Inspecting the Merit System’s “Pivotal Idea”: Does Competitive Examination Increase the Qualifications and Quality of the U.S. Federal Service?

Abstract

According to its designers, the U.S. merit system centered on a “pivotal idea”: The civil service would use “open, fair, honest, impartial, competitive examination” to find the people “best fitted to discharge the duties of the position.” Officials would announce job openings to the widest-possible applicant pool and assess that pool on uniformly applied, job-relevant criteria. Over time, however, alternative hiring mechanisms have increased in popularity as means to improve the speed or flexibility the hiring process, with limited research on their impact on the federal service. To understand their effects, we examine all federal, nondefense employees hired between 1983 and 2013 to assess whether four alternative hiring procedures affect the educational attainment (a proxy for qualifications) and career advancement (a proxy for quality) of new hires. We find that employees hired through competitive examinations possess more education upon entry than employees selected through two of those alternative procedures; however, employees hired through all four alternative procedures advance in their careers at least as rapidly as those selected via competitive examinations.

Keywords

human capital merit recruitment and selection hiring competitive examination personnel selection procedures career advancement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barr

(2005, October 11). Veterans’ successful challenge puts outstanding scholar program in jeopardy. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/10/AR2005101001466.html

Chang

Y. Z.

(1942). China and English civil service reform. American Historical Review, 47, 539-544.

DiIulio

J. J.

Jr. (1994). What is deregulating the public service? In DiIulio Jr.

J. J.

(Ed.), Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? (pp. 1-11).Washington, DC: Brookings.

Editors. (1924). Editorials. Public Personnel Studies, 2, 103-104.

Elman

(2009). Civil service examinations. In Cheng

(Ed.), Berkshire encyclopedia of China (pp. 405-410). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.

Fish

C. R.

(1904). The civil service and the patronage. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.

Gallo

Lewis

D. E.

(2011). The consequences of presidential patronage for federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 219-243.

Gigerenzer

Todd

P. M.

, & The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gould

C. I.

(1979). Statement of Clifford I. Gould, deputy director federal personnel and compensation division before the subcommittee on civil service house committee on post office and civil service, on the impact and validity of pace: a federal, employment examination. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.

10.

D. E.

Imai

King

Stuart

E. A.

(2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1-28.

11.

Hobson

(2004). The eastern origins of western civilization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Hoogenboom

(1961). Outlawing the spoils: A history of the Civil Service Reform Movement, 1865-1883. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

13.

Ingraham

P. W.

(1995). The foundation of merit: Public service in American democracy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

14.

Jing

Zhu

(2012). Civil service reform in China: An unfinished task of value balancing. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 134-148.

15.

Johnson

(2015). Service after serving: Does veterans’ preference diminish the quality of the US Federal Service? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 669-696.

16.

Johnson

(2017). The preferential hiring of military veterans in the United States. In Hicks

Coll

J. E.

Weiss

E. L.

(Eds.), The civilian lives of U.S. veterans: Issues and identities (pp. 239-272). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

17.

Johnson

Walker

R. W.

(2018). The career advancement of military veterans in recent cohorts of the U.S. executive branch. Public Personnel Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0091026018783015

18.

Kaufman

(2008). Ruminations on the Study of American Public Bureaucracies. American Review of Public Administration, 38, 256-263.

19.

King

(2012). An explanation of CEM weights. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from j.mp/CEMweights

20.

Knott

J. H.

Miller

G. J.

(1987). Reforming bureaucracy: The politics of institutional choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

21.

Lewis

D. E.

(2007). Testing pendleton’s premise: Do political appointees make worse bureaucrats? Journal of Politics, 69, 1073-1088.

22.

Lewis

G. B.

(1986). Gender and promotions: Promotion chances of White men and women in federal white-collar employment. Journal of Human Resources, 21, 406-419.

23.

Lewis

G. B.

(2013). The impact of veterans’ preference on the composition and quality of the federal service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 247-265.

24.

Miller

J. F.

(1935). Veteran preference in the public service. In Friedrich

C. J.

Beyer

W. C.

Spero

S. D.

Miller

J. F.

Graham

G. A.

(Eds.), Problems of the America public service (pp. 243-244). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

25.

Mosher

F. C.

(1968). Democracy and the public service. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

26.

Mueller

H.-E.

(1984). Bureaucracy, education, and monopoly. Berkeley: University of California Press.

27.

S. S.

Lewis

G. B.

(2013). Performance ratings and career advancement in the US Federal Civil Service. Public Management Review, 1, 740-761.

28.

Poocharoen

O-o.

Brillantes

(2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues, and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 140-163.

29.

Pyper

Burnham

(2011). The British civil service: Perspective son “decline” and “modernisation.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13, 189-205.

30.

Riordan

W. L.

(1905). Plunkitt of tammany hall: A series of very plan talks on very practical politics. New York, NY: McClure Phillips.

31.

Rourke

F. E.

(1992). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52, 539-546.

32.

Savas

E. S.

Ginsburg

S. G.

(1973). The civil service: A meritless system? The Public Interest, 32, 70-85.

33.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hunter

J. E.

(1981). Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 1128-1137.

34.

Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity. (2007). “Veterans’ preference,” house hearing, committee on veterans’ affairs (First Session. Serial No. 110-41). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.

35.

Têng

S.-y.

(1943). Chinese influence on the Western examination system: I. Introduction. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 7, 267-312.

36.

Tsao

K. K.

Worthley

J. A.

(1995). Chinese public administration: Change with continuity during political and economic development. Public Administration Review, 55, 169-174.

37.

U.S. General Services Administration. (2011, April 15). CPO category rating and selection procedures. Retrieved from https://www.gsa.gov/directives-library/category-rating-and-selection-procedures-93371a-cpo

38.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). Federal hiring: OPM needs to improve management and oversight of hiring authorities. Washington, DC: Author.

39.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2000). Restoring merit to federal hiring: Why two special hiring programs should be ended. Washington, DC: Author.

40.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2008a). Federal appointment authorities: Cutting through the confusion. Washington, DC: Author.

41.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2008b). Attracting the next generation: A look at federal entry-level new hires. Washington, DC: Author.

42.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2014). Veteran hiring in the civil service: Practice and perception. Washington, DC: Author.

43.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2015). The impact of recruitment strategy on fair and open competition for federal jobs. Washington, DC: Author.

44.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2007a). Operating manual: The guide to personnel data standards. Washington, DC: Author.

45.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2007b). Delegated examining operations handbook: A guide for federal agency examining offices. Washington, DC: Author.

46.

Van Riper

P. P

. (1958). History of the United States civil service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

47.

Weber

(1948). Bureaucracy. In Gerth

H.H.

Wright Mills

(Eds.), Essays in Sociology (pp. 196-224). Oxford: Routledge.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.20 MB