Telework is an increasingly common feature of government agencies. Long a practice in the private sector, telework is credited with a range of advantages from increased productivity to reduced environmental costs to society. These advantages may not accrue to all employees, however. Large-sample federal government surveys of employees reveal support for many of the claimed advantages of telework, but taken together they also raise significant questions about the seldom-discussed costs of telework: The impact on those barred from telework. In particular, the results reveal what may be disaffection among those whose jobs may be eligible for teleworking under new Office of Personnel Management guidelines, but whose managers have not allowed them to telework. The findings also raise questions about the consequences of expanding telework to larger populations of government workers and suggest the need for further research on the possibility of an emerging telework divide.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
CaillierJ. G. (2011, November16). Are teleworkers less likely to report leave intentions in the united states federal government than non-teleworkers are?American Review of Public Administration. Published online ahead of print. doi:10.1177/0275074011425084
4.
CaillierJ. G. (2012, May8). Satisfaction with work-life benefits and organizational commitment/job involvement: Is there a connection?Review of Public Personnel Administration. Published online ahead of print. doi:10.1177/0734371X12443266
5.
CascioWayne F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Executive, 14 (3), 81-90.
Cisco. (2009). Cisco study finds telecommuting significantly increases employee productivity, work-life flexibility and job satisfaction: Increased productivity due to telecommuting generates an estimated $277 million in annual savings for company. Retrieved from http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2009/prod_062609.html
KempD. R. (1995). Telecommuting in the public sector : An overview and a survey of the states. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 15(3), 5-16.
12.
KhaifaM.DavidsonR. (2000). Exploring the telecommuting paradox. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 29-31.
13.
MahlerJ. (2012). Managing virtual public organizations, In KlobyK.D’AgustineM. (Eds.), Citizens 2.0: Public and governmental interaction through web 2.0 technologies (pp. 65-85). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
14.
MaruyamaT.HopkinsonP. G.JamesP. W. (2009). A multivariate analysis of work-life balance outcomes from a large-scale telework programme. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(1), 76-88.
OffsteinE.MorwickJ.KoskinenL. (2010). Making telework work: Leading people and leveraging technology for competitive advantage. Strategic HR Review, 9(2), 32-37.
OvermyerS. P. (2011). Implementing telework: Lessons learned from four federal agencies. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
23.
RaineyH. (2010). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
TaskinL.EdwardsP. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the Public Sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), 195-207.
25.
TaylorS.KluemperD.SauleyK. (2009). Equity sensitivity revisited: Contrasting unidimensional and multidimensional approaches. Journal of Business Psychology, 24, 299-314.
26.
ThompsonJ. R.RaineyH. G. (2003). Modernizing human resource management in the federal government: The IRS Model. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
