Seven methods were compared to evaluate methane flux densities m an actual municipal solid waste landfill: two accumulation chambers, two micrometeorological techniques (eddy correlation and mass balance methods), two tracer gas methods and an airborne infrared thermography. The comparison took into account scientific, technical and economic aspects.
Bogner, J. & Spokas, K. (1993) Landfill CH4: rates, fates and role in global carbon cycle. Chemosphere26, 369-386.
2.
Fontenelle, J.P., Chang, J.P., Allemand, N. , Bouchereau, J.M., Levy, C. & Riviere, E. (1997) Inventaire des emissions de gaz à effets de serre en France au cours de la période 1990-95 (Inventory of serious gas effects in France between 1990 and 1995 ) Etude CITEPA, 10 rue du Faubourg Poissonniere - 75010 Pans, France
3.
Savanne, D., Cassini, P. , Pokryszka, Z. , Tauziède, C., Trégourès, A. , Berne, P., Sabroux, J.C. , Cellier, P. & Laville, P. (1995) A comparison of methods for the measurement of methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills Fifth International Landfill Symposium, S Margeherita di Pula, Cagliari, Sardinia , Italy
4.
Trégourès, A. , Gonze, M. & Berne, P. (1997) Measurement of methane emissions using tracer-gas method improvement. Sixth International Landfill Symposium, S. Margeherita di Pula, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
