The Working Memory Rating Scale (WMRS) was designed as a behavioral rating tool to assist teachers in identifying students at risk of working memory difficulties. The instrument was originally normed on 417 monolingual English-speaking children from the United Kingdom. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the WMRS on 459 first- to third-grade Spanish-speaking English Language Learners. Results indicated the one-factor model demonstrated adequate fit to the data. High convergent validity emerged with the Conners’ rating scale, but weak correlations occurred with achievement, vocabulary, phonological, short-term memory, and working memory measures. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
AllowayT. P.AllowayR. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 20-29. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003
2.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.KirkwoodH. J. (2008). Working Memory Rating Scale. London, England: Pearson Assessment.
3.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.KirkwoodH. J.ElliottJ. (2009). The Working Memory Rating Scale: A classroom-based behavioral assessment of working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 242-245. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.003
4.
AudS.HussarW.KenaG.BiancoK.FrohlichL.KempJ.TahanK. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NCES 2011-033, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
BaddeleyA. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49, 5-28. doi:10.1080/027249896392784
6.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. A. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 47-89.
8.
BrownellK. (2001). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Therapy.
9.
ConnersC. K. (2001). Conners’ Rating Scale–Revised: Technical manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
10.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001158
11.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1981). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
12.
DunnL. M.LugoD. E.PadillaE. R.DunnL. M. (1986). Test de Vocabulario Imagenes Peabody [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test]. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
13.
FeeleyT. H. (2002). Comment on halo effects in rating and evaluation research. Human Communication Research, 28, 578-586.
14.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J. (2001). Working memory deficits in children with special educational needs. British Journal of Special Education, 28, 89-97.
15.
GottardoA.YanB.SiegelL. S.Wade-WooleyL. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530-542. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.530
16.
HammillD.MathersN.RobertsR. (2001). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17.
HemphillF. C.VannemanA. (2011). Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES 2011-459). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
18.
LeafstedtJ. M.GerberM. M. (2005). Crossover of phonological processing skills: A study of Spanish-speaking students in two instructional settings. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 226-235. doi:10.1177/07419325050260040501
19.
MessickS. (1989). Validity. In LinnR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
20.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA.HowerterA. H. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
21.
RavenJ. C. (1976). Colored progressive matrices. London, England: H.K. Lewis.
22.
St Clair-ThompsonH. (2014). Establishing the reliability and validity of a computerized assessment of children’s working memory for use in group settings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 15-26. doi:0734282913497344
23.
SwansonH. L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 473-488. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.84.473
24.
SwansonH. L. (2008). Working memory and intelligence in children: What develops?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 581-602. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.581
25.
SwansonH. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471-491. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.471
26.
SwansonH. L.OroscoM.LussierC.GerberM.Guzman-OrthD. (2011). The influence of working memory and phonological processing on English language learner children’s bilingual reading and language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 838-856. doi:10.1037/a0024578
27.
SwansonH. L.SáezL.GerberM. (2006). Growth in literacy and cognition in bilingual children at risk or not at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 247-264.
28.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (2000). The comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
29.
WechslerD. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
30.
WilkinsonG. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
31.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Revised (Form G). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
32.
WoodcockR. W.Muñoz-SandovalA. F.AlveradoC. G. (2005). Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
33.
YoungJ. W. (2009). A framework for test validity research on content assessments taken by English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14, 122-138.
34.
YoungJ. W.ChoY.LingG.ClineF.SteinbergJ.StoneE. (2008). Validity and fairness of state standards-based assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 13, 170-192. doi:10.1080/10627190802394388
35.
ZimmermanD. W.ZumboB. D.LalondeC. (1993). Coefficient alpha as an estimate of test reliability under violation of two assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 33-49. doi:10.1177/0013164493053001003
