This study further examined the reliability and validity of the Learning Alliance Inventory (LAI), a self-report measure designed to assess the working alliance between a student and a teacher. The LAI was found to have good internal consistency and test–retest reliability, and it demonstrated the predicted convergence with measures of immediacy and rapport. The LAI enhanced the prediction of student learning beyond that which was possible only using measures of immediacy and rapport. Path analysis provided support for immediacy and rapport indirectly impacting student learning via their effects on the working alliance. Potential uses of the LAI in both research and applied contexts are discussed.
AllenM.WittP. L.WheelesL. R. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55, 21–31. doi:10.1080/03634520500343368
2.
AndersonR. P.AndersonG. V. (1962). Development of an instrument for measuring rapport. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 41, 18–24.
3.
BensonT. A.CohenA. L.BuskistW. (2005). Rapport: Its relation to student attitudes and behaviors toward teachers and classes. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 237–239. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3204_8
4.
BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885
5.
BurroughsN. F. (2007). A reinvestigation of the relationship of teacher nonverbal immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning. Communication Education, 56, 453–475. doi:10.1080/03634520701530896
6.
CareyJ. C.HamiltonD. L.ShanklinG. (1986). Development of an instrument to measure rapport between college roommates. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 269–273.
7.
CastonguayL. G.ConstantinoM. J.HoltforthM. G. (2006). The working alliance: Where are we and where should we go?Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 271–279. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.271
8.
FrisbyB. N.MartinM. M. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164.
9.
GoodboyA. K.MyersS. A. (2009). The relationship between perceived instructor immediacy and student challenge behavior. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36, 108–112.
10.
GranitzN. A.KoernigS. K.HarichK. R. (2009). Now it’s personal: Antecedents and outcomes of rapport between business faculty and their students. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 52–65. doi:10.1177/0273475308326408
11.
GremlerD. D.GwinnerK. P. (2008). Rapport-building behaviors used by retail employees. Journal of Retailing, 84, 308–324. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.07.001
12.
HakeR. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809
13.
HarriganJ. A.RosenthalR. (1983). Physicians’ head and body positions as determinants of perceived rapport. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 496–509. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02332.x
14.
HessJ. A.SmytheM. J. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning?Communication Studies, 52, 197–219.
HorvathA. O.SymondsB. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.
17.
KearneyP.PlaxT. G.SmithV. R.SorensenG. (1988). Effects of teacher immediacy and strategy type on college student resistance to on-task demands. Communication Education, 37, 54–67. doi:10.1080/03634528809378703
18.
KearneyP.PlaxT. G.BurroughsN. F. (1991). An attributional analysis of college students’ resistance decisions. Communication Education, 40, 325–342. doi:10.1080/03634529109378858
19.
KochL. (2004). The student-teaching working alliance in rehabilitation counselor education. Rehabilitation Education, 18, 235–242.
20.
KramerU.de RotenY.BerettaV.MichelL.DesplandJ. (2009). Alliance patterns over the course of short-term dynamic psychotherapy: The shape of productive relationships. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 699–706. doi:10.1080/10503300902956742
21.
MartinD. J.GarskeJ. P.DavisM. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438
22.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C. (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 101–119). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
MurphyE.Rodríguez-ManzanaresM. A. (2012). Rapport in distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 167–190.
25.
MyersS. A. (2008). Working alliances in college classrooms. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 29–32. doi:10.1080/00986280701818490
26.
RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C.JohnsonA. D. (2003). Development of the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 504–517.
27.
RobertsonD. L. (2000). Enriching the scholarship of teaching: Determining appropriate cross-professional applications among teaching, counseling, and psychotherapy. Innovative Higher Education, 25, 111–125.
28.
RodríguezJ. I.PlaxT. G.KearneyP. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293–305.
29.
RogersD. T. (2009). The working alliance in teaching and learning: Theoretical clarity and research implications. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3. Retrieved fromhttp://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/index.htm
30.
RogersD. T. (2012). The Learning Alliance Inventory: Instrument development and validation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6. Retrieved fromhttp://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/index.htm
31.
RyanR. G.WilsonJ. H.PughJ. L. (2011). Psychometric characteristics of the Professor-Student Rapport Scale. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 135–141. doi:10.1177/0098628311411894
32.
SchlosserL. Z.GelsoC. J. (2001). Measuring the working alliance in advisor–advisee relationships in graduate school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 157–167. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.157
33.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
34.
TiberiusR. G.SinaiJ.FlakE. A. (2002). The role of teacher-learner relationships in medical education. In NormanG. R.Van der VleutenC. P. M.NewbleD. I. (Eds.), International handbook of research in medical education (pp. 463–497). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_19
35.
WilsonJ. H.RyanR. G. (2013). Professor–Student Rapport Scale: Six items predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 40, 130–133. doi:10.1177/0098628312475033
36.
WilsonJ. H.RyanR. G.PughJ. L. (2010). Professor-Student Rapport Scale predicts student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 246–251. doi:10.1080/00986283.2010.510976
