The present study explored the credentialing practices for bilingual school psychologists in the United States. Credentialing agencies of school psychologists, mostly State Departments of Education, across the 50 states and the District of Columbia were contacted via telephone by trained graduate student research assistants. Only two of the credentialing agencies that were contacted reported that their states (New York and Illinois) provided a specific credential for bilingual school psychologists. A careful review of the requirements for each state revealed a lack of agreement regarding how these practitioners should be trained. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research in this area are discussed.
ArmisteadL. D.CastilloJ. M.CurtisM. J.ChappelA.CunnighamJ. (2013). School psychologists’ continuing professional development preferences and practices. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 415-432. doi:10.1002/pits.21684
2.
CloptonK. L.HaselhuhnC. W. (2009). School psychology trainer shortage in the USA: Current status and projections for the future. School Psychology International, 30, 24-42. doi:10.1177/0143034308101848
3.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
FaganT. K.Sachs WiseP. (2007). School psychology: Past, present, and future (3rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
6.
FlanaganD. P.McGrewK. S.OrtizS. O. (2000). The Wechsler intelligence scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
McCardleP.Mele-McCarthyJ.CuttingL.LeosK.D’EmilioT. (2005). Learning disabilities in English language learners: Identifying the issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 1-5. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00114.x
8.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Standards for school psychology: Ethical and professional practices for school psychologists. Bethesda, MD: Author.
National Education Association. (2007). Truth in labeling: Disproportionality in special education. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
NewellM. L.NastassiB. K.HatzichristouC.JonesJ. M.SchandingG. T.YetterG. (2010). Evidence on multicultural training in school psychology: Recommendations for future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 249-278. doi:10.1037/a0021542
15.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107–110, USC § 115, Stat. 1425. (2002).
16.
O’BryonE. C.RogersM. R. (2010). Bilingual school psychologists’ assessment practices with English language learners. Psychology in the Schools. 47, 1018-1034.
17.
OchoaS.H.RiveraB.D.FordL (1997). An investigation of school psychology training pertaining to bilingual psycho-educational assessment of primarily Hispanic students: Twenty-five years after Diana v. California. Journal of School Psychology, 35(4), 329-349.
OrtizS. O. (2009). Bilingual-multicultural assessment with the WISC-IV. In FlanaganD. P.KaufmanA. S. (Eds.), Essentials of WISC-IV assessment, second edition (pp. 295-309). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
20.
Sotelo-DynegaM.DixonS. G. (2014). Cognitive assessment practices: A survey of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 51(10), 1031-1045.x.
21.
SullivanA.L. A. L. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners.Exceptional Children, 77, 317-334.
22.
UrbinaS. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
23.
WorrellT. G.SkaggsG. E.BrownM. B. (2006). School psychologists job satisfaction: A 22 year perspective in the USA. School Psychology International, 27, 131-145. doi:10.1177/0143034306064540
