Supplanting civil service systems’ procedural protections with at-will employment policies is a recent and important phenomenon in public service. This article examines the state of Texas, an at-will employer. It reports a 2005 survey of the state's human resource directors focusing on the at-will doctrine and its use and effects. Respondents agreed that at-will employment enhances employee responsiveness to agency administrators but held mixed opinion of its effects on other employee behaviors (e.g., risk taking, whistle-blowing, decision making, sensitivity to issues of fairness) and agency performance. The article calls for governments to take a more holistic view of at-will employment when considering its adoption.
Barrett, K., & Greene, R. (1999). Grading the states. Governing, 12(5), 17-90.
2.
Barrett, K., & Greene, R. (2005). Grading the states ’05: A management report card. Governing, 18(5), 24-95.
3.
Bowman, J. S. (2002). At-will employment in Florida: A naked formula to corrupt public service. WorkingUSA, 6(2), 90-102.
4.
Bowman, J. S., Gertz, M. G., Gertz, S. C., & Williams, R. L. (2003). Civil service reform in Florida state government: Employee attitudes one year later. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23, 286-304.
5.
Callahan, E. S. (1990). Employment at will: The relationship between societal expectations and the law. American Business Law Journal, 28, 455-484.
6.
Coggburn, J. D. (2006). The decentralized and deregulated approach to state human resources management in Texas. In J. E. Kellough & L. N. Nigro (Eds.), Civil service reform in the states: Personnel policies and politics at the sub-national level(pp. 203-237). New York: State University of New York Press.
7.
Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (1994). The overregulated civil service: The case of New York City's public personnel system. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24(2), 10-27.
8.
Condrey, S. E., & Maranto, R. (2001). Radical reform of the civil service. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
9.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Kessler, I. (2003). The employment relationship in the U.K. public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 213-230.
10.
Daley, D. M. (2002). Strategic human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Denhardt, R. (1993). The pursuit of significance. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
12.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
13.
Dunn, K. (2000). Texas employers: Rest assured—Your employees serve at will. Corporate Counsel Review, 19(1). Retrieved November 11, 2004, from http://www.stcl.edu/students/articles.htm
14.
Gossett, C. W. (2003). The changing face of Georgia's merit system: Results from an employee attitude survey in the Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. Public Personnel Management, 32, 267-278.
15.
Green, R., Golden, A., Forbis, R., Nelson, S., & Robinson, J. (in press). On the ethics of at-will employment relations in the public sector. Public Integrity.
16.
Hindera, J. L., & Josephson, J. J. (1998). Reinventing the public employer-employee relationship: The just cause standard. Public Administration Quarterly, 22(1), 98-113.
17.
Horner, C. (1988, Spring). Beyond Mr. Gradgrind: The case for deregulating the public sector. Policy Review, 44, 34-38.
18.
Jos, P. H., Hays, S. W., & Tompkins, M. E. (1989). In praise of difficult people: A portrait of the committed whistleblower. Public Administration Review, 49, 552-561.
19.
Kearney, R. C., & Hays, S. W. (1998). Reinventing government, the new public management and civil service systems in international perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 38-54.
20.
Kellough, J. E. (1999). Reinventing public personnel management: Ethical implications for managers and public personnel systems. Public Personnel Management, 28, 655-671.
21.
Kettl, D. F., Ingraham, P. W., Sanders, R. P., & Horner, C. (1996). Civil service reform: Building a government that works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
Kuykendall, C. L., & Facer, R. L. II (2002). Public employment in Georgia agencies: The elimination of the merit system. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(2), 133-145.
23.
Lasseter, R. W. (2002). Georgia's merit system reform 1996-2001: An operating agency's perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(2), 125-132.
24.
Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?Public Administration Review, 62, 395-404.
25.
Muhl, C. J. (2001). The employment-at-will doctrine: Three major exceptions. Monthly Labor Review, 124(1), 3-11.
26.
National Commission on the Public Service (1989). Leadership for America: Rebuilding the public service. Lexington, MA: Heath.
27.
National Commission on the State and Local Public Service (1993). Hard truths/tough choices: An agenda for state and local reform. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute.
28.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.
Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
30.
Radin, T. J., & Werhane, P. H. (1996). The public/private distinction and the political status of employment. American Business Law Journal, 34, 245-260.
31.
Roehling, M. V. (2003). The employment at-will doctrine: Second level ethical issues and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 115-124.
32.
Roehling, M. V., & Winters, D. (2000). Job security rights: The effects of specific policies and practices on the evaluation of employers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12(1), 25-38.
33.
Roehling, M. V., & Wright, P. (2004). Organizationally sensible vs. legal-centric responses to the eroding employment at-will doctrine. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16(2), 89-103.
34.
Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex. 1985).
35.
Savas, E. S., & Ginsburg, S. G. (1973, Summer). The civil service: A meritless system?The Public Interest, 32, 70-85.
36.
Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of employment-at-will policies and compensation policies on corporate image and job pursuit intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 653-656.
37.
Selden, S. C., Ingraham, P. W., & Jacobson, W. (2001). Human resource practices in state government: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 61, 598-607.
38.
State Classification Office. (2004). Texas human resource management statutes inventory. Austin, TX: State Auditor's Office. Retrieved March 15, 2005, from http://www.hr.state.tx.us/Rules/HRInventoryFinal.pdf
39.
State Classification Office. (2005). An annual report on full-time classified state employee turnover for fiscal year 2005. Austin, TX: State Auditor's Office. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.hr.state.tx.us/Workforce/Turnover2005/Default.html
40.
Stephens, D. B., & Kohl, J. P. (1988). The “new” status of termination-at-will in Texas: Guidelines for employers in the aftermath of Sabine Pilot v. Hauck. Southwest Journal of Business and Economics, 6(1), 13-25.
41.
Walters, J. (2002). Life after civil service reform: The Texas, Georgia, and Florida experiences. Arlington, VA: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
42.
Walters, J. (2003). Civil service reform tsunami. Governing, 16(8), 34-40.
43.
Werhane, P. H. (1999). Justice and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(2/3), 237-249.
44.
Woodard, C. A. (2005). Merit by any other name—Reframing the civil service first principle. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 109-116.
