This study examined the psychometric properties of the Teacher Well-Being Scale, which assesses three factors of teachers’ work-related well-being: workload, organizational, and student interaction well-being. With a sample of Canadian teachers, results confirmed the reliability, approximate normality, and factor structure of the scale; provided support for a higher order factor of teacher well-being; showed the instrument functioned similarly across different sociodemographic subgroups; and demonstrated the well-being factors were related as expected with external constructs of teacher stress, job satisfaction, and general well-being. Combined, these analyses provide support for the use of the instrument as an assessment of teacher well-being and evidence of the importance of teacher well-being for other teacher outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AbelM. H.SewellJ. (1999). Stress and burnout in rural and urban secondary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 287-293. doi:10.1080/00220679909597608
2.
AeltermanA.EngelsN.Van PetegemK.Pierre VerhaegheJ. (2007). The well-being of teachers in Flanders: The importance of a supportive school culture. Educational Studies, 33, 285-297. doi:10.1080/03055690701423085
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4.
ChaplainR. P. (2008). Stress and psychological distress among trainee secondary teachers in England. Educational Psychology, 28(2), 195-209.
5.
CollieR. J. (2014). Understanding teacher well-being and motivation: Measurement, theory, and change over time. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/46025
6.
CollieR. J.ShapkaJ. D.PerryN. E.MartinA. J. (2015). Teachers’ well-being, motivation, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Effects of perceived autonomy support and need satisfaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
BoyleG. J.BorgM. G.FalzonJ. M.BaglioniA. J. (1995). A structural model of the dimensions of teacher stress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 49-67.
8.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.BorgogniL.StecaP. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821-832.
9.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
10.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
11.
Clunies-RossP.LittleE.KienhuisM. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour. Educational Psychology, 28, 693-710. doi:10.1080/01443410802206700
12.
CollieR. J.ShapkaJ. D.PerryN. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189-1204. doi:10.1037/a0029356
13.
DienerE. (2009). Conclusion—The well-being science needed now. Social Indicators Research Series, 37, 267-271. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_10
14.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
15.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D.SeligmanM. E. P. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 540-547. doi:10.1080/17439760903157232
16.
ErvastiJ.KivimäkiM.PenttiJ.SuominenS.VahteraJ.VirtanenM. (2011). Sickness absence among Finnish special and general education teachers. Occupational Medicine, 61, 465-471. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr087
17.
GevingA. M. (2007). Identifying the types of student and teacher behaviours associated with teacher stress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 624-640. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.006
18.
GloriaC.FaulkK.SteinhardtM. (2013). Positive affectivity predicts successful and unsuccessful adaptation to stress. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 185-193. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9291-8
19.
HuppertF.SoT. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837-861. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
20.
IngersollR. M.MayH. (2012). The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 435-464. doi:10.3102/0162373712454326
21.
KlassenR. M.ChiuM. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 114-129. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.002
22.
KlassenR. M.FosterR. Y.RajaniS.BowmanC. (2009). Teaching in the Yukon: Exploring teachers’ efficacy beliefs, stress, and job satisfaction in a remote setting. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 381-394.
23.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
24.
KonuA.ViitanenE.LintonenT. (2010). Teachers’ wellbeing and perceptions of leadership practices. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 7, 44-57. doi:10.1108/17538351011031939
25.
KunterM.KlusmannU.BaumertJ.RichterD.VossT.HachfeldA. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805-820. doi:10.1037/a0032583
26.
MarshH. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172. doi:10.1007/BF01322177
27.
McDonaldR. P.MarshH. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
28.
McInerneyD. M.GanoticeF. A.KingR. B.MorinA. J. S.MarshH. W. (2014). Teachers’ commitment and psychological well-being: Implications of self-beliefs for teaching in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.895801
29.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Teacher statistics: 2011/12. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Author.
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2013). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
31.
PakarinenE.KiuruN.LerkkanenM.PoikkeusA.SiekkienM.NurmiJ. (2010). Classroom organization and teacher stress predict learning motivation in kindergarten children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 281-300. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0025-6
32.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4-36. doi:10.3102/0002831212463813
33.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In ChirkovV. I.RyanR. M.SheldonK. M. (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 45-64). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8_3
34.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
35.
SharrocksL. (2014). School staff perceptions of well-being and experience of an intervention to promote well-being. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30, 19-36. doi:10.1080/02667363.2013.868787
36.
SpiltJ. L.KoomenH. Y.ThijsJ. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457-477. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y
37.
TovW.DienerE. (2009). The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In DienerE. (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 155-173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_7
38.
Van HornJ. E.TarisT. W.SchaufeliW. B.SchreursP. J. G. (2004). The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 365-375. doi:10.1348/0963179041752718
