New editions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence and Memory scales are now available. Yet, given the significant changes in these new releases and the skepticism that has met them, independent evidence on their psychometric properties is much needed but currently lacking. We administered the WAIS-IV and the Older Adult version of the WMS-IV to 145 older adults. We examined how closely our data matched the normative sample by comparing our scaled scores with those of the publisher and by evaluating interrelations among subtests using confirmatory factor analysis. Not surprisingly, scaled scores from our sample were somewhat higher than those from the normative sample on some tests. Factor analysis on our sample provided support for a higher-order model of the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV Older Adults battery combined. In addition, allowing some subtests to load on more than one factor significantly improved model fit. The best fitting model for our sample was also the best for the normative sample. Overall, the data suggest that the factor analysis models generated from the normative samples for the new WAIS-IV and WMS-IV are reliable.
BarrettP. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjusting model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824.
2.
BensonN.HulacD. M.KranzlerJ. H. (2010). Independent examination of the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth edition (WAIS-IV): What does the WAIS-IV measure?Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 121-130.
3.
BentlerP. M. (1983). Some contributions to efficient statistics for structural models: Specification and estimation of moment structures. Psychometrika, 48, 493-571.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5.
BentlerP. M.WuE. J. C. (1995). Eqs for windows user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
6.
BowdenS. C.CarstairsJ. R.ShoresE. A. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of combined Wechsler adult intelligence scale—revised and Wechsler memory scale—revised scores in a healthy community sample. Psychological Assessment, 11, 339-344.
7.
BowdenS. C.RitterA. J.CarstairsJ. R.ShoresE. A.PeadJ.GreeleyJ. D.CliffordC.C. (2001). Factorial invariance for combined WAIS-R and WMS-R scores in a sample of patients with alcohol dependency. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 69-80.
8.
BowdenS. C.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2011). Augmenting the core battery with supplementary subtests: Wechsler adult intelligence scale-iv measurement invariance across the united states and canada. Assessment, 18(2), 133-140.
9.
BowdenS. C.WeissL. G.HoldnackJ. A.LloydD. (2006). Age-related invariance of abilities measured with the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-iii. Psychological Assessment, 18, 334-339.
10.
BrooksB. L.HoldnackJ. A.IversonG. L. (2011). Advanced clinical interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: Prevalence of low scores varies by level of intelligence and years of education. Assessment, 18, 156-167.
11.
BurtonD. B.RyanJ. J.AxelrodB. N.SchellenbergerT.RichardsH. M. (2003). A confirmatory factor analysis of the wms-iii in a clinical sample with cross-validation in the standardized sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 629-641.
12.
ButlerM.RetzlaffP.VanderploegR. (1991). Neuropsychological test usage. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice, 22, 510-512.
13.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Perspectives on the present and the future. International Journal of Testing, 1, 327-334.
14.
CanivezG. L.WatkinsM. W. (2010). Investigation of the factor structure of the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth edition (WAIS-IV): Exploratory and higher order factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 22, 827-836.
15.
CoalsonD.RaifordS. E.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. (2010). Advances in the assessment of intelligence. In WeissL.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 3-24). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
DrozdickL. W.CullumC. M. (2011). Expanding the ecological validity of WAIS-IV and WMS-IV with the texas functional living scale. Assessment, 18(2), 141-155.
18.
DrozdickL. W.WahlstromD.ZhuJ.WeissL. G. (2012). The Wechsler adult intelligence scale—fourth edition and the Wechsler memory scale—fourth edition. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (3rd ed., pp 197-223). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
GliskyE. L.RubinS. R.DavidsonP. S. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem?Journal of experimental psychology, Learning, memory, and cognition, 27, 1131-1146.
20.
HartmanD. E. (2009). Test review Wechsler adult intelligence scale iv (WAIS IV): Return of the gold standard. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 85-87.
21.
HoelzleJ. B.NelsonN. W.SmithC. A. (2011). Comparison of Wechsler memory scale-fourth edition (wms-iv) and third edition (wms-iii) dimensional structures: Improved ability to evaluate auditory and visual constructs. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 283-291.
22.
HoldnackJ. A.XiaobinZ.LarrabeeG. J.MillisS. R.SalthouseT. A. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis of the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV. Assessment, 18, 178-191.
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
24.
KaufmanA. S. (2010). Foreword. In WeissL.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. xiii-xxi). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
LoringD. W.BauerR. M. (2010). Testing the limits: Cautions and concerns regarding the new Wechsler iq and memory scales.Neurology, 74, 685-690.
26.
McGrewK. S. (2009). Chc theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1-10.
27.
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of applied psychology, 93, 568-592.
28.
MillisS. R.MalinaA. C.BowersD. A.RickerJ. H. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of the wms-iii. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 87-93.
29.
PriceL.TulskyD.MillisS.WeissL. (2002). Redefining the factor structure of the Wechsler memory scale-iii: Confirmatory factor analysis with cross-validation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 574-585.
30.
RabinL. A.BarrW. B.BurtonL. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the united states and canada: A survey of ins, nan, and apa division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 20(1), 33-65.
31.
RafteryA. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163-180). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
32.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2003). Reynolds intellectual assessment scales and the reynolds intellectual screening test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
33.
SalthouseT. A. (2010). Does the meaning of neurocognitive change change with age?Neuropsychology, 24, 273-278.
34.
SalthouseT. A.SaklofskeD. H. (2010). Do the WAIS-IV tests measure the same aspects of cognitive functioning in adults under and over 65? In WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 217-235). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
35.
SchwartzG. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
36.
SoubeletA.SalthouseT. A. (2011). Personality-cognition relations across adulthood. Developmental psychology, 47, 303-310.
37.
StanosJ. F. (2004). Test review: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48, 56-57.
38.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification—An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
39.
SullivanK.BowdenS. C. (1997). Which tests do neuropsychologists use?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 657-661.
40.
TabachnickB. G.FidelL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
41.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
42.
Tucker-DrobE. M. (2011). Global and domain-specific changes in cognition throughout adulthood. Developmental psychology, 47, 331-343.
43.
TulskyD. S.PriceL. R. (2003). The joint WAIS-III and WMS-III factor structure: Development and cross-validation of a six-factor model of cognitive functioning. Psychological Assessment, 15(2), 149-162.
44.
WardL. C.BergmanM. A.HebertK. R. (2012). WAIS-IV subtest covariance structure: Conceptual and statistical considerations. Psychological Assessment, 24, 328-340.
