Social equity has been considered a pillar that supports the legitimacy of the field of public administration, with affirmative action as one of the most visible vehicles of the principle. However, the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions calls for a reconsideration of the practice and the value it supports. Though the Court has long viewed affirmative action to be suspect, it has now declared that the practice undermines the Constitution's mandate for equal treatment. This decision confronts not only what university administrators have done in the past, it also raises concerns about the field's broader relationship to the value of social equity more generally. The Court's opinion is a call to the field to recognize that public action which rests on social equity must be in alignment with a stiffened strict scrutiny in order to meet constitutional standards.
BillerR. P. (1971). Some implications of adaption capactiy for organizational and political development. In MariniF. E. (Ed.), Toward a new public administration: The minnowbrook perspective (pp. 93–121). Chandler Publishing Company.
4.
BlessettB.DodgeJ.EdmondB.GoerdelH. T.GoodenS. T.HeadleyA. M.RiccucciN. M.WilliamsB. N. (2019). Social equity in public administration: A call to action.Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz016
5.
BreihanA. W. (2007). Attracting and retaining a diverse student body: Proven, practical strategies.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001469
6.
BrooksD. D.GriffinL. D.RawlingsT.StoweR. W.NorwoodD. (2023). An equity-focused approach to graduate student recruitment and retention. Kinesiology Review, 12(4), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2023-0027
7.
CepikuD.MastrodascioM. (2021). Equity in Public Services: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.v81.6
8.
DavenportD.NatesanS.CaldwellM. T.GallegosM.LandryA.ParsonsM.GottliebM. (2022). Faculty recruitment, retention, and representation in leadership. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 23(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.8.53754
9.
DeiG. (2016). Decolonizing the university: The challenges and possibilities of inclusive education. Socialist Studies, 11(1), 23–61.
10.
DouglassJ. A. (2007). The Conditions for Admission: Access, equity, and the social contract of public universities. Stanford University Press.
11.
DurantR. F.RosenbloomD. H. (2017). The hollowing of American public administration.The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015627218
12.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2013). 570 U.S.__.
13.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016). 579 U.S.__.
14.
FredericksonH. G. (1971). Toward a new public administration. In MariniF. E. (Ed.), In toward a new public administration: The minnowbrook perspective (pp. 309–331). Chandler Publishing Company.
15.
FredericksonH. G. (1980). The New Public Administration. The University of Alabama Press.
16.
FredericksonH. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity.Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/976870
FredericksonH. G.HartD. K. (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence.Public Administration Review, 45(5), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109929
22.
GoodenS. T. (2014). Race and Social Equity: A Nervous Area of Government. M.E. Sharpe.
GoodenS. T. (2017). Social equity and evidence: Insights from local government.Public Administration Review, 77(6), 822–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12851
GoodenS. T.PortilloS. (2011). Advancing social equity in the minnowbrook tradition.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(no. suppl_), i61–i76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq067
27.
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). 539 U.S. 306.
28.
GuyM. E.McCandlessS. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise.Public Administration Review, 72(S1), S5–S13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02635.x
29.
GuyM. E.McCandlessS. A. (2020). Achieving social equity: From problems to solutions. Melvin & Leigh.
30.
HartD. K. (1974). Social equity, justice, and the equitable administrator.Public Administration Review, 34(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/974395
31.
JohnsonK. R. (2011). The importance of student and faculty diversity in law schools: One dean's perspective.Iowa Law Review, 96, 1549–1577.
32.
JPART (2022). A request for proposals for editor of the journal of public administration research and theory. Retrieved December 5. https://pmranet.org/jpart/.
33.
LaursenS.AustinA. E. (2020). Building gender equity in the academy: Institutional strategies for change. Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
MariniF. ed. (1971a). Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Chandler Publishing Company.
35.
MariniF. (1971b). Introduction: A new public administration? In MariniF. E. (Ed.), In toward a new public administration: The minnowbrook perspective (pp. 1–16). Chandler Publishing Company.
36.
McCandlessS.BishuS. G.HernándezM. G.ErasoE. P.SabharwalM.SantisE. L.YatesS. (2022). A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration.Public Administration, 100(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12830
37.
McCandlessS.LarsonS. J. (2018). Prioritizing social equity in MPA curricula: A cross-program analysis and a case study.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1426429
38.
MeyerS. J.Johnson IIIR. G.McCandlessS. (2022). Moving the field forward with empathy, engagement, equity, and ethics.Public Integrity, 24(4–5), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2089476.
39.
MilesV. V. (2004). Recruiting and retaining faculty of color in the legal academy: A lonstanding commitment of the association of American law schools.Wash. & Lee Race & Ethnic Anc, 10, 65–74.
40.
NalbandianJ. (1989). Nalbandian on the court and social equity.Public Administration Review, 49(3), 293–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/977016
41.
NalbandianJ. (1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109948
Norman-MajorK. (2011). Balancing the four E s; or can we achieve equity for social equity in public administration?.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2011.12001640
46.
PandeyS. K.SmithA. E.PandeyS.OjelabiO. A. (2023). Reimagining race and gender in public administration and public policy: Insights from an interdisciplinary systematic review.Public Administration Review, 83(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13570
RappaportM. B. (2013). Originalism and the colorblind constitution.Notre Dame Law Review, 89(1), 71–132.
50.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). 438 U.S. 265.
51.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x
52.
RohrJ. A. (1986). To Run a Constitution. University Press of Kansas.
RooseveltK. (2015). The ironies of affirmative action.Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(3), 729–756.
55.
RosenbloomD. (2000). Retrofitting the administrative state to the constitution.Public Administration Review, 60(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00060
SabharwalM.LevineH.D’AgostinoM. (2018). A conceptual content analysis of 75 years of diversity research in public administration.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16671368
60.
SanderR. H. (2004). A systemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools.Stanford Law Review, 57, 367–483.
61.
SmithD. G. (2020). Diversity's Promise for Higher Education: Making It Work. Johns Hopkins University Press.
62.
SpicerM. W. (1995). The Founders, the Constitution, and Public Administration. Georgetown University Press.
63.
SpicerM. W.TerryL. D. (1993). Legitimacy, history, and logic: Public administration and the constitution.Public Administration Review, 53(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110129.
64.
StearnsM. L. (2017). Obergefell, fisher, and the inversion of tiers.University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(5), 1043–1109.
65.
StokanE.HatchM. E.OvertonM. (2023). Fifty years as the fourth pillar of public administration: A polycentric extension of the social equity framework.Public Administration, 101(4), 1427–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12888
66.
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College (2023). 600 U.S.__.
67.
Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, et al. (2023). 600 U.S.__.
68.
SvaraJ. H.BrunetJ. R. (2004). Filling in the skeletal pillar: Addressing social equity in introductory courses in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2004.12001351.
69.
SvaraJ. H.BrunetJ. R. (2005). Social equity is a pillar of public administration.Journal of Public Administration Education, 11(3), 253–258.
70.
SvaraJ. H.BrunetJ. R. (2020). The importance of social equity to prevent a hollow public administration.The American Review of Public Administration, 50(4-5), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020910509
TerryL. D. (2003). Leadership of Public Bureaucracies: The Administrator as Conservator. M.E. Sharpe.
73.
ThompsonV. A. (1975). Without sympathy or enthusiasm. University of Alabama Press.
74.
United States v. Virginia (1996). 518 U.S. 515.
75.
WaldoD. (1948). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. Ronald Press.
76.
WaldoD. (1971). Foreword. In MariniF. E. (Ed.), Toward a new public administration: The minnowbrook perspective (pp. xiii–xxix). Chandler Publishing Company.
77.
WamsleyG. L. (1990). Introduction. In WamsleyG. L.BacherR. N.GoodsellC. T.KronenbergP. S.RohrJ. A.StiversC. M.WhiteO. F.WolfJ. F. (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 19–29). Sage Publications.
78.
WhiteO. F. (1971). Social change and administrative adaptation. In MariniF. E. (Ed.), In toward a new public administration: The minnowbrook perspective (pp. 59–83). Chandler Publishing Company.
79.
WiseL. R. (1990). Social equity in civil service systems.Public Administration Review, 50(5), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/976787
80.
WiseC. R. (1993). Public administration is constitutional and legitimate. Public Administration Review, 53(3), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110133
81.
ZimringB. (1971). Comment: Empirical theory and the new public administration. In MariniF. E. (Ed.), In toward a new public administration: The minnowbrook perspective (pp. 225–233). Chandler Publishing Company.
