The goal of improving reading rate and fluency is to positively impact reading comprehension; however, it is unclear how fast students with learning disabilities (LD) need to read to reap this benefit. The purpose of this research was to identify the point of diminishing return for students who were dysfluent readers. Participants included 337 students with reading difficulties in second and fourth grade (61% eligible for special education; 80% with a diagnosis of LD in the area of reading) and 150 typical readers from the same general education classes. LOESS (LOcal regrESSion) plots (logistic regression) were used to determine where linear relations between reading rate and comprehension broke down for these students: the rate at which getting faster no longer contributed clearly to reading comprehension improvement. Although typical readers in this sample showed patterns of oral reading rate and comprehension similar to students in other studies, patterns for students with reading difficulties differed. For dysfluent readers, improving reading rate improved comprehension only in the bands between 35 and 75 words correct per minute in second grade and between 40 and 90 words correct in fourth grade. Reading at faster rates revealed no clear advantage for reading comprehension.
AdamsM. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AllingtonR. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers? Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
3.
ChardD. J.VaughnS.TylerB. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
4.
ClaessensA.EngelM.CurranF. C. (2013). Academic content, student learning, and the persistence of preschool effects. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 403–434.
5.
ClevelandW. S. (1981). LOWESS: A program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. The American Statistician, 35, 54.
6.
ClevelandW. S.DevlinS. J. (1988). Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 596–610.
7.
CuttingL. E.ScarboroughH. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
EhriL. C. (1995). Stages of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.
10.
ElwerA.KeenanJ. M.OlsonR. K.ByrneB.SamuelssonS. (2013). Longitudinal stability and predictors of poor oral comprehenders and poor decoders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 497–516.
11.
FerrerE.ShaywitzB. A.HolahanJ. M.MarchioneK.ShaywitzS. E. (2010). Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: Empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 21, 93–101.
12.
FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.CattsH. W.TomblinJ. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In ParisS. G.StahlS. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369–394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
14.
GarciaJ. R.CainK. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111.
15.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available at http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
16.
GoodR. H.SimmonsD. C.Kame’enuiE. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 257–288.
17.
GraesserA. C.SingerM.TrabassoT. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371.
18.
HasbrouckJ.TindalG. A. (2006). ORF norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644.
19.
JenkinsJ. R.FuchsL. S.van den BroekP.EspinC.DenoS. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.
20.
JohnstonT. C.KirbyJ. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339–361. doi: 10.1007/s11145-005-4644-2
21.
KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S.OlsonR. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.
22.
KeenanJ. M.MeenanC. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 125–135.
23.
KimY. G. (2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 459–481.
24.
KimY. G.WagnerR. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 224–242.
25.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163.
26.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.LevyB. A.RasinskiT. V. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230–251.
27.
LaBergeD.SamuelsJ. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
28.
LesauxN.KiefferM. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 596–632.
29.
LyytinenH.ErskineJ.TolvanenA.TorppaM.PoikkeusA.LyytinenP. (2006). Trajectories of reading development: A follow-up from birth to school age of children with and without risk for dyslexia. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 514–547.
30.
MarkellM. A.DenoS. L. (1997). Effects of increasing oral reading: Generalization across reading tasks. Journal of Special Education, 31, 233–250.
31.
NagyW.TownsendD. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91–108.
32.
National Reading Panel Reports of the Subgroups. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
33.
NeseJ. F. T.BiancarosaG.CummingsK.KennedyP.AlonzoJ.TindalG. (2013). In search of average growth: Describing within-year oral reading fluency growth across grades 1-8. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 625–642.
34.
O’BrienB.WallotS.HaussmannA.KloosH. (2014). Using complexity metrics to assess silent reading fluency: A cross-sectional study comparing oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 235–254.
35.
O’ConnorR. E.GutierrezG.Knight-TeagueK.CheccaC. J.SunJ.HoT. (2013). Variations in practice time reading aloud: 10 versus 20 minutes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 134–162.
36.
O’ConnorR. E.JenkinsJ. R. (1999). The prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197.
37.
O’ConnorR. E.SwansonH. L.GeraghtyC. (2010). Improvement in reading rate under independent and difficult text levels: Influences on word and comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 1–19.
38.
O’ConnorR. E.WhiteA.SwansonH. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74, 31–46.
39.
ParisS. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202.
40.
PerfettiC.StafuraJ. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37.
41.
PetscherY.KimY. (2011). The utility and accuracy of oral reading fluency score types in predicting reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 107–129.
42.
RasinskiT. (2012). Why reading fluency should be hot. The Reading Teacher, 65, 516–522.
43.
ReschlyA. L.BuschT. W.BettsJ.DenoS. L.LongJ. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427–469.
44.
RoehrigA. D.PetscherY.NettlesS. M.HudsonR. F.TorgesenJ. K. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 343–366.
45.
SabatiniJ.O’ReillyT.HaldermanL. K.BruceK. (2014). Integrating scenario-based and component reading skill measures to understand the reading behavior of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 36–43.
46.
SamuelsS. J.EdigerK.Fautsch-PatridgeR. (2005). The importance of fluent reading. The New England Reading Association Journal, 41(1), 1–8.
47.
SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.WisenbakerJ. M.KuhnM. R.StraussG. P.MorrisR. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 496–522.
48.
ShankweilerD.CrainS.KatzL.FowlerA. E.LibermanA. M.BradyS. A.et al (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.
49.
ShanyM. T.BiemillerA. (1995). Assisted reading practice: Effects on performance for poor readers in Grades 3 and 4. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 382–395.
50.
ShaywitzB. A.HolfordT. R.HolahanJ. M.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K.FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E. (1995). A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading: Results from a longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 894–906.
51.
ShinnM. M.ShinnM. R. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
52.
SilberglittB.BurnsM. K.MadyunN. H.LailK. E. (2006). Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores: A longitudinal comparison of grade levels. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 527–535.
53.
SilberglittB.HintzeJ. M. (2007). How much growth can we expect? A conditional analysis of R-CBM growth rates by level of performance. Exceptional Children, 74, 71–84.
54.
SwansonH. L.O’ConnorR. E. (2009). The role of working memory and fluency training on reading comprehension in children who are dysfluent readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 548–575.
55.
SwansonH. L.SiegelL. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education: Contributions of Educational Psychology, 7, 1–48.
56.
TherrienW. J.WickstromK.JonesK. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 89–97.
57.
ThurlowR.van den BroekP. (1997). Automaticity and inference generation during reading comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 165–181.
58.
TindalG.NeseJ. F. T.StevensJ. J.AlonzoJ. (2016). Growth on oral reading fluency measures as a function of special education and measurement sufficiency. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 28–40. doi: 10.1177/0741932515590234
59.
TorgesenJ. K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In McArdleP.ChhabraV. (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355–382). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
60.
TorgesenJ. K.AlexanderA. W.WagnerR. K. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.
61.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2008). Repeated reading intervention: Outcomes and interactions with readers’ skills and classroom instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 272–290.
62.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2009). Supplemental fluency intervention and determinants of reading uutcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(5), 383–425.
63.
WalczykJ. J.WeiM.Griffeth-RossD. A.GoubertS. E.CooperA. L.ZhaP. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 867–887.
64.
WanzekJ.Al OtaibaS.PetscherY. (2014). Oral reading fluency development for children with emotional disturbance or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80, 187–204.
