Usually, the constant heat flux is used in the previous studies of polymeric pyrolysis. However, the ramped heat flux may be more realistic under a fire condition. For further understandings of polymer pyrolysis in the early stage of fire, the influences of ramped heat flux on pyrolysis of poly(methyl methacrylate) were experimentally and theoretically investigated. Linearly and quadratically ramped heat fluxes were controlled by the output power of a radiative heater. Surface temperature, mass loss rate, and ignition time were experimentally obtained to explore the thermochemical stability of poly(methyl methacrylate) under ramped heat fluxes. A one-dimensional model was used to predict the pyrolysis process, where kinetic parameters were evaluated by a genetic algorithm. Finally, ignition criteria including critical surface temperature and critical mass loss rate were revisited. We observed that the two ignition criteria give similar ignition time when the heat flux increases fast.
BalNReinG.Numerical investigation of the ignition delay time of a translucent solid at high radiant heat fluxes. Combust Flame2011; 158: 1109–1116.
2.
GironNHCelinaMC.High temperature polymer degradation: rapid IR flow-through method for volatile quantification. Polym Degrad Stabil2017; 145: 93–101.
3.
Pérez-MaquedaLASánchez-JiménezaPEPerejónaAet al. Scission kinetic model for the prediction of polymer pyrolysis curves from chain structure. Polym Test2014; 37: 1–5.
4.
DiDomizioMJMulherinPWeckmanEJ.Ignition of wood under time-varying radiant exposures. Fire Safety J2016; 82: 131–144.
5.
BilbaoRMastralJFLanaJA.A model for the prediction of the thermal degradation and ignition of wood under constant and variable heat flux. J Anal Appl Pyrol2002; 62: 63–82.
6.
VermesiIRoennerNPironiPet al. Pyrolysis and ignition of a polymer by transient irradiation. Combust Flame2016; 163: 31–41.
7.
BelcherCHaddenRReinGet al. An experimental assessment of the ignition of forest fuels by the thermal pulse generated by the Cretaceous-Paleogene impact at Chicxulub. J Geol Soc2015; 172: 175–185.
8.
YangLGuoZZhouYet al. The influence of different external heating ways on pyrolysis and spontaneous ignition of some woods. J Anal Appl Pyrol2007; 78: 40–45.
9.
YangLGuoZJiJet al. Experimental study on spontaneous ignition of wood exposed to variable heat flux. J Fire Sci2005; 23: 405–416.
10.
JiJHaoYWangY.On the comprehensive auto-ignition mechanism for wooden material under linearly increasing heat-flux. J Saf Environ2009; 9: 116–120 (in Chinese).
11.
ReszkaPBorowiecPSteinhausTet al. A methodology for the estimation of ignition delay times in forest fire modeling. Combust Flame2012; 159: 3652–3657.
12.
ManzelloSParkSClearyT.Development of rapidly deployable instrumentation packages for data acquisition in wildland–urban interface (WUI) fires. Fire Safety J2010; 45: 327–336.
13.
CohenJ.Relating flame radiation to home ignition using modeling and experimental crown fires. Can J Forest Res2004; 34: 1616–1626.
14.
LamorletteA.Analytical modeling of solid material ignition under a radiant heat flux coming from a spreading fire front. J Therm Sci Eng Appl2014; 6: 1–4.
15.
HeskestadG.Engineering relations for fire plumes (SFPE technology report). Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1982; 8: 2–8.
16.
ObachMRWeckmanEJ.Comparing the heat release rate and heat flux of uniformly constructed wood cribs. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Technical Meeting, Ottawa, Canada, 9–12 May 2010, pp. 202207. Combustion Institute—Canadian Section.
17.
ToreroJL.Flaming ignition of solid fuels. In: HurleyMJGottukDTHallJRJr.et al. (eds) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 4th ed.National Fire Protection Association, 2008, pp. 633–661.
18.
LyonREQuintiereJG.Criteria for piloted ignition of combustible solids. Combut Flame2007; 151: 551–559.
19.
ThomsonHEDrysdaleDD.Flammability of plastics II: critical mass flux at the fire point. Fire Safety J1989; 14: 179–188.
20.
ZhouYYWaltherDCFernandez-PelloAC.Numerical analysis of piloted ignition of polymeric materials. Combut Flame2002; 131: 147–158.
21.
DelichatsiosMAZhangJ.An alternative way for the ignition times for solids with radiation absorption in-depth by simple asymptotic solutions. Fire Mater2012; 36: 41–47.
22.
SnegirevAKuznetsovEMarkusE.Coupled analytical approach to predict piloted flaming ignition of non-charring polymers. Fire Safety J2017; 93: 74–83.
23.
LautenbergerCFernandez-PelloC.Generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids. Fire Safety J2009; 44: 819–839.
24.
KashiwagiTOhlemillerTJ.A study of oxygen effects on nonflaming transient gasification of PMMA and PE during thermal irradiation. Proc Symp (Int) Combust1982; 19: 815–823.
25.
KashaniAEsfahaniJA.Interactive effect of oxygen diffusion and volatiles advection on transient thermal degradation of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA). Heat Mass Transfer2008; 44: 641–650.
26.
SteinhausT.Evaluation of the thermophysical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate): a reference material for the development of a flammability test for micro-gravity environments. Master’s Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1999.
27.
RhodesBTQuintiereJG.Burning rate and flame heat flux for PMMA in a cone calorimeter. Fire Safety J1996; 26: 221–240.
