This study reports on the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Homework Management Scale (HMS). The HMS was designed to assess students’ homework management strategies. Based on a randomized split of 884 high school students in China, we conducted exploratory factor analysis on Group 1 (n = 442) and confirmatory factor analysis on Group 2 (n = 442). The factor structure of the Chinese version of the HMS was consistent with the original one developed in the United States (i.e., the existence of five separate, yet related, subscales). Reliability coefficients of the HMS and its subscales were in the adequate to good range. Finally, the HMS and its subscales, as predicted, were related to relevant homework measures in the theoretically expected directions. These findings suggest that the Chinese version of the HMS is a valid multidimensional measure for homework management. Suggestions for its application and future research are provided.
BentlerP. M. (2006). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
2.
BoekaertsM.CornoL. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199-231.
3.
BoekaertsM.MaesS.KarolyP. (2005). Self-regulation across domains of applied psychology: Is there an emerging consensus?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 149-154.
4.
ByrneB. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872-882.
5.
CarminesE. G.McIverJ. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In BohrnstedtG. W.BorgattaE. F. (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
ChenC.StevensonH. W. (1989). Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60, 551-561.
7.
ChenC.UttalD. H. (1988). Cultural values, parents’ beliefs, and children’s achievement in the United States and China. Human Development, 31, 351-358.
8.
CooperH.LindsayJ. J.NyeB.GreathouseS. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70-83.
9.
CooperH.RobinsonJ. C.PatallE. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62.
10.
CornoL. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elementary School Journal, 100, 529-548.
11.
CornoL. (2004). Introduction to the special issuework habits and work styles: Volition in education. Teachers College Record, 106, 1669-1694.
12.
CornoL.XuJ. (2004). Doing homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43, 227-233.
13.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
14.
HairJ. F.Jr.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
HensonR. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
16.
HensonR. K.RobertsJ. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393-416.
17.
HongE.PengY.RowellL. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 269-276.
18.
HongE.WanM.PengY. (2011). Discrepancies between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 280-308.
19.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
20.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
KouzmaN. M.KennedyG. A. (2002). Homework, stress, and mood disturbance in senior high school students. Psychological Reports, 91, 193-198.
22.
LiN.KirkupG. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Interne use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48, 301-317.
23.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff value for fit indexes and dangers on overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.
24.
PowerT. J.DombrowskiS. C.WatkinsM. W.MautoneJ. A.EagleJ. W. (2007). Assessing children’s homework performance: Development of multi-dimensional, multi-informant rating scales. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 333-348.
25.
TrautweinU.LudtkeO.SchnyderI.NiggliA. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438-456.
26.
VermaS.SharmaD.LarsonR. W. (2002). School stress in India: Effects on time and daily emotions. International Journal of Behavior Development, 26, 500-508.
27.
WangD. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese and US students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 40-54.
28.
WartonP. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165.
29.
XuJ. (2004). Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1786-1803.
30.
XuJ. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46-55.
31.
XuJ. (2007). Middle school homework management: More than just gender and family involvement. Educational Psychology, 27, 171-187.
32.
XuJ. (2008a). Models of secondary students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180-1205.
33.
XuJ. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 304-324.
34.
XuJ. (2010). Homework purpose scale for high school students: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 459-476.
35.
XuJ. (2011). Homework completion at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 171-182.
36.
XuJ.CornoL. (1998). Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100, 402-436.
37.
XuJ.CornoL. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 503-518.
38.
XuJ.DuJ.FanX. (2013). “Finding our time”: Predicting students’ time management in online collaborative groupwork. Computers & Education, 69, 139-147.
39.
XuJ.YuanR.XuB.XuM. (2014). Modeling students’ time management in math homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 33-42.
40.
ZimmermanB. J.KitsantasA. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397-417.
