This study examines the reliability and validity of a Chinese-translated version of the Gifted Rating Scales—Preschool/Kindergarten Form (GRS-P) and explores the effect of gender and age on each of the subscales. Data were collected from 250 kindergarten children, with age ranging from 4 years, 0 months to 6 years, 11 months. Results indicated that the reliability for the subscales of GRS-P was high. There were also significant correlations between GRS-P subscale scores and children’s school performance in language, number concept, and music. Results from the confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the five-factor model of the original GRS-P. No significant difference was identified across all age groups and in gender. The study, however, provided some initial findings for the use of GRS-P as a screening tool for identifying gifted young children in a Chinese population. Suggestions for further research on exploring the use of GRS-P for preschoolers are discussed.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
Bracken, B.A., Keith, L.K., & Walker, K.C. ( 1998). Assessment of preschool behavior and social-emotional functioning: A review of thirteen third-party instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16, 153-169.
3.
Callahan, C.M. ( 1996). A critical self-study of gifted education: Healthy practice, necessary evil or sedition? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 148-163.
4.
Chan, D.W. ( 2003). Adjustment problems and multiple intelligences among gifted students in Hong Kong: The development of the revised Student Adjustment Problems Inventory. High Ability Studies, 14, 41-54.
5.
Chan, D.W. ( 2004). Multiple intelligences of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: Perspectives from students, parents, teachers and peers. Roeper Review, 27, 18-24.
6.
Chan, D.W. ( 2008). Giftedness of Chinese students in Hong Kong: Perspectives from different conceptions of intelligences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 40-54.
7.
Feldhusen, J. ( 2003). The nature of giftedness and talent and the pursuit of creative achievement and expertise. Gifted and Talented, 7, 3-5.
8.
Gardner, H. ( 1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Geisinger, K.F. ( 1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments . Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
10.
Harrison, C. ( 1999). Visual representation of the young gifted child. Roeper Review, 21, 188-194.
11.
Harrison, C. ( 2004). Giftedness in early childhood: The search for complexity and connection. Roeper Review, 26, 78-84.
12.
Henson, R.K. ( 2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
13.
Hodge, K.A., & Kemp, C.R. ( 2000). Exploring the nature of giftedness in preschool children . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 46-73.
14.
Hong Kong Education Commission. (1990). Education commission report no. 4. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
15.
Hong Kong Education Department. (2000). Gifted education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Special Educational Needs Section, Curriculum Development Institute, Hong Kong.
16.
Hotulainen, R.H., & Schofield, N.J. (2003). Identified preschool potential giftedness in preschool children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 46-73.
17.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T.D. ( 2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
20.
Lee, D., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (2006). The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the Gifted Ratings Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 210-224.
21.
Li, H., Lee, D., Pfeiffer, S.I., & Petscher, Y. ( 2008). Parent ratings using the Chinese version of the Parent Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: Reliability and validity for Chinese students . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 659-675.
22.
Li, H., Pfeiffer, S.I., Petscher, Y., Kumtepe, A.T., & Mo, G. ( 2008). Validation of the Gifted Rating Scales- School Form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 160-169.
23.
Margulies, A.S., & Floyd, R.G. ( 2004). Test review of the Gifted Rating Scales (GRS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 275-282.
24.
Pfeiffer, S.I. ( 2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology , 1, 30-50.
25.
Pfeiffer, S.I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt.
26.
Pfeiffer, S.I., & Petscher, Y. ( 2008). Identifying young gifted children using the Gifted Rating Scales- Preschool/Kindergarten Form. Gifted Child Quarterly , 52, 19-29.
27.
Robinson, N. ( 1993). Parenting the very young gifted child. Storrs, CT: National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented.
28.
Ross, P.O. ( 1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
29.
Sankar-DeLeeuw, N. ( 2002). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission and programming. Roeper Review, 24, 172-177.
30.
Shi, J., & Zha, Z. ( 2000). Psychological research on and education of gifted and talented children in China. In K. A. Heller , F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 757-764). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
31.
Smutny, J.F. ( 1999). A special focus of young gifted children. Roeper Review, 21, 172-173.
32.
Sparrow, S.S., Pfeiffer, S.I., & Newman, T.M. ( 2005). Assessment of children who are gifted with the WISC-IV . In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation (pp. 282-298). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
33.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. ( 2007). Using multivariate analysis (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
Ward, S.A. ( 2005). Gifted Rating Scales. In R. A. Spiers & B. S. Plake (Eds.), 16th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 404-407). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
36.
Zigler, A., & Heller, K.A. ( 2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective . In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg , & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3-21). Amsterdam: Elsevier .
