Nonstandard employees typically receive less favorable treatment than their standard counterparts, yet little is known about how supervisors manage and interact with them. Drawing on three-wave, time-lagged survey data from 650 nonstandard employees in Chinese public organizations, this study reveals that abusive supervision increases employees’ use of surface acting while reducing their use of deep acting, thereby intensifying emotional exhaustion. Unexpectedly, the likelihood of standard employment, which is often regarded as a positive expectation, intensifies rather than mitigates the negative effects of abusive supervision. This study enhances our understanding of emotional labor under abusive supervision and provides practical insights for public organizations to better motivate and support nonstandard employees.
BackhausL.VogelR. (2022). Leadership in the public sector: A meta-analysis of styles, outcomes, contexts, and methods.Public Administration Review, 82(6), 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13516
2.
BoswellW. R.Olson-BuchananJ. B.LePineM. A. (2004). Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00049-6
3.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BrotheridgeC. M.LeeR. T. (2003). Development and validation of the emotional labour scale.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647229
5.
Coyle-ShapiroJ. A. M.KesslerI. (2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: Contrasting psychological contracts.Public Administration, 80(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00295
6.
CrosbyB. C.BrysonJ. M. (2018). Why leadership of public leadership research matters: And what to do about it.Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731
7.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the Yin—But where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
8.
GeorgeE.ChattopadhyayP.ZhangL. L. (2012). Helping hand or competition? The moderating influence of perceived upward mobility on the relationship between blended workgroups and employee attitudes and behaviors.Organization Science, 23(2), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0606
9.
GrandeyA. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
10.
GrandeyA. A. (2003). When “the show must go on”: Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery.Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040678
11.
GunnV.VivesA.ZaupaA.Hernando-RodriguezJ. C.JuliàM.KvartS.LewchukW.PadrosaE.VosM. P.AhonenE. Q.BaronS.BosmansK.DavisL.DíazI.Matilla-SantanderN.MuntanerC.O’CampoP.ÖstergrenP.-O.VanroelenC.BodinT. (2022). Non-standard employment and unemployment during the COVID-19 crisis: economic and health findings from a six-country survey study.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105865
12.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A.MastracciS. H. (2014). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Routledge.
13.
HarrisK. J.HarveyP.KacmarK. M. (2011). Abusive supervisory reactions to coworker relationship conflict. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 1010–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.020
HassanS.WrightB. E.YuklG. (2014). Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems.Public Administration Review, 74(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12216
16.
Hennig-ThurauT.GrothM.PaulM.GremlerD. D. (2006). Are all smiles created equal? How emotional contagion and emotional labor affect service relationships.Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.058
17.
HobfollS. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory.Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
18.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizin stress.American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
19.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ. P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
20.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
21.
HsiehC. W. (2014). Burnout among public service workers: The role of emotional labor requirements and job resources.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(4), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X12460554
22.
HuangT.VilladsenA. R. (2023). Top managers in public organizations: A systematic literature review and future research directions.Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1618–1634. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13628
23.
HumphreyN. M. (2023). Emotional labor and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis.Public Administration, 101(2), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12818
24.
JacobsenC. B.StaniokC. D. (2020). Sharing the fire? The moderating role of transformational leadership congruence on the relationship between managers’ and employees’ organizational commitment.International Public Management Journal, 23(4), 564–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1486930
25.
JungH. J.NohS. C.KimI. (2018). Relative deprivation of temporary agency workers in the public sector: The role of public service motivation and the possibility of standard employment.Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12186
26.
KadirA.WirawanH.SalamR.HattabS.DaswatiD. (2024). Abusive supervision in public service organisations: Investigating the moderating effect of attribution styles. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(2), 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2274571
27.
KallebergA. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations intransition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
28.
LeeR. T.AshforthB. E. (1993). A further examination of managerial burnout: Toward an integrated model.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140103
29.
LiaoZ.LeeH. W.JohnsonR. E.SongZ.LiuY. (2021). Seeing from a short-term perspective: When and why daily abusive supervisor behavior yields functional and dysfunctional consequences.Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000508
30.
LiuX.QinC.LiuS.LuW. (2022). Why and when temporary workers engage in more counterproductive work behaviors with permanent employees in Chinese state-own enterprise: A social identity perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138030
31.
LuuT. (2018). Discretionary HR practices and proactive work behaviour: The mediation role of affective commitment and the moderation roles of PSM and abusive supervision.Public Management Review, 20(6), 789–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1335342
32.
MastracciS.AdamsI. (2019). Is emotional labor easier in collectivist or individualist cultures? An east–west comparison.Public Personnel Management, 48(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018814569
33.
MiaoQ.NewmanA.SchwarzG.CooperB. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior.Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12839
34.
MiaoQ.GuoY. (2025). The effect of occupational stigma on job withdrawal behavior: A chain mediation model based on an emotional labor perspective.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 45(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241252940
35.
National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. (2024). China labor statistical yearbook 2024. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/
36.
NguyenD. T.TeoS. T.GroverS. L.NguyenN. P. (2019). Respect, bullying, and public sector work outcomes in Vietnam.Public Management Review, 21(6), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1538426
37.
NguyenN. T. H.NguyenD.TeoS.XerriM. J. (2024). Abusive supervision and turnover intention among public servants: The roles of psychological distress and person-organization fit.Public Management Review, 26(11), 3201–3226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2287489
38.
OspinaS. M. (2017). Collective leadership and context in public administration: Bridging public leadership research and leadership studies.Public Administration Review, 77(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12706
39.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
40.
SchottR. L. (1986). The psychological development of adults: Implications for public administration.Public Administration Review, 46(6), 657–667.
41.
SchwarzG.NewmanA.CooperB.EvaN. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation.Public Administration, 94(4), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12266
42.
SloanM. M. (2014). The consequences of emotional labor for public sector workers and the mitigating role of self-efficacy.The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012462864
43.
Stecy-HildebrandtN.FullerS.BurnsA. (2019). ‘Bad’ jobs in a ‘Good’ sector: Examining the employment outcomes of temporary work in the Canadian public sector.Work, Employment and Society, 33(4), 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018758217
44.
StoryJ.LottaG.TavaresG. M. (2023). (Mis) Led by an outsider: Abusive supervision, disengagement, and silence in politicized bureaucracies.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(4), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad004
45.
TepperB. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision.Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
UmansT.SmithE.AnderssonW.PlankenW. (2020). Top management teams’ shared leadership and ambidexterity: The role of management control systems.International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318783539
48.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/
49.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
50.
XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. B.OerlemansW. G.KoszuckaM. (2018). Need for recovery after emotional labor: Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2245
