Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Upcycling fibre-reinforced plastic debris from abandoned fishing boats in the marine environment into innovative cementitious composite: A dual approach to natural resource conservation and consumer acceptance
Fibre-reinforced plastics (FRP) are widely used in the construction of commercial fishing boats, particularly in Asian countries, due to their durability and high strength. However, the lack of proper end-of-life disposal methods has led to the widespread abandonment of derelict boats, causing environmental harm through microplastic leaching and degrading coastal ecosystems. The study aimed to address this issue by evaluating a novel approach to convert derelict FRP fishing boats into cementitious composites, thereby reducing the consumption of natural sand and promoting long-term marine ecosystem sustainability. FRP debris were collected from fish landing centres along the Kerala coast. It was mechanically processed – shredded, pulverized, and sieved – to achieve a particle size of 0.3–1 mm. The resulting powder was used as a partial sand replacement (50%) in fabricating FRP-reinforced cementitious composites. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis confirmed the presence of glass fibre-reinforced polyester, with bulk density values lower than that of sand. Composition showed the powder primarily comprised glass fibre, making it a viable sand alternative. The resulting composite demonstrated mechanical properties comparable to traditional cementitious composites but with reduced specific weight, making it suitable for lightweight construction applications. Prototypes of architectural and beautification elements – such as vases, planter pots, and wall panels – were successfully developed using this composite. This study validated the feasibility of transforming environmentally problematic FRP debris derived from fishing boats into durable, value-added products. It highlights a sustainable solution that supports circular economy principles through effective debris valorisation and the conservation of finite natural resources.
Ainie Mat DomAJamaluddinNAzlina Abdul HamidN, et al. (2022) A review: GGBS as a cement replacement in concrete. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science1022: 012044.
2.
AkandaMdSIslamMdSAkbarMdA, et al. (2024) Thermal and morphological assessment of the penta-layered, hybrid U-polyester composite reinforced with glass fibers and polypropylene. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering2024: 1–11.
3.
AL-KharabshehBNMoafak ArbiliMMajdiA, et al. (2022) Feasibility study on concrete made with substitution of quarry dust: A review. Sustainability14: 15304.
4.
Al-TulaianBSAl-ShannagMJAl-HozaimyAR (2016) Recycled plastic waste fibers for reinforcing Portland cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials127: 102–110.
5.
AlsharariF (2025) Utilization of industrial, agricultural, and construction waste in cementitious composites: A comprehensive review of their impact on concrete properties and sustainable construction practices. Materials Today Sustainability29: 101080.
6.
AsokanPOsmaniMPriceADF (2009) Assessing the recycling potential of glass fibre reinforced plastic waste in concrete and cement composites. Journal of Cleaner Production17: 821–829.
7.
ASTM International (2018) Test Methods for Determining Loose and Tapped Bulk Densities of Powders using a Graduated Cylinder. ASTM International. Available at: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D7481-18 (accessed 14 June 2025).
8.
ASTM International (2020) Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM International. Available at: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C109C109M-20 (accessed 14 June 2025).
9.
ASTM International (2023a) Specification for Alkali Resistant (AR) Glass Fiber for GFRC and Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and Cement. ASTM International. Available at: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C1666C1666M-08R23 (accessed 28 December 2025).
ASTM International (2023d) Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete. ASTM International. Available at: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?C138C138M-17A (accessed 14 June 2025).
13.
BabafemiAJŠavijaBPaulSC, et al. (2018) Engineering properties of concrete with waste recycled plastic: A review. Sustainability10: 3875.
14.
BanerjeePHabibMSKuckianS, et al. (2023) Effects of glass fibre on the strength and properties of concrete. E3S Web of Conferences405: 03003.
Bureau of Indian Standards (1970) IS 383:1970: Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. New Delhi: BIS.
17.
Bureau of Indian Standards (2012) IS 1237:2012: Cement concrete flooring tiles – specification. New Delhi: BIS.
18.
Bureau of Indian Standards (2013) IS 269:2013: Ordinary Portland cement, 33 grade – specification. New Delhi: BIS.
19.
Bureau of Indian Standards (2015) IS 8042:2015: White Portland cement – specification. New Delhi: BIS.
20.
ByrnesTADunnRJK (2020) Boating- and shipping-related environmental impacts and example management measures: A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering8: 908.
ChenP-YFengRXuY, et al. (2023) Recycling and reutilization of waste carbon fiber reinforced plastics: Current status and prospects. Polymers15: 3508.
23.
ChenXChenHTanW (2022) Effect of glass powder on the mechanical and drying shrinkage of glass-fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. Case Studies in Construction Materials17: e01587.
24.
ChoiY-WMoonD-JChungJ-S, et al. (2005) Effects of waste PET bottles aggregate on the properties of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research35: 776–781.
25.
ChukwuMNMaduekeCIEkebafeLO (2019) Effects of snail shell as filler on the mechanical properties of terephthalic unsaturated polyester resin. Nigerian Research Journal of Chemical Sciences6: 21–32.
26.
CoackleyNBrynYConwyG (1991) Fishing boat construction, 2: Building a fiberglass fishing boat. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
27.
CoppolaLCadoniEForniD, et al. (2011) Mechanical characterization of cement composites reinforced with fiberglass, carbon nanotubes or glass reinforced plastic (GRP) at high strain rates. Applied Mechanics and Materials82: 190–195.
28.
CorreiaJRAlmeidaNMFigueiraJR (2011) Recycling of FRP composites: reusing fine GFRP waste in concrete mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production19: 1745–1753.
29.
DinițăARipeanuRGIlincăCN, et al. (2023) Advancements in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A comprehensive analysis. Polymers16: 2.
30.
FarinhaCBde BritoJVeigaR (2019) Assessment of glass fibre reinforced polymer waste reuse as filler in mortars. Journal of Cleaner Production210: 1579–1594.
31.
GalganiFShimWJBessaF, et al. (2025) A comprehensive analysis of the scrapping and abandonment of fiber-reinforced polymer vessels at sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin220: 118378.
32.
GandhimathiRSSivaMAravindSD, et al. (2025) Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete using agricultural waste. International Journal of Environmental Sciences11: 2542192.
33.
GavrileteaM (2017) Environmental impacts of sand exploitation. Analysis of sand market. Sustainability9: 1118.
34.
GeigerRHannanYTraviaW, et al. (2020) Composite wind turbine blade recycling – Value creation through Industry 4.0 to enable circularity in repurposing of composites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering942: 012016.
35.
GhazaliNMuthusamyKWan AhmadS (2019) Utilization of fly ash in construction. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering601: 012023.
36.
GopalNEdwinL (2013) Technology evaluation model for rural innovations – Case study of rubberwood fishing craft for the small-scale fisheries sector. Fishery Technology50: 331–340.
37.
GuoY-CLiX-MZhangJ, et al. (2023) A review on the influence of recycled plastic aggregate on the engineering properties of concrete. Journal of Building Engineering79: 107787.
38.
GuptaTChaudharySSharmaRK (2016) Mechanical and durability properties of waste rubber fiber concrete with and without silica fume. Journal of Cleaner Production112: 702–711.
39.
HabeebGAMahmudHB (2010) Study on properties of rice husk ash and its use as cement replacement material. Materials Research13: 185–190.
40.
HeXCaiYWangQ, et al. (2012) Improvement of mechanical properties and ultraviolet resistance of polyethylene pipe materials using high density polyethylene matrix grafted carbon black. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B: Physics51: 298–312.
41.
IbrahimKIM (2021) Recycled waste glass powder as a partial replacement of cement in concrete containing silica fume and fly ash. Case Studies in Construction Materials15: e00630.
42.
Jahanzaib KhalilMAslamMAhmadS (2021) Utilization of sugarcane bagasse ash as cement replacement for the production of sustainable concrete – A review. Construction and Building Materials270: 121371.
43.
JayaramSSivaprasadKNandakumarCG (2018) Recycling of frp boats. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology9: 244–252.
44.
Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP) (2021) Sea-Based Sources of Marine Litter. GESAMP No. 108, Study. London: IMO.
45.
KaboréMWEl BitouriYLhartiH, et al. (2024) Insights into the effect of recycled glass fiber reinforced polymer on the mechanical strengths of cement Mortar. Eng5: 2966–2977.
46.
KojimaAFurukawaS (1997) Recycling of resin matrix composite materials VII: Future perspective of FRP recycling. Advanced Composite Materials6: 215–225.
47.
KotoNSoegijonoB (2019) Effect of rice husk ash filler of resistance against of high-speed projectile impact on polyester-fiberglass double panel composites. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1191: 012058.
48.
KumarMHMacharyuluISRayT, et al. (2021) Effect of water absorption and curing period on strength and porosity of triple blended concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings43: 2162–2169.
49.
KumarSSDasDJhaPN, et al. (2024) Assessment of life cycle and environmental impact hotspots associated with the construction and disposal of fiberglass reinforced plastic fishing (FRP)Boats in the small-scale fishing sector of India: LCA of small-scale FRP fishing boats. Fishery Technology 61(4).
50.
LekshmiNMKumarSSAshrafPMNehalaSP, et al. (2023a) Occurrence and characteristics of fibreglass-reinforced plastics and microplastics on a beach impacted by abandoned fishing boats: A case study from Chellanam, India. Marine Pollution Bulletin192: 114980.
51.
LekshmiNMKumarSSAshrafPMXavierKAM, et al. (2023b) Abandonment of fibreglass reinforced plastic fishing boats in Kerala, India, and chemical emissions arising from their burning. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment195: 1413.
52.
LiY-FHsuY-WSyuJ-Y, et al. (2023) Study on the utilization of waste thermoset glass fiber-reinforced polymer in normal strength concrete and controlled low strength material. Materials16: 3552.
53.
MakulNFediukRAmranM, et al. (2021) Use of recycled concrete aggregates in production of green cement-based concrete composites: A review. Crystals11: 232.
54.
McVeaghJAnmakrudTGulbrandsonØ, et al. (2010) Training Manual on the Construction of FRP Beach Landing Boats. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
55.
MhatreAMChappaSOjhaS, et al. (2019) Functionalized glass fiber membrane for extraction of iodine species. Separation Science and Technology54: 1469–1477.
56.
MydinMAOAzmanNZNAwoyeraPO, et al. (2025) Bamboo stem ash as a sustainable cement replacement in lightweight foam mortar enhancing mechanical thermal and microstructural properties. Scientific Reports15: 34677.
57.
NanFShenQZouS, et al. (2025) Capillary water absorption characteristics of steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Buildings15: 1542.
58.
NeşerGAytekinV (2015) Modification of bitumen-based roof covering material by glass reinforced polyester recyclate. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management17: 583–589.
59.
OlsenKUlusHHeadMH, et al. (2025) Effect of particle size and replacement ratio on mechanical performance of cementitious mortar containing ground recycled acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (GRABS) waste plastics. Composites Part B: Engineering289: 111914.
60.
ÖnalMNeşerG (2018) End-of-life alternatives of glass reinforced polyester boat hulls compared by LCA. Advanced Composites Letters27: 096369351802700.
61.
PrasittisopinLFerdousWKamchoomV (2023) Microplastics in construction and built environment. Developments in the Built Environment15: 100188.
62.
PremurVAnić VučinićAMelnjakI, et al. (2019) Challenges andpossibilities for environmentally sound recycling of ships and composite boatsin European union. The Holistic Approach to Environment9: 35–43.
63.
QuZ (2020) Design and performance of water resistant cementitious materials: Mechanisms, evaluation and applications. PhD Thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven.
64.
RathoreNPanwarNL (2023) Environmental impact and waste recycling technologies for modern wind turbines: An overview. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy41: 744–759.
65.
RoshanMJGomes CorreiaA (2025) Multifunctional cementitious composites from fabrication to their application in pavement: A comprehensive review. Applied Sciences15: 3451.
66.
RubinoFNisticòATucciF, et al. (2020) Marine application of fiber reinforced composites: A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering8: 26.
67.
Sampath RaoPManzoor HussainMKishoreR (2012) Moisture absorption evolution of Gfrp laminates subjected to different environmental conditions. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering2: 33–38.
68.
SaraswatAKumar ParasharABahadurR (2023) Effect of coconut shell ash substitute with cement on the mechanical properties of cement concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings2023: 014.
69.
SinghVSinghRanaA (2025) Enhancing Sustainability in Concrete Construction: Utilizing LDPE and HDPE Plastics as Fine Aggregate Replacements. 5215483, SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
70.
SugaiMKoyamaM (2023) Effect of moisture on interfacial and mechanical properties of GFRP containing particles of two sizes. Results in Materials17: 100356.
71.
TaoYHadighehSAWeiY (2023) Recycling of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite wastes in concrete: A critical review and cost benefit analysis. Structures53: 1540–1556.
72.
ThomasBSGuptaRC (2016) A comprehensive review on the applications of waste tire rubber in cement concrete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews54: 1323–1333.
73.
TittarelliFMoriconiG (2010) Use of GRP industrial by-products in cement based composites. Cement and Concrete Composites32: 219–225.
74.
TittarelliFShahSP (2013) Effect of low dosages of waste GRP dust on fresh and hardened properties of mortars: Part 1. Construction and Building Materials47: 1532–1538.
75.
TorresASimoniMUKeidingJK, et al. (2021) Sustainability of the global sand system in the Anthropocene. One Earth4: 639–650.
76.
TurnerA (2022) Metal contamination of intertidal sediment and macroalgae in an area impacted by paint from abandoned boats. Marine Pollution Bulletin182: 113958.
77.
WangYLiLAnM, et al. (2022) Factors influencing the capillary water absorption characteristics of concrete and their relationship to pore structure. Applied Sciences12: 2211.
78.
WijerathneADHTRanjanMTTGalappaththiUIK (2022) Guidelines for manufacturing waterproof partition boards using the fibre reinforced plastics (FRP) waste from the boatbuilding sector. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation9: 128–134.
79.
WijewickramaLJeewanthaJPereraGIP, et al. (2025) Fiber-reinforced composites used in the manufacture of marine decks: A review. Polymers17: 2345.
80.
YazdanbakhshABankL (2014) A critical review of research on reuse of mechanically recycled FRP production and end-of-life waste for construction. Polymers6: 1810–1826.
81.
YoonKY (2009) Developing a general recycling method of FRP boats. Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environmental Engineering12: 29–34.
82.
YoonKYKimYSLeeSH (2008) Developing an extracting method of laminated glass-fiber from FRP boats. In: OCEANS 2008 – MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Ocean, Kobe, Japan, April 2008, pp.1–7. IEEE.
83.
ZhouBYZhangMMaGW (2021) Effect of all-component recycled GFRP on physical-mechanical properties and microstructures of concrete. Materials Science Forum1036: 402–418.
84.
ZhuJ-XWengK-FHuangB-T, et al. (2024a) Ultra-high-strength engineered cementitious composites (UHS-ECC) panel reinforced with FRP bar/grid: Development and flexural performance. Engineering Structures302: 117193.
85.
ZhuJ-XWengK-FLiuW-H, et al. (2024b) Thin-layer ultra-high-strength engineered cementitious composites (UHS-ECC) reinforced with small-diameter FRP bars for structural strengthening. Thin-Walled Structures205: 112592.
86.
ZhuangSWangQZhangM (2022) Water absorption behaviour of concrete: Novel experimental findings and model characterization. Journal of Building Engineering53: 104602.
