: 4696.
45.
ShengliLXiaobinL.FDS fire numerical simulation. 1st ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, p. 251.
46.
LeiteRMCentenoFR.Effect of tank diameter on thermal behavior of gasoline and diesel storage tanks fires. J Hazard Mater2018; 342: 544–552.
47.
OkaYSugawaOImamuraT, et al. Effect of cross-winds to apparent flame height and tilt angle from several kinds of fire source. Fire Saf Sci2003; 7: 915–926.
48.
HuLLiuSde RisJL, et al. A new mathematical quantification of wind-blown flame tilt angle of hydrocarbon pool fires with a new global correlation model. Fuel (Lond)2013; 106: 730–736.
49.
ChenK.Study on combustion rate, thermal feedback mechanism and radiation characteristics of pool fire under the influence of ambient wind. Doctor, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, 2019.
50.
MuñozMArnaldosJCasalJ, et al. Analysis of the geometric and radiative characteristics of hydrocarbon pool fires. Combust Flame2004; 139: 263–277.
51.
HobhouseLT.Some experimental results. In: HobhouseLT (ed.) Mind in evolution. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan and Co, 1915, pp. 186–254.
52.
DinennoPJ.SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 2002, Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and Bethesda, MD, USA: Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), pp. 2–246.
53.
WeckmanEJStrongAB.Experimental investigation of the turbulence structure of medium-scale methanol pool fires. Combust Flame1996; 105: 245–266.
54.
TiantianT.Study on the behavior of rectangular fire under different constraints. Hefei, China: University of Science and Technology of China, 2021.
55.
ZhugePYuYCaiCS, et al. Mechanical behavior and optimal design method for innovative CFRP cable anchor. J Compos Constr2019; 23: 4018067.
56.
JinsongZYangW.Redundancy analysis of long-span suspension bridges based on the importance of slings. J Chongqing Jiaotong Univ2017; 36: 1–6.
