Functional testing of any model is a vital step in demonstrating that its predictive capabilities are working appropriately; correspond as expected to the circumstances being modeled and where further work should be directed. This article presents a series of exercises used to substantiate the movement prediction capability of a probabilistic network-based evacuation model that is currently under development. Two simple component configurations and two previously available worked examples are used to demonstrate that the model performs adequately. Movement times from model predictions, hand calculations, alternative empirical methods, and other computer models were compared for a range of typical occupant densities.
Sime, J.D. ( 1994). Escape Behaviour in Fires and Evacuations. In: Stallord, P. andJohnston, L. (eds.), Design Against Fire: An Introduction to Fire Safety Engineering Design, E & FN SPON, London.
2.
Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P.J. and Filippidis, L. ( 1999). A Review of the Methodologies Used in Evacuation Modelling , Fire and Materials, 23(6): 383-388.
3.
Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Owen, M. and Lawrence, P.J. ( 2002). An Investigation of the Aspects of Occupant Behavior Required for Evacuation Modeling. In: DeCicco, P.R., (ed.), Evacuation from Fires, Vol. II, Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York.
4.
Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Lawrence, P.J., Owen, M. and Filippidis, L. ( 1998). A Systematic Comparison of Model Predictions Produced by BuildingEXODUS Evacuation Model and the Tsukuba Pavilion Evacuation Data , Journal of Applied Fire Science, 7(3): 235-266.
5.
Kuligowski, E.D. and Milke, J.A. (2005). A Performance-based Egress Analysis of a Hotel Building using Two Models, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 15: 287-305.
6.
Gwynne, S., Galea, E.R., Lawrence, P.J., Owen, M. and Filippidis, L. ( 1999). A Review of the Methodologies used in the Computer Simulation of Evacuation from the Built Environment, Building and Environment , 34: 741-749.
7.
Kuligowski, E.D. ( 2005). Review of 28 Egress Models, NIST SP 1032, In: Peacock, R.D. and Kuligowski, E.D. (eds.), Workshop on Building Occupant Movement during Fire Emergencies, June 10-11, 2004, pp. 68-90, Gaithersburg, MD.
8.
Proulx, G. ( 2002). Movement of People: The Evacuation Timing, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd edn, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts.
9.
Pauls, J. ( 2007). Design Issues within the Egress Stairway Enclosure, In: Proc. AEI Symposium on Egress Stairs in High-Rise Buildings , Architectural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
10.
Nelson, H.E. and Mowrer, F.W. ( 2002). Emergency Movement, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd edn, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts .
11.
Spearpoint, M.J. (ed.). ( 2008). Fire Engineering Design Guide, 3rd edn, CAENZ, Christchurch, New Zealand.
12.
Ko, S.Y. , Spearpoint, M.J. and Teo, A. (2007). Trial Evacuation of an Industrial Premises and Evacuation Model Comparison, Fire Safety Journal, 42(2): 91-105.
13.
Compliance Document for New Zealand Building Code, Fire Safety Clauses. (2006). Department of Building and Housing, Wellington, New Zealand.
14.
Thompson, P. , Wu, J. and Marchant, E. (1996). Modelling Evacuation in Multi-storey Buildings with Simulex, Fire Engineers Journal , 56(185): 7-11.
15.
Spearpoint, M.J. (2004). The Effect of Pre-evacuation on Evacuation Times in the Simulex Model, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 14(1): 33-53.
16.
Schadschneider, A., Klingsch, W., Klüpfel, H., Kretz, T., Rogsch, C. and Seyfried, A. ( 2008). Evacuation Dynamics: Empirical Results, Modeling and Applications, In: Meyers, B., (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Complexity and System Science, Springer , Berlin.
17.
Pauls, J. ( 1987). Calculating Evacuation Times for Tall Buildings, Fire Safety Journal, 12: 213-236.
