Discrimination against caregivers is a topic of interest for the public sector workplace. This study assesses the degree to which family responsibilities discrimination (FRD) can diminish work satisfaction and lead to intentions of leaving the public service. It also examines the effects of flexible work arrangements on work satisfaction and intentions to leave. Applying Mahalanobis Distance Matching, we examine the Canadian Public Service Employee Survey and find evidence that family status discrimination has some impact on employees’ intention to leave the public service and can diminish satisfaction with work arrangements. We also find that federal public servants who feel like work and family/personal obligations adversely affected their career progression were less satisfied with their work arrangements and were more likely to want to leave their positions.
Al-BcherrawyJ. M. (1997). Home work as a new way of working: An exploratory empirical study. Concordia University.
2.
AlbistonC.DicksonK. B.FishmanC.LevyL. F. (2008). Ten lessons for practitioners about family responsibilities discrimination and stereotyping evidence. Hastings Law Journal, 59(6), 1285–1309.
3.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2011). Covert pay discrimination: How authority predicts pay differences between women and men. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 740–750.
4.
AllenT. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435.
5.
AlteriA. M. (2016). Gender-based discrimination in the workplace. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 264–282.
AryeeS.BudhwarP. S.ChenZ. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267–285.
8.
BaeK. B.LeeD.SohnH. (2019). How to increase participation in telework programs in U.S. Federal Agencies: Examining the effects of being a female supervisor, supportive leadership, and diversity management. Public Personnel Management, 48(4), 565–583.
9.
BenardS.CorrellS. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society, 24(5), 616–646.
10.
BirdR. C. (2016). Precarious work: The need for flextime employment rights and proposals for reform. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 37(1), 1–41.
11.
BlackwellM.IacusS.KingG.PorroG. (2009). Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546.
12.
BornsteinS. (2012). Work, family & discrimination at the bottom of the ladder. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 19(1), 1–42.
13.
CaillierJ. G. (2013). Are teleworkers less likely to report leave intentions in the United States federal government than non-teleworkers are?The American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 72–88.
14.
CaillierJ. G. (2016). Does satisfaction with family-friendly programs reduce turnover? A panel study conducted in U.S. Federal Agencies. Public Personnel Management, 45(3), 284–307.
15.
CalvertC. T. (2010). Family responsibilities discrimination: Litigation update 2010. Center for Work Life Law.
16.
Canadian Human Rights Commission. (2014). A guide to balancing work and caregiving obligations: Collaborative approaches for a supportive and well-performing workplace.
17.
ChoY. J.SaiN. (2012). Does organizational justice matter in the federal workplace?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(3), 227–251.
18.
ChoiS.WhitfordA. B. (2017). Employee satisfaction in agencies with merit-based pay: Differential effects for three measures. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 442–466.
19.
ChristensenK. E. (1987). Impacts of computer-mediated home-based work on women and their families. Office Technology and People, 3(3), 211–230.
CrowleyJ. E. (2013). Perceiving and responding to maternal workplace discrimination in the United States. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 192–202.
23.
de AlwisR. D. (2011). Examining gender stereotypes in new work/family reconciliation policies: The creation of a new paradigm for egalitarian legislation. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 18(2), 305–334.
24.
den DulkL.GroeneveldS. (2012). Work-life balance support in the public sector in Europe. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(4), 384–405.
DicksonC. E. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of perceived family responsibilities discrimination in the workplace. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 11(1), 113–140.
27.
DunhamR. B.PierceJ. L.CastanedaM. B. (1987). Alternative Work Schedules: Two Field Quasi-Experiments. Personnel Psychology, 40(2), 215–242.
28.
DurantR. F. (2014). Taking time seriously: Progressivism, the business–social science nexus, and the paradox of American administrative reform. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 8–18.
29.
DurantR. F.RosenbloomD. H. (2017). The hollowing of American public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 719–736.
30.
Employment and Social Development Canada. (2016). Flexible work arrangements: What was heard. Ministry of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour.
31.
EzraM.DeckmanM. (1996). Balancing work and family responsibilities: Flextime and child care in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 174–197.
32.
FacerR. L.IIWadsworthL. (2008). Alternative work schedules and work family balance: A research note. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 166–177.
33.
FarrellN.GuertinG. (2008). Old problem, new tactic: Making the case for legislation to combat employment discrimination based on family caregiver status. Hastings Law Journal, 59(6), 1463–1490.
34.
FeeneyM. K.StritchJ. M. (2019). Family-friendly policies, gender, and work–life balance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 422–448.
35.
FernandezS.ReshW. G.MoldogazievT.OberfieldZ. W. (2015). Assessing the past and promise of the federal employee viewpoint survey for public management research: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 382–394.
36.
GajendranR. S.HarrisonD. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
37.
Gould-WilliamsJ.DaviesF. (2005). Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes. Public Management Review, 7(1), 1–24.
GreenbergJ. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.
40.
GroverS. L.CrookerK. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 271–288.
41.
HamidullahM. F.RiccucciN. M. (2017). Intersectionality and family-friendly policies in the federal government: Perceptions of women of color. Administration & Society, 49(1), 105–120.
42.
HickeyA.BennettS. E. (2012). Canadian public service employee satisfaction and its main drivers. Canadian Public Administration, 55(1), 5–23.
43.
HillmerN.LagasséP. (Eds.). (2018). Justin Trudeau and Canadian foreign policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
44.
HirshC. E.KornrichS. (2008). The context of discrimination: Workplace conditions, institutional environments, and sex and race discrimination charges. American Journal of Sociology, 113(5), 1394–1432.
45.
JonesA. M.FinkelsteinR.KoehoornM. (2018). Disability and workplace harassment and discrimination among Canadian federal public service employees. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 109(1), 79–88.
46.
JulienM.SomervilleK.CulpN. (2011). Going beyond the work arrangement: The crucial role of supervisor support. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 167–204.
47.
KimJ.WigginsM. E. (2011). Family-friendly human resource policy: Is it still working in the public sector?Public Administration Review, 71(5), 728–739.
48.
KimS. (2001). Perceived impacts of family leave policy: Do organizational factors matter?Public Personnel Management, 30(2), 221–239.
49.
KimS. Y.LeeD. (2019). Work-life program participation and employee work attitudes: A quasi-experimental analysis using matching methods. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1–19.
50.
KimT.MullinsL. B. (2016). How does supervisor support and diversity management affect employee participation in work/family policies? A research note. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 80–105.
51.
KimW. C.MauborgneR. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65–75.
52.
KingG.NielsenR.CoberleyC.PopeJ. E.WellsA. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. Harvard University.
53.
KossekE. E.LautschB. A.EatonS. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002
54.
KulowM. D. (2012). Legislating a family-friendly workplace: Should it be done in the United States?Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 7(1), 88–115.
55.
LeeD.KimS. Y. (2018). A quasi-experimental examination of telework eligibility and participation in the U.S. federal government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(4), 451–471.
56.
LeeS.-Y.HongJ. H. (2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 870–879.
57.
LipsH.LawsonK. (2009). Work values, gender, and expectations about work commitment and pay: Laying the groundwork for the “motherhood penalty”?Sex Roles, 61(9-10), 667–676.
58.
MartinB. H.MacDonnellR. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–616.
59.
MartucciW. C.SinatraK. R. (2008). Caregivers in the workplace: Prohibitions against family-responsibility discrimination. Employment Relations Today, 34(4), 71–76.
60.
MeierK. J. (2015). Proverbs and the evolution of public administration. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 15–24.
MilwardB.JensenL.RobertsA.Dussauge-LagunaM. I.JunjanV.TorenvliedR.. . . DurantR. F. (2016). Is public management neglecting the state?Governance, 29(3), 311–334.
63.
MincerJ.PolachekS. (1978). An exchange: The theory of human capital and the earnings of women: Women’s earnings reexamined. The Journal of Human Resources, 13(1), 118–134.
MorrisonA. M.von GlinowM. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45(2), 200–208.
66.
MullinsL. B. (2014). Is family responsibilities discrimination the new sex discrimination? Lessons from school teachers’ perceptions. Review of Public Administration and Management, 2(1), 142–146.
67.
Office of the Ombudsman for Mental Health. (2018). 2017-2018 annual report to the deputy minister. Public Service and Procurement Canada.
68.
ParkerL.AllenT. D. (2001). Work/family benefits: Variables related to employees’ fairness perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 453–468.
PierceJ. L.NewstromJ. W. (1982). Employee Responses to Flexible Work Schedules: An Inter-Organization, Inter-System Comparison. Management Studies, 8(1), 9–25.
71.
PotipiroonW.RubinE. V. (2018). Who is most influenced by justice perceptions? Assessing the role of occupational status. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(3), 271–302.
Public Service Human Resources Management Agency of Canada. (2006). What you told us—Public service-wide results.
74.
RiccucciN. M. (2015). From sameness to differentness. In GuyM. E.RubinM. M. (Eds.), Public administration evolving: From foundations to the future (pp. 192–209). Routledge.
75.
RossJ. P.IntindolaM. L.BojeD. M. (2017). It was the best of times; It was the worst of times: The expiration of work–life balance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 202–215.
76.
RubinE. V. (2009). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the Department of Defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 125–143.
77.
SaltzsteinA. L.TingY.SaltzsteinG. H. (2001). Work-family balance, and job satisfaction: The impact of family-friendly policies on attitudes of federal government employees. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 452–467.
78.
SchwartzD. B. (1996). The impact of work-family policies on women’s career development: Boon or bust?Women in Management Review, 11(1), 5–19.
79.
SettoonR. P.BennettN.LidenR. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader – member exchange and employees reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.
80.
Sigle-RushtonW.WaldfogelJ. (2007). Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics, 13(2), 55–91.
81.
StillM. C. (2008). Family responsibilities discrimination and the new institutionalism. Hastings Law Journal, 59(6), 1491–1515.
82.
StoneC. A.TangY. (2013). Comparing propensity score methods in balancing covariates and recovering impact in small sample educational program evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(3), 1–12.
83.
StroberM. H. (1990). Human capital theory: Implications for HR managers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 29(2), 214–239.
TremblayD. G.PaquetR.NajemE. (2006). Telework: A way to balance work and family or an increase in work-family conflict?Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(3), 715–731.
Von BergenC. W. (2008). “The times they are a-changin”: Family responsibilities discrimination and the EEOC. Employee Responsibilities Rights Journal, 20(3), 177–194.
91.
WadsworthL. L.FacerR. L. (2016). Work–Family balance and alternative work schedules: Exploring the impact of 4-day workweeks on state employees. Public Personnel Management, 45(4), 382–404.
92.
WayneS. J.ShoreL. M.LidenR. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader – member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.
93.
WilliamsJ. C.BornsteinS. (2006). Caregivers in the courtroom: The growing trend of family responsibilities discrimination. University of San Francisco Law Review, 41(2), 171–190.
94.
WilliamsJ. C.BornsteinS. (2008). The evolution of “FRED”: Family responsibility discrimination and developments in the law of stereotyping and implicit bias. Hastings Law Journal, 59, 1311–1358.
95.
WilliamsJ. C.CooperH. C. (2004). The public policy of motherhood. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 849–865.
96.
YuH. H.LeeD. (2019). Gender and public organization: A quasi-experimental examination of inclusion on experiencing and reporting wrongful behavior in the workplace. Public Personnel Management, 1–26.
