Lifting the Curtain on Motivation in Exercise: Validation of Two Questionnaires for Physical Education and Leisure Time in French and German

Abstract

The increase of cross-cultural studies and intervention programs, based on the self-determination theory, highlights the urge for validated scales to ensure high-quality research, particularly in the domain of physical education. The present study aimed at evaluating the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the revised Perceived Locus of Causality Scale (PLOC-R) in physical education and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-II) during leisure-time translations from English into German and French among youth. Data obtained from 1808 Luxemburgish students supported the five-factor structure of the translated PLOC-R as well as for the BREQ-II and showed good internal reliability as well as concurrent, discriminant, and nomological validity. Measurement invariance analyses across the two languages revealed configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance for both questionnaires. The findings provide promising evidence for the reliability and validity of the translated PLOC-R and BREQ-II and support their use in cross-cultural and physical activity–related motivational research.

Keywords

self-determination theory motivation physical education measurement invariance youth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boateng

G. O.

Neilands

T. B.

Frongillo

E. A.

Melgar-Quiñonez

H. R.

Young

S. L.

(2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

Muthén

(1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456-466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834

Curran

P. J.

Bollen

K. A.

Chen

Paxton

Kirby

J. B.

(2003). Finite sampling properties of the point estimates and confidence intervals of the RMSEA. Sociological Methods & Research, 32(2), 208-252. doi:10.1177/0049124103256130

D'Abundo

M. L.

Sidman

C. L.

Milroy

Orsini

Fiala

(2014). Construct validity of college students' responses to the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire (BREQ- 2). Recreational Sports Journal, 38(1), 40-49. doi:10.1123/rsj.2013-0006

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic Motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Eremenco

S. L.

Cella

Arnold

B. J.

(2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(2), 212-232. doi:10.1177/0163278705275342

Godfrey

Kim

Eluère

Eys

(2019). Diversity in cultural diversity research: A scoping review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2019.1616316

Goudas

Biddle

Fox

(1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 453-463. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01116.x

10.

Guthold

Stevens

G. A.

Riley

L. M.

Bull

F. C.

(2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(1), 23-35. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2

11.

Hagger

M. S.

Chatzisarantis

N. L. D.

(2016). The trans-contextual model of autonomous motivation in education. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 360-407. doi:10.3102/0034654315585005

12.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

13.

Janssen

LeBlanc

A. G.

(2010). Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(1), 40. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-40

14.

Lonsdale

Sabiston

C. M.

Taylor

I. M.

Ntoumanis

(2011). Measuring student motivation for physical education: Examining the psychometric properties of the perceived locus of causality questionnaire and the situational motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 284-292. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.003

15.

LUCET . (2019). Online assessment system OASYS (version 2). Luxembourg, LU: University of Luxembourg.

16.

Markland

Tobin

(2004). A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26(2), 191-196. doi:10.1123/jsep.26.2.191

17.

Marsh

H. W.

(2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. Handbook of Sport Psychology, 3, 774-798. doi:10.1002/9781118270011.ch35

18.

Mathisen

F. K. S.

Kokko

Tynjälä

Torsheim

Wold

(2019). Leisure‐time physical activity and participation in organized sports: Changes from 1985 to 2014 in Finland and Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 29, 1232-1242. doi:10.1111/sms.13431

19.

Mullan

Markland

Ingledew

D. K.

(1997). A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analytic procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 745-752. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00107-4

20.

Ntoumanis

Standage

(2009). Motivation in physical education classes. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 194-202. doi:10.1177/1477878509104324

21.

Putnick

D. L.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

22.

R Core Team . (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

23.

Rutten

Boen

Seghers

(2013). The relation between environmental factors and pedometer-determined physical activity in children: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Pediatric Exercise Science, 25(2), 273-287. doi:10.1123/pes.25.2.273

24.

Ryan

R. M.

Connell

J. P.

(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

25.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243-248. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y

26.

Steenkamp

J. B. E. M.

Baumgartner

(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross‐national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-107. doi:10.1086/209528

27.

Taber

K. S.

(2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

28.

Trigueros

Mínguez

L. A.

González-Bernal

J. J.

Jahouh

Soto-Camara

Aguilar-Parra

J. M.

(2019). Influence of teaching style on physical education adolescents' motivation and health-related lifestyle. Nutrients, 11(11), 2594. doi:10.3390/nu11112594

29.

Trigueros

Sicilia

Alcaraz-Ibáñez

Dumitru

D. C.

(2017). Spanish adaptation and validation of the revised perceived locus of causality scale in physical education. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 17(1), 25-32.

30.

Vallerand

R. J.

Pelletier

L. G.

Blais

M. R.

Briere

N. M.

Senecal

Vallieres

E. F.

(1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003- 1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025

31.

Vaske

J. J.

Beaman

Sponarski

C. C.

(2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach's alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163-173. doi:10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189

32.

Verloigne

De Bourdeaudhuij

Tanghe

D'Hondt

Theuwis

Vansteenkiste

Deforche

(2011). Self-determined motivation towards physical activity in adolescents treated for obesity: An observational study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), 97. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-97

33.

Vlachopoulos

S. P.

Katartzi

E. S.

Kontou

M. G.

Moustaka

F. C.

Goudas

(2011). The revised perceived locus of causality in physical education scale: Psychometric evaluation among youth. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 583-592. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.003

34.

Wallhead

T. L.

Ntoumanis

(2004). Effects of a sport education intervention on students' motivational responses in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23(1). 4-18, doi:10.1123/jtpe.23.1.4

35.

Wang

J. C. K.

Hagger

Liu

W. C.

(2009). A cross-cultural validation of perceived locus of causality scale in physical education context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 313-325. doi:10.1080/02701367.2009.10599566

36.

Wilson

P. M.

Rodgers

W. M.

Fraser

S. N.

(2002). Examining the psychometric properties of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6(1), 1-21. doi:10.1207/S15327841MPEE0601_1