Maze and reading comprehension rate measures are calculated by using measures of reading speed and measures of accuracy (i.e., correctly selected words or answers). In sixth- and seventh-grade samples, we found that the measures of reading speed embedded within our Maze measures accounted for 50% and 39% of broad reading score (BRS) variance, respectively. Combining reading speed with Maze accuracy to form Maze rate increased explained BRS variance by <2%. For our comprehension measures, reading speed accounted for 22% and 36% of BRS variance, which increased significantly to 49% and 44% when our reading comprehension rate measures were added to our models. Discussion focuses on the relationships between the measure of aloud reading speed embedded within many brief reading rate measures and the validity and sensitivity of these measures.
AIMSweb Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention System. (2006). Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/
2.
BellS. M.McCallumR. S. (2008). Handbook of reading assessment. New York, NY: Pearson.
3.
ChallJ. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based problem modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
5.
FreelandJ. T.SkinnerC. H.JacksonB.McDanielC. E.SmithS. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 415-429.
6.
FrimanP. C.PolingA. (1995). Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applie research on response effort. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 583-590.
7.
FryE. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
8.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
9.
HaleA. D.HenningJ. B.HawkinsR. O.ShelleyW.ShoemakerL.ReynoldsJ. R.MochC. (2011). Reading assessment methods for middle-school students: An investigation of reading comprehension rate and Maze accurate response rate. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 28-36.
10.
HaleA. D.SkinnerC. H.WinnB. D.OliverR.AllinJ. D.MolloyC. C. M. (2005). An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 39-52.
11.
HintzeJ. M.ShapiroE. S. (1997). Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula?Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351-357.
12.
JenkinsJ. R.JewellM. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
13.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1985). Kaufman Test of educational achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251.
McDanielC. E.WatsonT. S.FreelandJ. T.SmithS. L.JacksonB.SkinnerC. H. (2001, May). Comparing silent repeated reading and teacher previewing using silent reading comprehension rate. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Applied Behavior Analysis, New Orleans, LA.
17.
McGrewK. S.WoodcockR. W. (2001). Technical manual: Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Miura-WaymanM.WallaceT.Ives-WileyH.TicháR.EspinC. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85-120.
20.
NeddenriepC. E.HaleA. D.SkinnerC. H.HawkinsR. O.WinnB. (2007). A preliminary investigation of the concurrent validity of reading comprehension rate: A direct, dynamic measure of reading comprehension. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 373-388.
21.
ParkerR.HasbrouckJ. E.TindalG. (1992). The Maze as a classroom-based reading measure: Construction methods, reliability, and validity. Journal of Special Education, 26, 195-218.
22.
PoncyB. C.SkinnerC. H.AxtellP. K. (2005). An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per min using curriculum based measurement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 226-238.
23.
PrescottG. A.BalowI.HoganT. P.FarrR. C. (1984). Metropolitan Achievement Test (MAT-6). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
24.
ReschlyA. L.BuschT. W.BettsJ.DenoS. L.LongJ. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading fluency as an indicator or reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427-469.
25.
RidgeA. D.SkinnerC. H. (2011). Using the TELLS pre-reading procedure to enhance comprehension levels and rates in secondary students. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 46-58.
26.
SamuelsS. J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency?Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563-566.
27.
ShapiroE. S. (2011). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
SkinnerC. H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In WatsonT. S.GreshamF. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 61-82). New York, NY: Plenum.
29.
SkinnerC. H.NeddenriepC. E.Bradley-KlugK. L.ZiemannJ. M. (2002). Advances in curriculum-based measurement: Alternative rate measures for assessing reading skills in pre- and advanced readers. Behavior Analyst Today, 3, 270-281.
30.
SkinnerC. H.RobinsonD. H.AdamsonK. L.AtchisonL. A.WoodwardJ. R. (1998). The effects of different listening-while-reading rates on comprehension in secondary students with reading deficits. Special Services in the Schools, 13, 115-128.
31.
SkinnerC. H.SkinnerC. H.BurtonB. (2009). Applying group-oriented contingencies in classrooms. In Akin-LittleK. A.LittleS. G.BrayM.KehleT. (Eds.), Behavioral interventions in schools: Evidence-based positive strategies (pp. 157-170). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
SkinnerC. H.WilliamsJ. L.MorrowJ. A.HaleA. D.NeddenriepC.HawkinsR. O. (2009). The validity of a reading comprehension rate: Reading speed, comprehension, and comprehension rates. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 1036-1047.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
35.
TicháR.EspinC. E.WaymanM. M. (2009). Reading progress monitoring for secondary school students: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to growth of reading-aloud and maze-selection measures. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24, 132-142.
WilliamsJ. L.SkinnerC. H.FloydR. G.HaleA. D.NeddenriepC.KirkE. (2011). Words correct per min: The variance in standardized reading scores accounted for by reading speed. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 87-101.
