Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action (AA) is important because it plays a critical role in the successful implementation of AA and hence diversity in organizations. The field of public sector human resource management (HRM) places a good deal of attention on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA). The legal tool of affirmative action remains an important tool for achieving DEIA. This study examines gender, race, and sector differences as predictors of gender- and race-based support for AA in the workplace. Using data from the 2000 to 2018 General Social Survey (GSS), this article finds that Blacks and other persons of color offer more support than White men for race-based and gender-based AA. In addition, women offer more support than men for gender-based affirmative action, but only in the private sector. Overall, public sector employees do not support race- or gender-based AA programs more than their private sector counterparts.
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta, 534 U.S. 103 (2001).
2.
BallardS.Lawn-DayG. (1992). Affirmative action in municipal government: Anatomy of a failure. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 12(3), 5–18.
3.
BlessettB.DodgeJ.EdmondB.GoerdelH. T.GoodenS. T.HeadleyA. M.RiccucciN. M.WilliamsB. N. (2019). Social equity in public administration: A call to action. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 283–299.
4.
BorryE. L.Getha-TaylorH.Husar HolmesM. (2021). Promoting diversity and inclusion in the federal workforce: Executive order 13583 and demographic trends. Public Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 392–417.
5.
CrenshawK. W. (2007). Framing affirmative action. Michigan Law Review, 105, 123–133.
CrumJ.NaffK. C. (1997). Looking like America: The continuing importance of affirmative action in federal employment. Public Productivity & Management Review, 20(3), 272–287.
8.
ElyR. J.ThomasD. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on workgroup processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 579 U.S. 365 (2016).
11.
FredericksonH. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228–237.
12.
GoodenS. T. (2015a). From equality to social equity. In GuyM. E.RubinM. M. (Eds.), Public administration evolving: From foundations to the future (pp. 210–231). Routledge.
13.
GoodenS. T. (2015b). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. Routledge.
14.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
15.
GuyM. E.McCandlessS. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S5–S13.
16.
GuyM. E.SowaJ. E. (2022). Human resource essentials for public service: People, process, performance. Melvin & Leigh Publishers
17.
HarrisG. L. A. (2009). Revisiting affirmative action in leveling the playing field: Who have been the true beneficiaries anyway?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29(4), 354–372.
18.
HarrisonD. A.KravitzD. A.MayerD. M.LeslieL. M.Lev-AreyD. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1013–1036.
19.
HoangT.SuhJ.SabharwalM. (2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537–555.
Johnson v. Santa Clara County Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987).
22.
KahanD. M.BramanD.GastilJ.SlovicP.MertzC. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the White-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465–505.
KaseyR. E. (1997). Human resource management and the African American worker: Research in support of proactive affirmative action initiatives. Journal of Black Studies, 27(6), 751–767.
KovacsJ. A.TruxilloD. M.BauerT. N.BodnerT. (2014). Perceptions of affirmative action based on socioeconomic status: A comparison with traditional affirmative action. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26(1), 35–57.
27.
KravitzD. A.KlinebergS.AveryD.NguyenA. K.LundC.FuE. J. (2000). Attitudes toward affirmative action: Correlations with demographic variables and with beliefs about targets, actions, and economic effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(6), 1109–1136.
28.
LauR. R.HeldmanC. (2009). Self-interest, symbolic attitudes, and support for public policy: A multilevel analysis. Political Psychology, 30(4), 513–537.
29.
LeeJ. (2022). A critical review and theorization of workplace backlash: Looking back and moving forward through the lens of social dominance theory. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100900.
30.
LeslieL. M. (2019). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 538–563.
31.
LeslieL. M.BonoJ. E.KimY. S.BeaverG. R. (2020). On melting pots and salad bowls: A meta-analysis of the effects of identity-blind and identity-conscious diversity ideologies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(5), 453–471.
32.
LeslieL. M.KingE. B.BradleyJ. C.HeblM. R. (2008). Triangulation across methodologies: All signs point to persistent stereotyping and discrimination in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(4), 399–404.
33.
LeslieL. M.MayerD. M.KravitzD. A. (2014). The stigma of affirmative action: A stereotyping-based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 964–989.
34.
LovellC. H. (1974). Three key issues in affirmative action. Public Administration Review, 34(3), 235–237.
35.
LovrichN. P.Jr.NicholasP.BrentS. S.DavidH. (1986). Equity versus productivity: Affirmative action and municipal police services. Public Productivity Review, 10(1), 61–72.
36.
MangumM. (2008). Testing competing explanations of Black opinions on affirmative action. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 347–366.
37.
McCandlessS.BishuS. G.Gómez HernándezM.Paredes ErasoÉ.SabharwalM.SantisE. L.YatesS. (2022). A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 129–148.
38.
McGheeH. C. (2021). The sum of us : What racism costs everyone and how we can prosper together. One World.
39.
NiemannY. F.DovidioJ. F. (2005). Affirmative action and job satisfaction: Understanding underlying processes. Journal of Social Issues, 61(3), 507–523.
40.
NoorM.VollhardtJ. R.MariS.NadlerA. (2017). The social psychology of collective victimhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 121–134.
41.
Norman-MajorK. (2011). Balancing the four Es; or can we achieve equity for social equity in public administration?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(2), 233–252.
42.
OrtegaR.PlagensG. K.StephensP.Berry-JamesR. M. (2012). Mexican American public sector professionals: Perceptions of affirmative action policies and workplace discrimination. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 24–44.
43.
OyinladeA. O. (2013). Affirmative action support in an organization: A test of three demographic models. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–12.
44.
ParkerC. P.BaltesB. B.ChristiansenN. D. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial–ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 376–389.
PortilloS.BearfieldD.HumphreyN. (2020). The myth of bureaucratic neutrality: Institutionalized inequity in local government hiring. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 516–531.
47.
QuereshiA. (2013). The forgotten remedy: A legal and theoretical defense of intermediate scrutiny for gender-based affirmative action programs. The American University Journal of Gender, Social policy & the Law, 21(4), 797–837.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 38 U.S. 265 (1978).
50.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382.
51.
RiccucciN. M. (2021a). Managing diversity in public sector workforces (2nd ed.). Routledge.
52.
RiccucciN. M. (2021b). Preparing Blacks and Latinx for workforce 2000: Unfulfilled promises and lost opportunities. Administration & Society, 53(9), 1362–1389.
53.
RiccucciN. M.SaldivarK. (2014). The status of employment discrimination suits in police and fire departments across the United States. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(3), 263–288.
54.
RushC. L.KelloughJ. E. (2017). Knowledge of Federal Eeo Law among county administrators and department heads:Examining the extent and determinants of understanding. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(1), 59–83.
55.
SabharwalM. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.
56.
SabharwalM.LevineH.D’AgostinoM. (2018). A conceptual content analysis of 75 years of diversity research in public administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 248–267.
SmithT. W.DavernM.FreeseJ.MorganS. L. (2019b). General social surveys, 1972-2018: Cumulative codebook. NORC.
59.
Son HingL. S.BobocelD. R.ZannaM. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 493–509.
60.
StahlO. G. (1976). Public personnel administration (7th ed.). Harper & Row.
61.
StiversC. (2012). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Sage.
62.
Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard College, 600 U.S. ___, 143 S.Ct. 2141 (2023).
63.
Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. University of North Carolina, 600 U.S. ___, 143 S.Ct. 52 (2023).
64.
SusskindA. M.BrymerR. A.KimW. G.LeeH. Y.WayS. A. (2014). Attitudes and perceptions toward affirmative action programs: An application of institutional theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 38–48.
United Steelworkers of America v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979).
69.
VollhardtJ. R.NairR.TroppL. R. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(6), 354–368.
70.
WingfieldA. H.ChavezK. (2020). Getting in, getting hired, getting sideways looks: Organizational hierarchy and perceptions of racial discrimination. American Sociological Review, 85(1), 31–57.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
