The fifth edition of the Stanford-Binet test went through significant reformulation of its item content, administration format, standardization procedures, and theoretical structure. Additionally, the test was revised to measure five factors important to intelligence across both verbal and nonverbal domains. To better understand these substantial revisions, the underlying factor structure of the instrument was investigated using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis procedures across five age groups tested by the publishers. Analyses were conducted using 4,800 cases included in the instrument standardization. Results suggested that the verbal/nonverbal domains were identifiable with subjects younger than 10 years of age whereas a single factor was readily identified with older age groups.
Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 10-22.
2.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-600.
3.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
4.
Breckler, S. J. (1990). Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern?Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260-273.
5.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Byrne, B. A. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cattell, R. B., & Horn, J. L. (1978). A check on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest designs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 139-164.
9.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11.
Dombrowski, S. C., DiStefano, C., & Noonan, K. (2004). Review of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales: Fifth Edition (SB5). Communique, 33(1), 32-34.
12.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
13.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
14.
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
17.
Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1993). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 158-176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
19.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
20.
Kamphaus, R. W. (2001). Clinical assessment of child & adolescent intelligence (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
Keith, T. Z., Cool, V. A., Novak, C. G., White, L. J., & Pottebaum, S. M. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition: Testing the theory-test match. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 253-274.
22.
Kline, R. B. (1989). Is the fourth edition Stanford-Binet a four-factor test? Confirmatory analysis of alternative models for ages 2 through 23. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 7, 4-13.
23.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
24.
Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
26.
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
27.
Reynolds, C. R., Kamphaus, R. W., & Rosenthal, B. (1988). Factor analysis of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition for ages 2 through 23. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 52-63.
28.
Roid, G. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fifth Edition. Chicago: Riverside.
29.
Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629-1646.
30.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
SPSS. (2003). SPSS: Version 12.0 for Windows. Chicago: Author.
32.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Thorndike, R. M. (1990). Would the real factors of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition please come forward?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 412-435.
34.
U. S. Census Bureau (1998). Household and family characteristics: Population update. Retrieved October 2, 2005, from: http://www.census.gov/prod/3/98pubs/p20-515u.pdf.
35.
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components form the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 321-327.
36.
Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: A festschrift to Douglas Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
37.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
38.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 253-269.
