Research findings have been contradictory with respect to the determinants of why people choose a public sector job. In this article we use an internationally comparative design with data from 26 countries to explain public sector employment preference. The study shows that on the individual level, public service motivation and extrinsic motivation are both important drivers for this preference. Intrinsic motivation, in turn, is negatively related to people’s inclination to work for the public sector. Moreover, having a lower income and lower education is associated with a greater preference for public sector employment. This suggests that working for the public sector is seen as a good and safe career option. Our results furthermore show that variation in this preference can only partly be explained by country differences. Nevertheless, in countries with a career- rather than position-based system of public employment, people are more likely to prefer public employment.
Points for practitioners
Attracting the best and brightest to work for the public sector requires an insight into why people prefer public over private sector employment. This article looks at what makes people prefer public sector employment in 26 countries. Findings reveal that public service motivation (helping other people, being useful to society) and extrinsic motives (job security, a high income, opportunities for advancement) play an important role in this preference. Still, there are considerable differences between countries. In countries with a career-based system of public employment, working in the public sector is seen as more attractive.
AdamchikVBediAS (2000) Wage differentials between the public and the private sectors: Evidence from an economy in transition. Labor Economics7(2): 203–224.
2.
BenderKA (1998) The central government–private sector wage differential. Journal of Economic Surveys12(2): 177–220.
3.
BorjasGJ (2002) The wage structure and the sorting of workers into the public sector. NBER Working Paper 9313, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
BoudarbatB (2008) Job-search strategies and the unemployment of university graduates in Morocco. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics14: 15–33.
5.
BuelensMVan den BroeckH (2007) An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review67(1): 65–74.
6.
ChristensenRKWrightBE (2011) The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person–organization fit and person–job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21(4): 723–743.
7.
CrewsonPE (1997) Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7(4): 499–518.
8.
DelfgaauwJDurR (2008) Incentives and workers’ motivation in the public sector. The Economic Journal118(525): 171–191.
9.
DoeringerPPioreMJ (1971) Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Adjustment, New York: D.C. Heath and Company.
GornickJCJacobsJA (1998) Gender, the welfare state, and public employment: A comparative study of seven industrialized countries. American Sociological Review63(5): 688–710.
12.
GroeneveldSMSteijnBVan der ParreP (2009) Joining the Dutch Civil Service: Influencing motives in a changing economic context. Public Management Review11(2): 173–189.
13.
GundersonM (1979) Earnings differentials between the public and private sectors. Canadian Journal of Economics12(2): 228–242.
14.
GuoGZhaoH (2000) Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology6: 441–462.
15.
HammerschmidGMeyerREDemmkeC (2007) Public administration modernization: Common reform trends or different paths and national understandings in the EU countries. In: SchedlerKProellerI (eds) Cultural Aspects of Public Management Reform, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 145–169.
16.
HerzbergF (1966) Work and the Nature of Man, Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.
17.
HoustonDJ (2000) Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(4): 713–728.
18.
HoustonDJ (2011) Implications of occupational locus and focus for public service motivation: Attitudes toward work motives across nations. Public Administration Review71(5): 761–771.
19.
HuangXVan de VliertE (2003) Where intrinsic job satisfaction fails to work: National moderators of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior24(2): 159–179.
20.
ISSP (International Social Survey Programme) (2005a) Study Descriptions for Participating countries, Mannheim: GESIS.
21.
ISSP (International Social Survey Programme) (2005b) Work Orientation III Dataset, Mannheim: GESIS.
22.
Jilke S, Meuleman B and Van de Walle S (forthcoming) We need to compare, but how? Measurement equivalence in comparative public administration. Public Administration Review.
23.
JinM (2013a) Comparing employed and unemployed workers’ job motivations for sector choice in East Asia: Does employment status matter?International Journal of Public Administration36(5): 305–319.
24.
JinM (2013b) Public service motivation: A cross-country study. International Journal of Public Administration36(5): 331–343.
25.
KjeldsenAMJacobsenCB (2013) Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory23(4): 899–926.
26.
KonradAMRitchieJELiebPCorrigalE (2000) Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin126(4): 593–641.
27.
KooijDTAMDe LangeAHJansenPGWKanferRDikkersJSE (2011) Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour32(2): 197–225.
28.
KuperusHRodeA (2008) Top public managers in Europe: Management and working conditions of the senior civil servants in the European Union member states. Study commissioned by the French EU presidency, Maastricht: EIPA.
29.
LathamGP (2007) Work Motivation. History, Theory, Research and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
LewisGBFrankSA (2002) Who wants to work for the government?Public Administration Review62(4): 395–404.
31.
LlorensJJStazykEC (2011) How important are competitive wages? Exploring the impact of relative wage rates on employee turnover in state government. Review of Public Personnel Administration31(2): 111–127.
32.
NiskanenWA (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
33.
NorrisP (2003) Is there still a public service ethos? Work values, experience, and job satisfaction among government workers. In: DonahueJDNyeJSJr (eds) For the People: Can We Fix Public Service?, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
OECD (2005) Modernising Government: The Way Forward, Paris: OECD.
35.
OECD (2009) Government at a Glance, Paris: OECD.
36.
Perry JL and Hondeghem A (eds) (2008) Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
PerryJLWiseLR (1990) The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review50(3): 367–373.
38.
RiphahnRTSerflingO (2005) Item non-response on income and wealth questions. Empirical Economics30(2): 521–538.
39.
RitzAWaldnerC (2011) Competing for future leaders: A study of attractiveness of public sector organizations to potential job applicants. Review of Public Personnel Administration31(3): 291–316.
40.
RosseelE (1985) Work ethic and orientations to work of the young generations: The impact of educational level. Social Indicators Research17(2): 171–187.
41.
ScholzEHarknessJFaaßT (2008) ISSP study monitoring 2005, report to the ISSP General Assembly on monitoring work undertaken for the ISSP. GESIS-Methodenberichte, 2008/04, Mannheim: GESIS.
42.
SimonHA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics69(1): 99–118.
43.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, London: Sage.
44.
StegmuellerD (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A Monte Carlo study comparing Bayesian and frequentist approaches. American Journal of Political Science57(3): 748–761.
45.
SteijnB (2008) Person–environment fit and public service motivation. International Public Management Journal11(1): 13–27.
46.
TanselA (2005) Public–private employment choice, wage differentials, and gender in Turkey. Economic Development and Cultural Change53(2): 453–477.
47.
TaylorJTaylorR (2011) Working hard for more money or working hard to make a difference? Efficiency wages, public service motivation, and effort. Review of Public Personnel Administration31(1): 67–86.
48.
TaylorJWestoverJH (2011) Job satisfaction in the public service. Public Management Review8(1): 1–21.
49.
TeorellJDahlströmCDahlbergS (2011) The QoG Expert Survey Dataset, University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
50.
TolbertPSMoenP (1998) Men’s and women’s definitions of ‘good’ jobs: Similarities and differences by age and across time. Work and Occupations25(2): 168–194.
51.
VandenabeeleW (2008) Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration86(4): 1089–1105.
52.
WestoverJHTaylorJ (2010) International differences in job satisfaction: The effects of public service motivation, rewards and work relations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management59(8): 811–828.
53.
World Bank (2005) Senior Public Service: High Performing Managers of Government, Washington, DC: World Bank.
54.
WrightBEChristensenRK (2010) Public service motivation: A test of the job attraction-selection-attrition model. International Public Management Journal13(2): 155–176.
