The present study examined the psychometric equivalence of administering a computer-based version of the Gifted Rating Scale (GRS) compared with the traditional paper-and-pencil GRS-School Form (GRS-S). The GRS-S is a teacher-completed rating scale used in gifted assessment. The GRS-Electronic Form provides an alternative method of administering and completing the 72-item scale, which eases scoring and interpretation of the measure. The GRS-E reduces the potential for human error by implementing automated scoring. An automated form may increase the likelihood that the measure is utilized, supporting wider screening in the schools for gifted identification. Five of the six subscales were completed by teachers in matched pairs on 185 students. Results indicate strong internal consistency across both administration forms and no significant difference in mean scores. This study contributes to the growing body of literature in support of the psychometric equivalence of paper-and-pencil report forms administered in a computer-based environment.
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
BirnbaumM. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-832. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
3.
BrockR. L.BarryR. A.LawrenceE.DeyJ.RolffsJ. (2012). Internet administration of paper-and-pencil questionnaires used in couple research: Assessing psychometric equivalence. Assessment, 19, 226-242. doi:10.1177/1073191110382850
4.
CarlbringP.BruntS.BohmanS.AustinD.RichardsJ.ÖstL.-G.AnderssonG. (2007). Internet vs. paper-and-pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1421-1434. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.05.002
5.
CoyneI.BartramD. (2006). Design and development of the ITC guidelines on computer-based and Internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6, 133-142. doi:10.1207/s1532757-4ijt0602_3
DavidovE.DepnerF. (2011). Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 45, 375-390. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9297-9
9.
DixonP. (2013). International aid and private schools for the poor. North Hampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
10.
HewsonC.CharltonJ. P. (2005). Measuring health beliefs on the Internet: A comparison of paper and Internet administrations of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 691-702. doi:10.3758/BF03192742
11.
International Test Comission (ITC) Guidelines. (2005). International guidelines on computer-based and Internet delivered testing. Retrieved from http://www.intestcom.org/upload/sitefiles/62.pdf
12.
LiH.LeeD.PfeifferS. I.KamataA.KumtepeA. T.RosadoJ. (2009). Measurement invariance of the Gifted Rating Scales–School Form across five cultural groups. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 186-198. doi:10.1037/a0017382
13.
LohmanD. F. (2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29, 32-40.
14.
MarguliesA. S.FloydR. G. (2004). Review of Gifted Rating Scales (GRS) [Review of the book Gifted Rating Scales (GRS), by S. I. Pfeiffer & T. Jarosewich]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 275-282. doi:10.1177/073428290402200306
15.
MeadeA. W.MichelsL. C.LautenschlagerG. J. (2007). Are Internet and paper-and-pencil personality tests truly comparable? An experimental design measurement invariance study. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 322-345. doi:10.1177/1094428106289393
16.
NaglieriJ. A.DrasgowF.SchmitM.HandlerL.PrifiteraA.MargolisA.VelasquezR. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychologist, 59, 150-162. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.3.150
17.
PfeifferS. I. (2012). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 3-9. doi:10.1177/0734282911428192
18.
PfeifferS. I. (2013). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
PfeifferS. I. (2015). Essentials of gifted assessment. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
20.
PfeifferS. I.BleiS. (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test: Rating scales and other assessment procedures. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 177-198). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_10
21.
PfeifferS. I.JarosewichT. (2003). The Gifted Rating Scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
22.
PfeifferS. I.JarosewichT. (2007). The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 39-50. doi:10.1177/0016986206296658
23.
PfeifferS. I.PetscherY. (2008). Identifying young gifted children using the Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 19-29. doi:10.1177/0016986207311055
24.
PfeifferS. I.PetscherY.KumtepeA. (2008). The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: A validation study based on age, gender and race. Roeper Review, 30, 140-146. doi:10.1080/02783190801955418
25.
PreckelF.ThiemannH. (2003). Online- versus paper-pencil version of a high potential intelligence test. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 62, 131-138. doi:10.1024//1421-0185.62.2.131
26.
RosadoJ. I.PfeifferS.PetscherY. (2015). Identifying gifted students in Puerto Rico: Validation of a Spanish translation of the Gifted Rating Scales. Gifted Education International, 31, 162-175. doi:10.1177/026142941350-7178
27.
WardS. A. (2005). Review of the Gifted Rating Scales. In SpiesB. A.PlakeB. S. (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 404-407). Lincoln, NE: Euros Institute of Mental Measurements.
28.
WardS. A. (2007). Review of gifted rating scales. In GeisingerK. F.SpiesR. A.CarlsonJ. F.PlakeB. S. (Eds.), The seventeenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 731-734). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement, University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
