Children’s early motor competence is associated with social development and academic achievement. However, few studies have examined teacher reports of children’s motor skills. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Motor Skills Rating Scale (MSRS), a 19-item measure of children’s teacher-reported motor skills in the classroom. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) support the validity of the three-factor structure of MSRS. The subscales of the MSRS were also associated with child academic and behavioral outcomes, with differences in the associations depending on the subscale. Only the Classroom Fine Motor skills subscale was uniquely associated with academic knowledge and mathematics achievement, whereas Body Awareness and Shapes and Letters were not significantly associated with either of the academic outcomes. Implications of the findings are discussed.
BeeryK. E.BuktenicaN. A.BeeryN. A. (2010). Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (6th ed., BEERY™ VMI). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
2.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3.
BronsonM. B. (1994). The usefulness of an observational measure of young children’s social and mastery behaviors in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 19-43.
4.
CameronC. E.BrockL. G.MurrahW. R.BellL.WorzallaS.GrissmerD. W.MorrisonF. J. (2012). Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child Development, 83, 1229-1244.
5.
CameronC. E.ChenW.BlodgettJ.CottoneE.MashburnA. J.BrockL. L.GrissmerD. (2012). Preliminary validation of the Motor Skills Rating Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 555-566.
6.
CarlsonA. G.RoweE. W.CurbyT. W. (2013). Disentangling fine motor skills’ relation to academic achievement: The differential impact of visual-spatial integration and visual motor coordination. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 175, 514-533.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
ConnollyA. J. (2008). Key Math 3 diagnostic assessment. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
9.
DiamondA. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71, 44-56.
10.
DuncanG.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.…JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428-1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
11.
FarrellA. D. (1994). Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: Strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 477-487.
12.
Floyer-LeaA.MatthewsP. M. (2004). Changing brain networks for visuomotor control with increased movement automaticity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 2405-2412.
13.
GreshamF. M.ElliotS. M. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
14.
GrissmerD.GrimmK. J.AiyerS. M.MurrahW. M.SteeleJ. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: Two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1008-1017. doi:10.1037/a0020104
15.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
KorkmanM.KirkU.FellmanV. (1998). NEPSY: A developmental neuropsychological assessment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
17.
LeiP.WuQ. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Madison, WI: National Council on Measurement in Education.
18.
MacCallumR. C.AustinJ. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
19.
MashburnA. J.HamreB. K.DownerJ. T.PiantaR. C. (2006). Teacher and classroom characteristics associated with teachers’ ratings of prekindergartners’ relationships and behaviors. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 367-380.
20.
MatherN.WoodcockR. W. (2001). Examiner’s manual for the Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
21.
MuthénB. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132.
22.
MuthénB. O.du ToitS. H. C.SpisicD. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/bmuthen/articles/Article_075.pdf
23.
MuthénL.MuthénB. (2012). Mplus Version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
24.
PaganiL. S.MessierS. (2012). Links between motor skills and indicators of school readiness at kindergarten entry in urban disadvantaged children. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 2, 95-107.
25.
PedhazurE.SchmelkinL. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
PiantaR. C.Kraft-SayreM. E. (2003). Successful kindergarten transition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under sub-optimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373.
28.
SakizG.PapeS. J.HoyA. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms?Journal of School Psychology, 50, 235-255.
29.
SekinoY.FantuzzoJ. (2005). Validity of the Child Observation Record: An investigation of the relationship between COR dimensions and social-emotional and cognitive outcomes for Head Start children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 242-260.
30.
SonS. H.MeiselsS. J. (2006). The relationship of young children’s motor skills to later reading and math achievement. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 755-778. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0033
31.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. C. (1980, May30). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
32.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
33.
Van ProoijenJ.Van Der KlootW. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777-792.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
36.
YuC. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3066425)
