The effect of fire or heat and the associated fire hazards of South African hardwoods had been minimally researched. Quantitative investigations on fire performances of selected and common South African hardwood species that include Leadwood (Combretum imberbe), Mopani (Colophospermum mopane), Tamboti (Spirostachys Africana), Stinkwood (ocotea bullata), and Real Yellowwood (Podocarpus latifolius) were undertaken using the cone calorimeter and the thermal gravimetric analysis instrument. The results indicated that Leadwood has the superior thermal performance. It has the lowest peak heat release rate (first peak at 156 kW/m2) at external heat irradiation flux of 75 kW/m2, highest thermal response parameter (376.2 kW s1/2/m2), highest thermal inertial (11.5 kW2 s/K2 m4), highest , lowest fire growth index (derived from first heat release rate peak at 3120 W/s) and lowest smoke growth index (derived from first smoke production rate peaks at 0.760 m2/s2), and lowest smoke release (toxicity) 446.5 kg/kg. Bad thermal performance wood species are Mopani and Real Yellowwood. Stinkwood on the other hand has the best thermal stability from activation energy measurements.
ZhaoHYangJ-RXuH, et al. Pseudogenization of the umami taste receptor gene Tas1r1 in the giant panda coincided with its dietary switch to bamboo. Mol Biol Evol2010; 27(12): 2669–2673.
7.
ExatasCCTecnologiaN.Assessment of the thermal behavior of lignins from softwood and hardwood species. Report, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), Bento Gonçalves, Brazil, 2017.
8.
IgazRKrišťákLRužiakI, et al. Thermophysical properties of OSB boards versus equilibrium moisture content. Bio Resources2017; 12(4): 8106–8118.
9.
ZhugeJ.Fire retardant nano-composites: materials design and thermal degradation modelling. PhD thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 2012.
10.
QuintiereJG.Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Chichester: John Wiley, 2006, pp. 171–180.
11.
DelichatsiosMA.Ignition times for thermally thick and intermediate conditions in flat and cylindrical geometries. In Fire safety science: proceedings of the sixth international symposium, Poitiers, France, 5–9 July 1999, pp. 233–244.
12.
DaoDRLucheJRichardF, et al. Determination of characteristics parameters for the thermal decomposition of epoxy resin/carbon fibre composites in cone calorimeter. Int J Hydro Energy2013; 38: 8167–8178.
13.
SpearpointMJQuintiereJG, Predicting the ignition of wood in the Cone Calorimeter - effect of species, grain orientation and heat flux. Fire Safety Journ2001; 36/4: 391–415.
14.
HakkarainenTHayashiY.Comparison of Japanese and European fire classification systems for surface linings. Fire Sci Tech2001; 21(1): 19–42.
15.
TsantaridisLÖstmanB.Cone calorimeter data and comparisons for the SBI RR products. Trätek Repport I 9812090, DiVA, Stockholm, 1998.
16.
HorrocksAR.Textile flammability research since 1980 – personal challenges and partial solutions. Polym Degrad Stabil2013; 98(12): 2813–2824.
17.
EnescuDAlongiJFracheA.Evaluation of nonconventional additives as fire retardants on polyamide 6,6: phosphorous-based master batch, α-zirconium dihydrogen phosphate, and β-cyclodextrin based nanosponges. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 123: 3545–3555.
18.
TenWoldeAMcNattJKrahnL.Thermal properties of wood and wood panel products for use in buildings. USDA Forest Products Laboratory Report for Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL/Sub/87-21697/1, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, 1988.
19.
LiuRMorrellJJYanL.Glycerol impregnated poplar. Bio Resources2018; 13(1): 1563–1575.
20.
TripathiGSrivastavaD.Study on the effect of carboxyl terminated butadiene acrylonitrile (CTBN) copolymer concentration on the decomposition kinetics parameters of blends of glycidyl epoxy and non-glycidyl epoxy resin. Inter J Organic Chem2011; 1: 105–112.
21.
VyazovkinSLesnikovichA.Estimation of the pre-exponential factor in the isoconversional calculation of effective kinetic parameters. Thermochim Acta1988; 128: 297–300.
22.
LeeBHKimHSKimS, et al. Evaluating the flammability of wood based panels and gypsum particleboard using a cone calorimeter. Constr Build Mater2011; 25(7): 3044–3050.
23.
SeoHJKimSHuhW, et al. Enhancing the flame retardant performance of wood based materials using carbon based materials. J Therm Anal Calorim2015; 119(3): 1–8.
24.
GrexaOLubkeH.Flammability parameter of wood tested on a cone calorimeter. Polym Degrad Stabil2001; 74(3): 427–432.
LiB.Influence of polymer additives on thermal decomposition and smoke emission of poly (vinyl chloride). Polym Degrad Stab2003; 82(3): 467–476.
27.
ÖstmanB.Euroclasses for the reaction to fire of wood-based panels. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European wood-based panel symposium, Hannover, September, 2001.
28.
LaguelaSBisonPPeronF, et al. Thermal conductivity measurements on wood materials with transient plane source technique. Thermochim Acta2015; 600: 45–51.
29.
TrouveAMinnicTE.Thermal properties database. Final technical report submitted to U.S. Department of Justice 2008-DN-BX-K167, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, 2012.
30.
AniszewskaMGendekA.Comparison of heat of combustion and calorific value of the cones and wood of selected forest trees species. For Res Paper2014; 75(3): 231–236.
31.
GulSShahAABilalS.Calculation of activation energy of degradation of polyaniline-dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid salts via TGA. J Sci Innov Res2013; 2(3): 673–684.
32.
PolettoM.Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study of pine wood pyrolysis. Brazilian J Wood Sci2016; 7(2): 111–118.
33.
SlopieckaKBartocciPFantozziF.Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study of poplar wood pyrolysis. Appl Energy2012; 97: 491–497.
