Residential Recycling Programs: Environmental,Economic and Disposal Factors

Abstract

The type of recycling program initiated by state or local government is related to (a) the environmental awareness of the population and the subsequent reflection of that awareness in government, (b) the state's municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal situation, and (c) the market conditions for recycled materials. Two hypotheses are studied: (1) voluntary participation recycling programs are initiated when environmental awareness is the driving force and market conditions are good and (2) mandatory participation recycling programs result when the driving force is MSW disposal difficulties.

New Jersey and Oregon, two of the states, with statewide mandatory and voluntary recycling programs respectively, are studied with respect to the events leading to the enactment of their recycling programs. The hypotheses are supported by the events in each state. Hypothesis 2 is further supported by data from 48 states comparing information on each state's MSW disposal situation with the local and statewide recycling programs reported in a survey. The percentages of mandatory recycling programs increase with increasing MSW disposal difficulty. A measure of environmental awareness must be developed before hypothesis one can be studied with cross-sectional data.

Keywords

environmental awareness municipal solid waste recycled material markets residential recycling programs landfills U.S.A.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (1987) Disposal crisis coming? State-by-state answers. Waste Age. 18(1), 57-64.

Carney, L.H. (1983) The new environmentalists. The New York Times, February 20.

Case, C.P. (1985) Increasing demand for recycled materials. Biocycle, 26(8), 32-33.

Darcey, Susan (1987) Recycling resurges as viable option to disposal . World Waste, 30(7), 28-32, 72.

Darcey, S. (1988) Recycling interest surges as regs and markets form . World Waste, 31(2), 28-33.

Dodds, G.B. (1977) Oregon. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Nashville, TN.

Free (1987) Fund for renewable energy and the environment. The State of the States. The Fund for Renewable Energy and the Environment, Washington, D.C.

Glenn, J. (1987a) Recycling grows up. Biocycle, 28(8), 54-55.

Glenn, J. (1987b) Do people tell the truth about recycling? Biocycle, 28(9), 56-57.

10.

Glenn, J. (1987c) 7.5 million people, two landfills. Biocycle, 28(10), 36-38.

11.

Goldstein, N. (1984) New Jersey acts to avoid landfill crisis. Biocycle, 25(8), 20-24.

12.

Hertzberg, R. (1986) New directions in solid waste and recycling. Biocycle, 27(1), 22-27.

13.

Johnson, C.A. & Pettit, C.L. (1987) The 1986 tip fee survey: Documenting Rising Prices . Waste Age, 18(3), 61-64.

14.

Mattheis, A. (1987) New Jersey lays down the law. Waste Age, 18(6), 59-60.

15.

McClelland, J.M. (1983) Our pleasant condition, surrounded by fewer acres of clams. In Regionalism in the Pacific Northwest. ( Robbins, W. G. & Frank, R. J. , eds.). Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.

16.

Melosi, M.V. (1981) Garbage in the Cities: Refuse, Reform, and the Environment, 1880-1980. Texas A&M University Press , College Station, TX.

17.

Moakley, M. (1984) New Jersey. In The Political Life of the American States. ( Rosenthal, A. & Moakley, M. , eds.). Praeger Scientific, New York.

18.

Parker, L. (1985) Oregons pioneering recycling act. Environmental Law, 15, 387-411.

19.

Prindville, S.M. (1987) To end the crisis, earn public trust. Waste Age, Supplement, 5-6.

20.

Rosenthal, A. (1984) On analysing states. In The Political Life of the American States. ( Rosenthal, A. & Moakley, M. , eds.). Praeger Scientific, New York.