Research on teacher–student relationships is mainly based on questionnaires investigating teachers’ explicit cognitions. However, it is also important to investigate implicit processes in social interactions, such as internalized feelings. The Teacher Relationship Interview (TRI) is a narrative method aimed at assessing teachers’ (implicit) mental representations of dyadic teacher–student relationships. The TRI may provide—for researchers as well as practitioners—a deeper understanding of teachers’ implicit cognitive and emotional processes elicited in teacher–student relationships, which can be useful for psychodiagnostic assessment and relationship-focused consultation with teachers. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the TRI in a special education sample of students with symptoms of attachment disorders (N = 80). Expected interrelations of the TRI scales were found with a widely used questionnaire of teacher–student relationships, independent observations of teacher–student interactions, and teacher perceptions of student behavior.
BorelliJ. L.WestJ. L.DecosteC.SuchmanN. E. (2012). Emotion language in the parenting interviews of substance-dependent mothers: Associations with reflective functioning, recent substance use, and parenting behavior. Infant Mental Health Journal, 33, 506-519. doi:10.1002/imhj.21340
2.
BosmansG.KernsK. (2015). Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 148, 1-14. doi:10.1002/cad.20100
3.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969)
4.
ButtonS.PiantaR. C.MarvinR. S. (2001). Mothers’ representations of relationships with their children: Relations with parenting behavior, mother characteristics, and child disability status. Social Development, 10, 455-472. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00175
5.
ChangM. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193-218. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y
6.
CicchettiD.BronenR.SpencerS.HautS.BergA.OliverP.TyrerP. (2006). Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: Resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 557-564. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000230392.83607.c5
7.
ClementeM.RamírezE. (2008). How teachers express their knowledge through narrative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1244-1258.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
CornelissenG.VerschuerenK. (2001). Nederlandse vertaling van de Teacher-Rating-Scale-of-School-Adjustment (TSSRA) [Dutch translation of the Teacher-Rating-Scale-of-School-Adjustment]. Leuven: Centrum voor schoolpsychologie, KU Leuven.
10.
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
11.
DoumenS.KoomenH.BuyseE.WoutersS.VerschuerenK. (2012). Teacher and observer views on student–teacher relationships: Convergence across kindergarten and relations with student engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 61-76. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.004
12.
DoumenS.VerschuerenK.BuyseE.GermeijsV.LuyckxK.SoenensB. (2008). Reciprocal relations between teacher–child conflict and aggressive behavior in kindergarten: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 588-599. doi:10.1080/15374410802148079
13.
GavishB. (2017). Special education trainee teachers’ perceptions of their professional world: Motives, roles, and expectations from teacher training. Teachers and Teaching, 23, 153-170. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1204285
14.
GeorgeC.SolomonJ. (1996). Representational models of relationships: Links between caregiving and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17, 198-216. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199623)17:3<198:: AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-L
15.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
16.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345. doi:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
17.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625-638.
18.
KoomenH. M. Y.LontT. A. E. (2004). Teacher relationship interview: Qualitative coding manual (Ongepubliceerde Nederlandse vertaling). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit Amsterdam.
19.
KoomenH. M. Y.van LeeuwenM. G. P.van der LeijA. (2004). Does well-being contribute to performance? Emotional security, teacher support, and learning behaviour in kindergarten. Infant and Child Development, 13, 253-275.
20.
KoomenH. M. Y.VerschuerenK.PiantaR. C. (2007). Leerling Leerkracht Relatie Vragenlijst-handleiding [Manual of Student Teacher Relationship Scale]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
21.
KoomenH. M. Y.VerschuerenK.ThijsJ. T. (2006). Assessing aspects of the teacher-child relationship: A critical ingredient of a practice-oriented psycho-diagnostic approach. Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 50-60.
22.
KoomenH. M. Y.VerschuerenK.van SchootenE.JakS.PiantaR. C. (2012). Validating the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Testing factor structure and measurement invariance across child gender and age in a Dutch sample. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 215-234. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.001
23.
La ParoK. M.PiantaR. C.StuhlmanM. W. (2002). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
24.
LaddG. W. (1992). The Teacher Rating Scale of School Adjustment. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
25.
LaddG. W.BurgessK. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment?Child Development, 72, 1579-1601. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00366
26.
MainM.KaplanN.CassidyJ. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66-104. doi:10.2307/3333827
27.
McGrathK. F.Van BergenP. (2015). Who, when, why and to what end? Students at risk of negative student–teacher relationships and their outcomes. Educational Research Review, 14, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.12.001
28.
PiantaR. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
PiantaR. C. (2001). Student-teacher relationship scale: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
30.
PiantaR. C.HamreB.StuhlmanM. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 199-234). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0710.
31.
SchwartzE.DavisA. S. (2006). Reactive attachment disorder: Implications for school readiness and school functioning. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 471-479. doi:10.1002/pits.20161
32.
SpiltJ. L.KoomenH. M. Y. (2009). Widening the view on teacher–child relationships: Teachers’ narratives concerning disruptive versus non-disruptive children. School Psychology Review, 38, 86-101.
33.
SpiltJ. L.KoomenH. M. Y.ThijsJ.van der LeijA. (2012). Supporting teachers’ relationships with disruptive children: The potential of relationship-focused reflection. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 305-318. doi:10.1080/14616734.2012.672286
34.
StuhlmanM. W.PiantaR. C. (2002). Teachers’ narratives about their relationships with children: Associations with behavior in classrooms. School Psychology Review, 31, 148-163.
35.
ThijsJ. T.KoomenH. M. Y. (2008). Task-related interactions between kindergarten children and their teachers: The role of emotional security. Infant and Child Development, 17, 181-197. doi:10.1002/icd.552
36.
ThijsJ. T.KoomenH. M. Y. (2009). Toward a further understanding of teachers’ reports of early teacher–child relationships: Examining the roles of behavior appraisals and attributions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 186-197. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.03.001
37.
Van LeeuwenK.MeerschaertT.BosmansG.De MedtsL.BraetC. (2006). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 189-197. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.189
38.
VerschuerenK.KoomenH. M. Y. (2012). Teacher–child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 205-211. doi:10.1080/14616734.2012.672260
39.
VerschuerenK.Van de WaterG.BuyseE.DoumenS. (2006). Adaptation of the classroom assessment scoring system-kindergarten to measure the individual teacher-child relationship [in Dutch]. Leuven: Centrum voor Schoolpsychologie, KU Leuven.
40.
VervoortE.VerschuerenK.BosmansG. (2013). Teacher-child relationships and indiscriminate fr iendliness in early elementary school children: Measurement, challenges, and protective effects [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. KU Leuven, Faculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen, School- en Ontwikkelingspsychologie van Kind en Adolescent, Leuven.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
