Entitlement in Higher Education: Evaluating the Measurement Invariance Properties of the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire

Abstract

Self-report instruments are commonly used in the educational and behavioral sciences. The purpose of this study was to investigate the measurement invariance properties of the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire (AEQ) developed by Kopp, Zinn, Finney, and Jurich, across gender and college rank (i.e., lower classmen, upper classmen, and graduate students). Partial metric and scalar invariance was established for the AEQ across gender. In relation to college rank, partial metric invariance was met, but scalar invariance did not hold. The results of the study may benefit educational researchers who are interested in using the AEQ or examining attributes that may be associated with academic entitlement.

Keywords

structural equation modeling measurement gender personality/individual differences university-college/adult social and educational environment educational psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achacoso

M. V.

(2002). What do you mean my grade is not an A? An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin). Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/2486

Boswell

S. S.

(2012). “I deserve success”: Academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy, social networking, and demographic variables. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 353-365.

Cain

Romanelli

Smith

K. M.

(2012). Academic entitlement in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, 1-8.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(1998). Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 6, 93-110.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.

Ciani

K. D.

Summers

J. J.

Easter

M. A.

(2008). Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169, 332-344.

Dubovsky

S. L.

(1986). Coping with entitlement in medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 315, 1672-1674.

French

Finch

(2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 378-402.

10.

Greenberger

Lessard

Chen

Farruggia

S. P.

(2008). Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1193-1204.

11.

Khojasteh

(2015). Investigating the sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices to detect measurement invariance in a bifactor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 531-541.

12.

Kline

R. B.

(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

13.

Kopp

J. P.

Finney

S. J.

(2013). Linking academic entitlement and student incivility using latent means modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 322-336.

14.

Kopp

J. P.

Zinn

T. E.

Finney

S. J.

Jurich

D. P.

(2011). The development and evaluation of the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 105-129.

15.

Meade

A. W.

Johnson

E. C.

Braddy

P. W.

(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592.

16.

Hersch

R. H.

Merrow

(Eds.). (2005). Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. Learning Matters. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

17.

Millsap

R. E.

Kwok

(2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9, 93-115.

18.

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [R Foundation for Statistical Computing]. Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.R-project.org/

19.

Reise

S. P.

Widaman

K. F.

Pugh

R. H.

(1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.

20.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.

21.

Sessoms

Finney

S. J.

Kopp

J. P.

(2016). Does the measurement or magnitude of academic entitlement change over time? Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49, 243-257.

22.

Shapiro

P. D.

(2012). Entitled to cheat: An examination of incoming freshmen at a small regional university. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 4(1), 1-15.

23.

Shelly

P. H.

(2005, January 7). Colleges need to give students intensive care. The Chronicle Review of Higher Education. Available from http://chronicle.com

24.

Singleton-Jackson

J. A.

Jackson

D. L.

Reinhardt

(2010). Students as consumers of knowledge: Are they buying what we’re selling? Innovative Higher Education, 35, 343-358.

25.

Steenkamp

J. E. M.

Baumgartner

(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.

26.

Vandenburg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.