Recently adopted state standards for middle grades and high school mathematics content have an increased emphasis on statistical topics. With this change, teacher education programs may need to adapt how they prepare preservice secondary mathematics teachers (PSMTs) to teach statistics and require measures related to statistics teaching to assess the impact of programmatic changes and track teacher growth. Using responses from a sample of 290 PSMTs from 20 institutions across the United States, this study presents validity and reliability evidence for the high school version of the Self-Efficacy to Teach Statistics (SETS-HS), which could be used to assess statistics teaching efficacy. Confirmatory factor analysis results via Rasch modeling support the use of three subscales, which exhibit adequate reliabilities and correspond to the three levels in the Pre-K–12 Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education endorsed by the American Statistical Association. Item and rating scale analyses indicate that the 46 items and the six-category scale employed in the SETS-HS perform as intended.
AdamsR. J.WilsonM.WangW. C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1-23.
2.
AdamsR. J.WuM. L.WilsonM. R. (2015). ACER ConQuest: Generalized item response modeling software (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
3.
AkaikeH. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In PetrovB. N.CsakiF. (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
4.
AshtonP. T. (1985). Motivation and the teacher’s sense of efficacy. In AmesC.AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 2, pp. 141-171). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from https://amte.net/standards
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
8.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In PajaresT. U. F. (Ed.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
9.
BatesA. B.LathamN.KimJ. (2011). Linking pre-service teachers’ mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics teaching efficacy to their mathematical performance. School Science & Mathematics, 111, 325-333.
10.
BriggsD. C.WilsonM. (2003). An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 87-100.
11.
BursalM.PaznokasL. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and preservice elementary teachers’ confidence to teach mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 173-180.
12.
DemboM. H.GibsonS. (1985). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 173-184.
13.
DuffinL. C.FrenchB. F.PatrickH. (2012). The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 28, 827-834.
14.
EnochsL. G.SmithP. L.HuinkerD. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument. School Science & Mathematics, 100, 194-202.
15.
FinneyS. J.SchrawG. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 161-186.
16.
FitzmauriceO.LeavyA.HanniganA. (2014). Why is statistics perceived as difficult and can practiceduring training change perceptions? Insights from a prospective mathematics teacher. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 33, 230–248.
17.
FivesH.BuehlM. M. (2010). Examining the factor structure of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 118-134.
18.
FranklinC.BargagliottiA. E.CaseC. A.KaderG. D.SchaefferR. L.SpanglerD. A. (2015). The statistical education of teachers. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
19.
FranklinC.KaderG.MewbornD.MorenoJ.PeckR.PerryM.ScheafferR. (2007). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) report: A pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
20.
FrielS. N.CurcioF. R.BrightG. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 124-158.
21.
GreshmanG. (2008). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy in elementary pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 19, 171-184.
22.
HackettG.BetzN. E. (1989). An exploration of mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273.
23.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.LovettJ. N.PierceR. L.SortoM. A.LeeH. L.LesserL. M. (2017). The middle grades SETS instrument: Psychometric comparison of middle and high school pre-service mathematics teachers. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
24.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.SortoM. A.PierceR. L.LesserL. M.MurphyT. J. (2014a, July). Using the SETS instruments to investigate sources of variation in levels of pre-service teacher efficacy to teach statistics. In MakarK.de SousaB.GouldR. (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9, July 2014) Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Available at https://icots.info/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_C270_HARRELLWILLIAMS.pdf
25.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.SortoM. A.PierceR. L.LesserL. M.MurphyT. J. (2014b). Validation of scores from a new measure of preservice teachers’ self-efficacy to teach statistics in the middle grades. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 40-50. doi:10.1177/0734282913486256
26.
IrakleousP.PanaouraA. (2015). Personal teaching efficacy in teaching statistics: A case study. Mathitudes, 1(1), 1-18.
JacobbeT.CaseC.WhitakerD.FotiS. (2014, July). Establishing the validity of the LOCUS assessments through an evidenced-centered design approach. In MakarK.de SousaB.GouldR. (Eds.), Sustainability in Statistics Education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9, July 2014) Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Available at: https://icots.info/icots/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_7C2_JACOBBE.pdf
29.
KnoblauchN. A.Woolfolk HoyA. (2008). “Maybe I can teach those kids.” The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy belief. Teaching & Teacher Education, 24, 166-179. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.05.005
30.
LinacreJ. M. (2004). Optimal rating scale category effectiveness. In Smith Jr.E. V.SmithR. M. (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 258-278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
LovettJ. N. (2016). The preparedness of preservice secondary mathematics teachers to teach statistics: A cross-institutional mixed methods study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University, Raleigh. Available at: https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/handle/1840.16/11008
33.
LovettJ. N.LeeH. S. (2017). New standards require teaching more statistics: Are preservice secondary mathematics teachers ready?Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 299-311.
34.
McGeeJ. R.WangC. (2014). Validity-supported evidence of the Self-Efficacy for Teaching Mathematics Instrument. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 390-403. doi:10.1177/0734282913516280
35.
McGeeJ. R.WangC.PollyD. (2013). Guiding teachers in the use of a standards-based mathematics curriculum: Teacher perceptions and subsequent instructional practices after an intensive professional development program. School Science & Mathematics, 113, 16-28. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00172.x
36.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person’s responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1994.tb01618.x
37.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practice & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
PajaresF. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In MaehrM.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
39.
PielJ. A.GreenM. (1993). Attitudes toward five subject areas: A comparison of elementary education and noneducation majors. North Carolina Journal of Teacher Education, 6, 28-37.
40.
PollyD.McGeeJ. R.WangC.LambertR. G.PugaleeD. K.JohnsonS. (2013). The association between teachers’ beliefs, enacted practices, and student learning in mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 22(2), 11-30.
41.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociology Methodology, 25, 111-195. doi:10.2307/271063
42.
SchwarzG. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
43.
SmithA. B.RushR.FallowfieldL. J.VelikovaG.SharpeM. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 33. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-33
44.
SwarsS. L.DaaneC. J.GiesenJ. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: What is the relationship in elementary pre-service teachers?School Science & Mathematics, 106, 306-315. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17921.x
45.
TaieS.GoldringR. (2017). Characteristics of public elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2015–16 National Teacher and Principal Survey First Look (NCES 2017-072). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017072
WilburneJ. M.LongM. (2010). Secondary pre-service teachers’ content knowledge for state assessments: Implications for mathematics education programs. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1, 1-13.
48.
WolfeE. W.SmithE. V.Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II—Validation activities. In SmithE. V.Jr.SmithR. M. (Eds.), Rasch measurement: Advanced and specialized applications (pp. 243-290). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
