The advantage of utilizing modeling to study fire performance of textiles is the ability to conduct detailed studies of the effect of fabric characteristics on flame spread. First, two textile materials are chosen for modeling that exhibit two limit cases: complete flame spread (nylon 6,6/cotton fiber fabric) and self-extinguish (flame retardant rayon/nylon 6,6/para-aramid fiber fabric) in the standard vertical flame test (ASTM D6413). Parameter estimation for unknown model parameters is performed for these samples followed by a sensitivity analysis. Then a new sample is modeled—flame retardant cotton fiber fabric, flame retardant cotton. This modeling exercise shows that computational fluid dynamics modeling is capable of capturing the fire characteristics of different fabric samples in the vertical flame test only when the parameters are carefully estimated considering the modeling assumptions and approaches. Additionally, several areas for further investigation are proposed to improve simulation capability when conducting vertical flame test modeling with textile samples.
ASTM D6413/D6413M-13b:2007. Standard test method for flame resistance of textiles (vertical test), www.astm.org
2.
McGrattanKHostikkaSMcDermottR. Fire dynamics simulator: user’s guide. Report NIST SP 1019-6, 26November2013. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
3.
McGrattanKHostikkaSMcDermottR. Fire dynamics simulator technical reference guide volume 1: mathematical model. Report NIST SP 1018-6, 26November2013. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
4.
KimEDembseyNAGodfreyT. Numerical Modeling of Vertical Flame Testing of Nylon-Cotton and Flame Resistant Fabric Combat Uniforms in Proceedings of Fire and Materials 2015, 14th International Conference, Interscience Communications, Hyatt Hotel Fisherman’s Wharf, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–4 February 2015.
5.
KimEDembseyNA.Parameter estimation for comprehensive pyrolysis modeling: guidance and critical observations. Fire Technol2015; 51(2): 443–477. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-014-0399-0.
ASTM E1131-08(2014):2014. Standard test method for compositional analysis by thermogravimetry, www.astm.org
8.
ASTM D7309-07:2007. Standard test method for determining flammability characteristics of plastics and other solid materials using microscale combustion calorimetry, www.astm.org
9.
ASTM E 1354-02:2002. Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using an oxygen consumption calorimeter.
10.
KimEDembseyNAGodfreyT. Parametric study of fabric characteristics effect on vertical flame test performance using numerical modeling. In: STP1593 on tenth symposium on performance of protective clothing and equipment: risk reduction through research and testing, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
11.
RoperFG. The prediction of laminar jet diffusion flame sizes: part I. Theoretical model. Combust Flame1977; 29: 219–226. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(77)90112-2.
12.
RoperFG. The prediction of laminar jet diffusion flame sizes: part II. Experimental verification. Combust Flame1977; 29: 227–234. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(77)90113-4.
OzawaT.A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bull Chem Soc Jpn1965; 38: 1881–1886.
15.
FlynnJHWallLA.A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. J Polym Sci Pol Lett1966; 4: 323–328.
16.
FriedmanHL.Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry: application to a phenolic plastic. J Polym Sci Pol Sym1964; 6: 183–195.
17.
KimEDembseyNAShivkumarS.Evaluating effects of applying different kinetic models to pyrolysis modeling of fiberglass reinforced polymer composites. Fire Mater2015; 39: 153–173. DOI: 10.1002/fam.2239.
18.
Perez-MaquedaLACriadoJMSanchez-JimenezPE.Combined kinetic analysis of solid-state reactions: a powerful tool for the simultaneous determination of kinetic parameters and the kinetic model without previous assumptions on the reaction mechanism. J Phys Chem A2006; 110: 12456–12462.
19.
OpfermannJ.Kinetic analysis using multivariate non-linear regression I. Basic concepts. J Therm Anal Calorim2000; 60: 641–658.
20.
LautenbergerC. Gpyro—a generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids. Technical reference, version 0.700, 19February2009.
21.
TranHCWhiteRH.Burning rate of solid wood measured in a heat release rate calorimeter. Fire Mater1992; 16: 197–206. DOI: 10.1002/fam.810160406.
StoliarovSISafronavaNLyonRE.The effect of variation in polymer properties on the rate of burning. Fire Mater2009; 33: 257–271. DOI: 10.1002/fam.1003.
24.
SaltelliAChanKScottEM.Sensitivity analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
25.
KhanNDollimoreDAlexanderK. The origin of the exothermic peak in the thermal decomposition of basic magnesium carbonate. Thermochim Acta2001; 367–368: 321–333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(00)00669-9
26.
QiuYCollinFHurtRH. Thermochemistry and kinetics of graphite oxide exothermic decomposition for safety in large-scale storage and processing. Carbon2016; 96: 20–28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.040
