The defining characteristic of modern public service—insulation of civil servants from political manipulation and protection of the public from partisan administration of the law—is undergoing change as a result of contemporary civil service reform. It is in this context that “little” state Hatch Acts, laws modeled after the 1939 federal statute, are examined. This exploratory analysis reports survey and interview data from officials charged with implementing their state's law to gauge its effectiveness in today's reform era. After a review of the literature and a description of the methodology, the findings are presented, followed by a discussion of their implications for the future.
Anderson, H. (2006, October 22). Non-Nebraska funding for SOS unfortunately reaches new level. Omaha World-Herald. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.omaha.com
2.
Battaglio, P., & Condrey, S. (2006). Civil service reform: Examining state and local government cases. Review of Public Personnel Administration , 26(2), 118-138.
3.
Bloch, S.J. (2005, Winter). The judgment of history: Faction, political machines, and the Hatch Act. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 7, 225-277.
4.
Bowman, J., & West, J. (2007). American public service: Radical reform and the merit system. New York: Taylor & Francis.
5.
Bowman, J., & West, J. (in press). To re-Hatch public employees or not? An ethical analysis of the relaxation of restrictions on political activities in civil service . Public Administration Review.
6.
Boyle, L. (1990-1991). Reforming civil service reform: Should the federal government continue to regulate state and local government employees?Journal of Law and Politics, 7(2), 243-288.
7.
Brown, A. (2000). Public employee political participation: Hatch acts in the federal and state governments. Public Integrity , 2, 105-119.
8.
Condrey, S., & Maranto, R. (2001). Radical reform of the civil service. New York: Lexington Books.
9.
Cordes, H. (2006, October 27). Lid backer alleges misuse of resources . Omaha World-Herald, p. 5B.
10.
Denhardt, R., & Denhardt, J. (2002). The new public service: Serving, not steering . Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
11.
Donahue, J., & Nye, J. (Eds.). (2003). For the people: Can we fix the public service?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
Ferrara, J., & Ross, L. (2005). Getting to know you: Rules of engagement for political appointees and career executives. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
13.
Freidman, J. (2007, September 13). Watchdog agency seeks extra funds for Hatch Act probe. Government Executive.com. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.governmentexecutive.com
14.
Hays, S., & Sowa, J. (2006). Changes in state civil service systems: A national survey. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 102-117.
15.
Heclo, H. (2000). The future of merit. In J. Pfiffner & D. Brook (Eds.), The future of merit: Twenty years after the Civil Service Reform Act (pp. 226-238). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Hicks, N. (2006a, October 16). Spending lid backers accuse school employees of foul play. Lincoln Journal Star, p. 1B.
17.
Hicks, N. (2006b, November 8). Spending lid goes down. JournalStar.com. Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/11/08/elections/2006/november/doc455166917cef6041789485
18.
Huber, G. (2007). The craft of bureaucratic neutrality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Ignatius, D. (2007, March 23). An inside-the-Bushies mentality. Washington Post, p. A17.
20.
Ingraham, P., Selden, S., & Moynihan, D. (2000). People and performance: Challenges for the future of public service. Public Administration Review, 60(1), 54-60.
21.
Kamarck, E. (2007). The end of government as we know it: Making public policy work. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
22.
Kellough, J., & Nigro, N. (Eds.). (2006). Civil service reform in the states. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Kline, R., & Tobias, R. (1991). The Hatch Act: Broaden employee rights? The Bureaucrat, 20, 3-8.
24.
Maranto, R. (2005). Beyond a government of strangers: How career executives and political appointees can turn conflict into cooperation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
Meier, K., & O'Toole, L. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
National Commission on the Public Service. ( 2003). Urgent business of America: Revitalizing the federal government for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
O'Hanlon, K. (2006, October 27). Lid backers: Taxes used to fight lid . Lincoln Journal Star, p. 1B.
28.
Pearson, W. (1978, September). The effect of state Hatch acts on state executives' political activities. Southern Review of Public Administration, 2, 221-238.
29.
Pearson, W., & Castle, D. (1990). Political activity among state executives: The effect of Hatch Act repeal. Public Personnel Management, 19(4), 399-409.
30.
Pearson, W., & Castle, D. (1991). Liberalizing restrictions on political activities of state employees: Perceptions of high-level state executives. American Review of Public Administration, 21(2), 91-105.
31.
Pfiffner, J., & Brook, D. (Eds.). (2000). The future of merit: Twenty years after the Civil Service Reform Act. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Pulliam, D. (2007, May 29). Government-wide Hatch Act Probe remains in early stages. Government Executive. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.govexec.com
33.
Snead, J. (2001). An inquiry into the chilling effects of stringent little Hatch Act prohibitions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 21, 259-283.
34.
Stoddard, M. (2006, September 25). Spending lid sparks battles. Omaha World-Herald. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.thebell.org/PUBS/coverage/2006/09-Init423Nebraska.pdf
35.
Thurber, K., Jr. (1993). Big, little, littler: Synthesizing Hatch Act-based political activity legislation research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13, 39-51.
36.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2005 ). Merit principles survey. Washington, DC : Author.
37.
Walters, J. (2002). Life after civil service reform: The Texas, Georgia, and Florida experiences. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
