The class climate is acknowledged as being related to student learning. Students learn more in classrooms that are supportive and caring. However, there are few class climate instruments at the elementary school level. The aim of the current study was to assess the measurement invariance of a recently developed scale in a different context (New Zealand) from where it was developed (the United States) and across different ethnic groups. A total of 1,924 elementary school students (963 males and 961 females) participated. Students completed the Student Personal Perception of Classroom Climate (SPPCC). Results of the invariance tests of the SPPCC across four ethnic samples (New Zealand European, Māori, Pasifika, and Asian) indicated that the SPPCC represented the same four factors in classroom climate for each of these groups (configural invariance). Results also revealed that full metric invariance was supported although only partial scalar invariance was achieved because of a lack of invariance in the thresholds for five items. Therefore, this study provided empirical support for the SPPCC when used within a new context and with different ethnic groups. Future studies to enhance the usability of the SPPCC are discussed.
AndermanL. H.PatrickH.HrudaL. Z.LinnenbrinkE. A. (2002). Observing classroom goal structures to clarify and expand goal theory. In MidgleyC. (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 243-294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics (Mplus Web Notes No. 10). Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote10.pdf
3.
BabadE. (2009). The social psychology of the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
5.
BishopR.BerrymanM. (2006). Culture speaks: Cultural relationships and classroom learning. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia.
6.
Brophy-HerbH. E.LeeR. E.NievarM. A.StollakG. (2007). Preschoolers’ social competence: Relations to family characteristics, teacher behaviors, and classroom climate. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 134-148.
7.
BullenP.Rubie-DaviesC. M. (2013). Impact of culture on educational and psychological measurement [Special issue]. International Journal of Quantitative Measurement in Education, 1, 123-127.
8.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
9.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
10.
ChenY.-H.Rendina-GobioffG.DedrickR. F. (2007, November). Detecting effects of positively and negatively worded items on a Self-Concept Scale for third and sixth grade elementary students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Educational Research Association, Tampa, FL.
11.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
12.
DeciE.RyanR. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
13.
EnnisC. D. (1998). Shared expectations: Creating a joint vision for urban schools. In BrophyJ. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom (pp. 151-182). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
FraserB. J. (1986). Classroom environment. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
15.
FraserB. J.AndersonG. J.WalbergH. J. (1982). Assessment of learning environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) and My Class Inventory (MCI). Perth: Western Australian Institute of Technology.
16.
FraserB. J.GiddingsG. J.McRobbieC. J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399-422.
17.
FreemanK. E.GutmanL. M.MidgleyC. (2002). Can achievement goal theory enhance our understanding of the motivation and performance of African American young adolescents? In MidgleyC. (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 176-204). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
FurrerC.SkinnerE. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
19.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
20.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625-638.
21.
HarterS. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver Press.
22.
HattieJ. A. C. (2008). Narrow the gap, fix the tail, or close the curves: The power of words. In Rubie-DaviesC. M.RawlinsonC. (Eds.), Challenging thinking about teaching and learning (pp. 19-23). New York, NY: Nova Science.
23.
HattieJ. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses. London, England: Routledge.
24.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
25.
HornstraL.van der VeenI.PeetsmaT.VolmanM. (2013). Developments in motivation and achievement during primary school: A longitudinal study on group-specific differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 195-204.
26.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
27.
HuebnerE. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149-158.
28.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.AndersonD. (1983). Social interdependence and classroom climate. Journal of Psychology, 114, 135-142.
29.
KingR. B.McInerneyD. M. (2014). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49, 175-198. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.926813
30.
LubkeG. H.MuthénB. O. (2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514-534.
31.
MarshH. W. (1990). Self description questionnaire. Campbelltown, NSW, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
32.
McCormickM. P.O’ConnorE. E.CappellaE.McClowryS. G. (2013). Teacher-child relationships and academic achievement: A multilevel propensity score model approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 611-624.
33.
McKownC.WeinsteinR. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235-261.
34.
MilfontT. L.FischerR. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111-121.
35.
MillsapR. E. (2012). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
36.
MoosR. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
NunnL. M. (2011). Classrooms as racialized spaces: Dynamics of collaboration, tension, and student attitudes in urban and suburban high schools. Urban Education, 46, 1226-1255. doi:10.1177/0042085911413146
40.
PetersonP. L.WalbergH. J. (1979). Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
41.
RoeserR. W.EcclesJ. S.SameroffA. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443-471.
42.
RoweE. W.KimS.BakerJ. A.KamphausR. W.HorneA. M. (2010). Student personal perception of classroom climate: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 858-879.
43.
Rubie-DaviesC. M. (2015). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. London, England: Routledge.
44.
Rubie-DaviesC. M.PetersonE. R. (2011). Teacher expectations and beliefs: Influences on the socioemotional climate. In Rubie-DaviesC. M. (Ed.), Educational psychology: Concepts, research and challenges (pp. 134-149). London, England: Routledge.
45.
SassD. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347-363.
46.
SchmittN.KuljaninG. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210-222.
47.
SchweinleA.MimsG. A. (2009). Mathematics self-efficacy: Stereotype threat versus resilience. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 12, 501-514.
48.
StarkS.ChernyshenkoO. S.DrasgowF. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1292-1306.
TaylorP. B.FraserB. J.FisherD. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293-302.
52.
TeoT.FanX. (2013). Coefficient alpha and beyond: Issues and alternatives for educational research. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 209-213.
53.
UrdanT.SchoenfelderE. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349.
54.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.
55.
WalbergH. J. (1979). Educational environments and effects: Evaluation, policy, and productivity. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
56.
WeinsteinR. S. (2002). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
WuA. D.LiZ.ZumboB. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(3). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=13
58.
YangY.GreenS. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 377-392.
59.
YuC. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). University of California Los Angeles.
60.
ZumboB. D. (2003). Does item-level DIF manifest itself in scale-level analyses? Implications for translating language tests. Language Testing, 20, 136-147.
61.
ZushoA.ClaytonK. (2011). Culturalizing achievement goal theory and research. Educational Psychologist, 46, 239-260. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.614526
