Pyrolysis is an attractive method to produce biochar from bio-renewable waste materials. In order to optimize the yield and control over the process, it is necessary to understand the interactions between the two compositions. This study investigated the primary reactions and synergistic effects of the pyrolysis process involving two food wastes: brewery spent grains (BSGs) and coffee ground waste (CGW). Pyrolysis of BSG, CGW and their mixtures has been examined utilizing thermogravimetric/differential thermogravimetric analysis. The characteristics of the generated biochar were assessed utilizing several analytical instruments. Although the mass yields of biochar were only slightly different when the feedstocks were blended, the N- and C-conversion efficiencies were higher for the blends than for either of the feedstocks alone. As a result, the biochars from the blends have a higher overall carbon content, fixed carbon content and lower oxygen content than those from the pure feedstock. Fourier transform infrared and pyrolysis gas chromatography/flame ionization detector results identified the main functional groups and determined the yield of the products from each blend. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectrometry was used to explore the surface morphology and composition of biochars produced by the co-pyrolysis process. The overall findings offered here are a basic investigation of the co-pyrolysis of food wastes and potential applications of the produced solid products for environmental and energy-conversion purposes.
AhmedAAbu BakarMSRazzaqA, et al. (2021) Characterization and thermal behavior study of biomass from invasive Acacia mangium species in Brunei preceding thermochemical conversion. Sustainability13: 5249.
2.
AkouesonFChbibCMonchyS, et al. (2021) Identification and quantification of plastic additives using pyrolysis-GC/MS: A review. Science of The Total Environment773: 145073.
3.
ApaydınVEMutluU (2023) TGA-FTIR analysis of biomass samples based on the thermal decomposition behavior of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Energies16: 3674.
4.
ArauzoPJDuLOlszewskiMP, et al. (2019) Effect of protein during hydrothermal carbonization of brewer’s spent grain. Bioresource Technology293: 122117.
5.
AtabaniAEAliIRaza NaqviS, et al. (2022) A state-of-the-art review on spent coffee ground (SCG) pyrolysis for future biorefinery. Chemosphere286: 131730.
6.
AwasthiMKSarTGowdSC, et al. (2023) A comprehensive review on thermochemical, and biochemical conversion methods of lignocellulosic biomass into valuable end product. Fuel342: 127790.
7.
BalogunAOSotoudehniakaraniSMcDonaldAG (2017) Thermo-kinetic, spectroscopic study of brewer’s spent grains and characterisation of their pyrolysis products. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis127: 8–16.
8.
BerheMHAsfawAAsfawN (2013) Investigation of waste coffee ground as a potential raw material for biodiesel production. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research3: 854–860.
9.
BragugliaCMGallipoliAGianicoA, et al. (2018) Anaerobic bioconversion of food waste into energy: A critical review. Bioresource Technology248: 37–56.
10.
CaiWLiuQShenD, et al. (2019) Py-GC/MS analysis on product distribution of two-staged biomass pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis138: 62–69.
11.
ChenW-HChuY-SLiuJ-L, et al. (2018) Thermal degradation of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids in microalgae analyzed by evolutionary computation. Energy Conversion and Management160: 209–219.
12.
ChenXWuRSunY, et al. (2021) Synergistic effects on the co-pyrolysis of agricultural wastes and sewage sludge at various ratios. ACS Omega7:1264–1272.
13.
ChenZHuMZhuX, et al. (2015) Characteristics and kinetic study on pyrolysis of five lignocellulosic biomass via thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology192: 441–450.
14.
ChewKRLeongHYKhooKS, et al. (2021) Effects of anaerobic digestion of food waste on biogas production and environmental impacts: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters19: 2921–2939.
15.
DamartzisThZabaniotouA (2021) Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews15: 366–378.
16.
DhyaniVBhaskarT (2018) A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renewable Energy129: 695–716.
17.
dos SantosMTRMoretzsohn de MelloPPCamporese SérvuloEF (2014) Solid wastes in brewing process: A review. Journal of Brewing and Distillingl5: 1–19.
18.
EllisonCGarcia-PerezMMullenCA, et al. (2023) Thermochemical behavior of alkali pretreated biomass – A thermogravimetric and Py-GC/FID study. Sustainable Energy & Fuels7: D3SE00213F.
19.
GarcíaRPizarroCLavínAG, et al. (2013) Biomass proximate analysis using thermogravimetry. Bioresource Technology139: 1–4.
20.
GirottoFAlibardiLCossuR (2015) Food waste generation and industrial uses: A review. Waste Management45: 32–41.
21.
HassanMLiuYNaiduR, et al. (2020) Influences of feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochar and functionality as adsorbents: A meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment744: 140714.
22.
HeMXiongXWangL, et al. (2021) A critical review on performance indicators for evaluating soil biota and soil health of biochar-amended soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials414: 125378.
23.
HuYXieKWangH, et al. (2021) Preparation and property of N-doped porous carbon material by one-step pyrolysis of protein-rich algal biomass. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis157: 105221.
24.
IkramSHuangLYZhangH, et al. (2017) Composition and nutrient value proposition of brewers spent grain. Journal of Food Science82: 2232–2242.
25.
JagdalePZieglerDRovereM, et al. (2019) Waste coffee ground biochar: A material for humidity sensors. Sensors19: 801.
26.
JanuRMrlikVRibitschD, et al. (2021) Biochar surface functional groups as affected by biomass feedstock, biochar composition and pyrolysis temperature. Carbon Resources Conversion4: 36–46.
27.
LazarPMachROtyepkaM (2019) Spectroscopic fingerprints of graphitic, pyrrolic, pyridinic, and chemisorbed nitrogen in N-doped graphene. Journal of Physical Chemistry C123: 10695–10702.
28.
LiuL-YXieG-JXingD-F, et al. (2020) Biological conversion of methane to polyhydroxyalkanoates: Current advances, challenges, and perspectives. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology2: 100029.
29.
LiuTLiYPengN, et al. (2017) Heteroatoms doped porous carbon derived from hydrothermally treated sewage sludge: Structural characterization and environmental application. Journal of Environmental Management197: 151–158.
30.
LeeY-GChoE-JMaskeyS, et al. (2023) Value-added products from coffee waste: A review. Molecules28: 3562.
31.
LengLYangLChenJ, et al. (2020) A review on pyrolysis of protein-rich biomass: Nitrogen transformation. Bioresource Technology315: 123801.
32.
MaJLuoHLiY, et al. (2019) Pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamic parameters of the hydrochars derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization of sawdust and sewage sludge using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology282: 133–141.
33.
MainaliKGarcia-PerezM (2023a) Understanding organic N interactions with cellulose during pyrolysis to produce N-doped carbonaceous materials. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis169: 105791.
34.
MainaliKGarcia-PerezM (2023b) Effect of H3PO4 and NaOH additives on the Co-carbonization of cellulose and N-containing compounds to produce N-doped chars. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis169: 105837.
35.
MainaliKMoodSHPelaez-SamaniegoMR, et al. (2023a) Production and applications of N-doped carbons from bioresources: A review. Catalysis Today423: 114248.
36.
MainaliKSarkerMIMullenCA, et al. (2023b) Statistical optimization to improve N and C efficiency in biochar from model systems. Bioresource Technology24: 101646.
37.
MainaliKSarkerMIMullenCA, et al. (2025) Thermal decomposition kinetics of dairy manure hydrochars. Journal of the Energy Institute120: 102088.
38.
ManikandanSVickramSSirohiR, et al. (2023) Critical review of biochemical pathways to transformation of waste and biomass into bioener. Bioresource Technology372: 128679.
39.
MingXXuFFJiangY, et al. (2020) Thermal degradation of food waste by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS: Pyrolysis behaviors, products, kinetic and thermodynamic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production244: 118713.
40.
MonishaRSRagupathyLMBaskaranS, et al. (2022) Green remediation of pharmaceutical wastes using biochar: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters20: 1–24.
41.
MoodSHAyianiaMJefferson-MilanY, et al. (2020) Nitrogen doped char from anaerobically digested fiber for phosphate removal in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere240: 124889.
42.
Morin-CriniNLichtfouseETorriG, et al. (2019) Applications of chitosan in food, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cosmetics, agriculture, textiles, pulp and paper, biotechnology, and environmental chemistry. Environmental Chemistry Letters17: 1667–1692.
43.
NaikSGoudVVRoutPK, et al. (2010) Characterization of Canadian biomass for alternative renewable biofuel. Renewable Energy35: 1624–1631.
44.
NandhiniRBerslinDSivaprakashB, et al. (2022) Thermochemical conversion of municipal solid waste into energy and hydrogen: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters20:1645–1669.
45.
NavalonSDhakshinamoorthyAAlvaroM, et al. (2017) Active sites on graphene-based materials as metal-free catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews46: 4501–4529.
46.
NewburyDERitchieNW (2013) Is scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) quantitative?Scanning35: 141–168.
47.
Olivares-GalvánSMarinaMLGarcíaMC (2022) Extraction of valuable compounds from brewing residues: Malt rootlets, spent hops, and spent yeast. Trends in Food Science & Technology127: 181–197.
48.
OngPJLeowYSooXYD, et al. (2023) Valorization of spent coffee grounds: A sustainable resource for Bio-based phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Waste Management157: 339–347.
49.
Ortiz-SanchezMInocencio-GarcíaP-JAlzate-RamírezAF, et al. (2023) Potential and restrictions of food-waste valorization through fermentation processes. Fermentation9: 274.
50.
PalansooriyaKNShaheenSMChenSS, et al. (2020) Soil amendments for immobilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: A critical review. Environment International34: 105046.
51.
PfliegerCEckhardTSchmitzG, et al. (2022) Thermicity of the decomposition of oxygen functional groups on cellulose-derived chars. ACS Omega7: 48606–48614.
52.
RoKSLibraJABaeS, et al. (2018) Combustion behavior of animal-manure-based hydrochar and pyrochar. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Journal7: 470–478.
53.
Rueda-OrdóñezYJTannousK (2015) Isoconversional kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of sugarcane straw for thermal conversion processes. Bioresource Technology196: 136–144.
54.
SchanesKDobernigKGözetB (2018) Food waste matters – A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Producation182: 978–991.
55.
ShengCAzevedoJLT (2005) Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenergy28: 499–507.
56.
SherFIqbalSZLiuH, et al. (2020) Thermal and kinetic analysis of diverse biomass fuels under different reaction environment: A way forward to renewable energy sources. Energy Conversion and Management203: 112266.
57.
TewsIGarciaAAyianiaM, et al. (2021) Nitrogen-doped char as a catalyst for wet oxidation of phenol-contaminated water. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery14: 1–15.
58.
ThomasKRRahmanP (2006) Brewery wastes. Strategies for sustainability. A review. Aspects of Applied Biology80: 1–11.
59.
TongcumpouCUsapeinPTuntiwiwattanapunN (2019) Complete utilization of wet spent coffee grounds waste as a novel feedstock for antioxidant, biodiesel, and bio-char production. Industrial Crops and Production138: 111484.
60.
TruongLMorashDLiuY, et al. (2019) Food waste in animal feed with a focus on use for broilers. International Journal of Recycling Waste in Agriculture8: 417–429.
61.
UsinoDOYlitervoPMorenoA, et al. (2021) Primary interactions of biomass components during fast pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis159: 105297.
62.
VilariñoM VFrancoCQuarringtonC (2017) Food loss and waste reduction as an integral part of a circular economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science5: 21.
63.
WangMTaftiNDWangJJ, et al. (2021) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on Si release of alkali-enhanced Si-rich biochar and plant response. Biochar3: 469–484.
64.
WangYXiaoXXuY, et al. (2019) Environmental effects of silicon within biochar (sichar) and carbon–silicon coupling mechanisms: A critical review. Environmental Science and Technology53: 13570–13582.
65.
XuSChenJPengH, et al. (2021) Effect of biomass type and pyrolysis temperature on nitrogen in biochar, and the comparison with hydrochar. Fuel291: 120128.
66.
YangYSunCHuangQ, et al. (2022) Hierarchical porous structure formation mechanism in food waste component derived N-doped biochar: Application in VOCs removal. Chemosphere291: 132702.
67.
Zeko-PivačATišmaMŽnidaršič-PlazlP, et al. (2022) The potential of brewer’s spent grain in the circular bioeconomy: State of the art and future perspectives. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology10: 870744.
68.
ZhaoNLiuZYuT, et al. (2024) Spent coffee grounds: Present and future of environmentally friendly applications on industries – A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology143: 104312.
69.
ZhaoX-YJiangWShanY-F, et al. (2021) Mechanism study on nitrogen migration and catalytic denitrification during the pyrolysis of lysine and tryptophan. Energy Fuel36: 502–513.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
