This comparative study of over 3,600 public servants across China, Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, India, and the United States examines the influence of material and nonmaterial job attributes and cultural factors on employees’ perceptions of job productivity. Compared to the U.S. respondents, the respondents from Asia Pacific reported higher levels on one dimension of job productivity (perceived job efficiency) but lower levels on another dimension (perceived job effectiveness). Like their American counterparts, the perceived job productivity of Asia Pacific respondents was affected more by their satisfaction with nonmaterial job attributes than their satisfaction with material job attributes. Three distinctive national cultural factors were found to affect perceived job productivity: social ties, personal responsibility, and group focus.
AhmadA. S. B. (1997, 11-13May). Public administration reforms in Malaysia: A developing country perspective. Governance: Promoting Sound Development Management. Paper presented at 30th Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of Asian Development Bank, Sea Hawk Hotel, Fukuoka, Japan.
2.
AlderP. S.KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
3.
BermanE. M. (2006). Performance and productivity in public and nonprofit organizations (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
4.
Brown JohnsonN.DroegeS.(2004). Reflections on the generalizations of agency theory: Cross-cultural considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 325-335.
5.
BuelensM.Van den BroeckH. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65-74.
6.
BurnsJ. P.BowonwathanaP. (2001). Civil service systems in Asia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
7.
ChenC. C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 408-428.
8.
ChiangF. F. T.BirtchT. A. (2007). The transferability of management practices: Examining cross-national differences in reward preferences. Human Relations, 60, 1293-1330.
9.
ChiangF. F. T.BirtchT. A. (2011). The performance implications of financial and non-financial rewards: An Asian Nordic comparison. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01018.x
10.
DahlR. A. (1947). The science of public administration: Three problems. Public Administration Review, 7(1), 1-11.
11.
DeSantisV. S.DurstS. L. (1996). Comparing job satisfaction among public- and private-sector employees. American Review of Public Administration, 26, 327-339.
12.
EbyL. T.DobbinsG. H. (1997). Collective orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275-295.
13.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
14.
EndrigaJ. N. (2001). The national civil service system of the Philippines. In BurnsJ. P.BowonwathanaP. (Eds.), Civil service systems in Asia (pp. 212-248). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
15.
FieldA. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London, UK: SAGE.
16.
FisherC. D.YuanA. X. Y. (1998). What motivates employees? A comparison of US and Chinese responses. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 516-528.
17.
FisherJ. G.MainesL. A.PefferS. A.SprinkleG. B. (2005). An experimental investigation of employer discretion in employee performance evaluation and compensation. The Accounting Review, 80, 563-583.
18.
FrankS. A.LewisG. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 36-51.
19.
HatryH. P. (1978). The status of productivity measurement in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 38(1), 28-33.
20.
HerzbergF. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.
21.
HofstedeG. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
22.
HofstedeG. (2007). Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 411-420.
23.
HoustonD. J.2000. Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 713-727.
24.
International Labor Organization (ILO, 2011). ILO database on conditions of work and employment laws. Geneva Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/dyn/travail
25.
KamocheK. (2000). From boom to bust: The challenges of managing people in Thailand. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 452-468.
26.
LangbeinL. I.LewisG. B. (1998). Pay, productivity, and the public sector: The case of electrical engineers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 391-412.
27.
LeeS.McCannD.MessengerJ. C. (2007). Working time around the world: Trends in working hours, laws, and policies in a global comparative perspective. London, UK: Routledge and ILO.
28.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
29.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
30.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70, 681-690.
31.
RaineyH. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.
32.
ShapiroC.StiglitzJ. E. (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review, 74, 433-444.
33.
TaylorJ. (2003). A higher education perspective of linking performance indicators to extrinsic rewards: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(1), 13-31
34.
TaylorJ. (2008). Organizational influences, public service motivation and work outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 67-88.
35.
TaylorJ. (2011). Improving productivity through efficiency wages: The case of the civil service. In LamN. M. K.ScottI. (Eds.), Gaming, governance and public policy in Macao (pp. 107-125). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
36.
TaylorJ.TaylorR. (2011). Working hard for more money or working hard to make a difference? Efficiency wages, public service motivation and effort. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 67-86.
37.
TaylorJ.WestoverJ. (2011). Job satisfaction in the public service: The effects of public service motivation, workplace attributes and work relations. Public Management Review, 13, 731-751.
38.
TriandisH. C.BontempoR.VillarealM. J.AsaiM.LuccaN. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives of self-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
39.
VandenabeeleW.HondeghemA.SteenT.ParysM. (2002). De Roep van de Vlaamse Overheid—Arbeidsorientaties van Hooggeschoolden in Vlaanderen en het Imago van de Overheid [The call of Flemish government: Labor orientations of university graduates in Flanders and the image of government]. Brugge, Belgium: Die Keure.
40.
VroomV. H. (1964) Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Wiley.
41.
WrightB. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 11, 559-586.
