Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025-12
A review of circular economy barriers and a demand,supply,price and cost-based market modelling in semiconductor manufacturing facilities (fabs): Towards scalable reuse and recycling of unique fab construction materials
The global economy relies heavily on virgin materials, yet efforts to scale up reuse and recycle have yet to reach their full potential. Semiconductor manufacturing facilities (fabs), a rapidly expanding and highly resource-intensive sector, depend on high-quality virgin materials due to strict and diverse requirements. Despite this growth, little research has examined how circular economy (CE) strategies – particularly reuse and recycling – can be effectively applied across the fab lifecycle. Implementing these strategies requires both technical feasibility and economic viability, which are uniquely complex in fabs. This study addresses this gap by extending a market-based framework that models the demand, supply, price and cost (DSPC) dynamics between virgin and reused/recycled construction materials within fabs. Using a knowledge- and model-based approach, the study examines fab-specific requirements – such as intellectual property restrictions, customization, strict design codes and contamination risks. It then reviews technical, economic, regulatory and social barriers to reuse and recycling, translating these constraints into DSPC relationships. To test the framework, it is initially applied to non-fab materials such as steel and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Results show that technical limitations significantly shrink recycled HDPE’s market size, whereas recycled steel remains economically viable. This framework lays the foundation for future research aimed at adapting the approach to fab-specific materials. The broader implication is that understanding DSPC interactions enables fab stakeholders to evaluate when and how reuse and recycling can be realistically and economically adopted – ultimately reducing virgin resource use, minimizing waste and enabling scalable CE adoption in the sector.
AkinadeOOOyedeleLOAjayiSO, et al. (2017) Design for deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills. Waste Management60: 3–13.
2.
AkinadeOOOyedeleLOAjayiSO, et al. (2018) Designing out construction waste using BIM technology: Stakeholders’ expectations for industry deployment. Journal of Cleaner Production180: 375–385.
3.
AkinadeOOOyedeleLOBilalM, et al. (2015) Waste minimisation through deconstruction: A BIM based deconstructability assessment score (BIM-DAS). Resources, Conservation and Recycling105: 167–176.
AmickHBayatAKemenyZA (1998) Seismic isolation of semiconductor production facilities. Proc. Seminar on Seismic Design, Retrofit, and Performance of Nonstructural Components, Seminar ATC 29-1, Applied Technology Council, pp. 297–312.
7.
AnastasiadesKGoffinJRinkeM, et al. (2021) Standardisation: An essential enabler for the circular reuse of construction components? A trajectory for a cleaner European construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production298: 126864.
8.
AnghelVChetwyndDG (2001) Creating a low-cost, ultra-clean environment. Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology26: 122–127.
9.
ANSI/ESD (2021) For the development of an electrostatic discharge control program for protection of electrical and electronic parts, assemblies and equipment (excluding electrically initiated explosive devices), Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Association, Rome, NY.
10.
ANSI/SMACMA (2005) HVAC duct construction standards. Available at: www.smacna.org (accessed 01 May 2025).
11.
ANSI/SMACNA (2017) Thermoset FRP duct construction manual. Available at: https://www.ansi.org/ (accessed 26 April 2025).
12.
Antwi-AfariPNgSTChenJ, et al. (2023) Enhancing life cycle assessment for circular economy measurement of different case scenarios of modular steel slab. Building and Environment239: 110411.
13.
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (2025) 2025 Hazardous Waste Fees Update. Available at: https://www.azdeq.gov/hazwaste/fees (accessed 11 May 2025)
14.
AroraMRaspallFFearnleyL, et al. (2021) Urban mining in buildings for a circular economy: Planning, process and feasibility prospects. Resources Conservation and Recycling174: 105754.
15.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2017) ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE Library.
16.
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) (2022) Standard 90.1-2022 Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. ASHRAE.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2024) B31.3 Process piping. ASME.
19.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2015) ASTM F1545-15 Standard specification for plastic-lined ferrous metal pipe, fittings, and flanges. ASTM.
20.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2020a) ASTM E2924-14 Standard practice for Intumescent coatings. ASTM.
21.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2020b) ASTM F2619 Standard specification for high-density polyethylene (PE) line pipe. ASTM.
22.
BaoZLeeWMWLuW (2020) Implementing on-site construction waste recycling in Hong Kong: Barriers and facilitators. Science of the Total Environment747: 141091.
23.
BertinoGKisserJZeilingerJ, et al. (2021) Fundamentals of building deconstruction as a circular economy strategy for the reuse of construction materials. Applied Sciences (Switzerland)11: 1–31.
24.
BhavsarVSridharanSRSudarsanJS (2023) Barriers to circular economy practices during construction and demolition waste management in an emerging economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances20: 200198.
25.
BroniewiczEBroniewiczMSkubiakB, et al. (2023) Adaptive reuse of buildings. Economics and Environment83: 338–357.
BuyleMGalleWDebackerW, et al. (2019) Sustainability assessment of circular building alternatives: Consequential LCA and LCC for internal wall assemblies as a case study in a Belgian context. Journal of Cleaner Production218: 141–156.
28.
CalderaSRyleyTZatykoN (2020) Enablers and barriers for creating a marketplace for construction and demolition waste: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland)12: 1–19.
ChauhanKPeltokorpiALavikkaR, et al. (2022) To prefabricate or not? A method for evaluating the impact of prefabrication in building construction. Construction Innovation24: 65–82.
32.
ChenP-HNguyenTC (2019) A BIM-WMS integrated decision support tool for supply chain management in construction . Automation in Construction98: 289–301.
33.
ChenW-LChenH-JChenS-L (2006) Feedback simulation of duct design for alkali exhaust system in a semiconductor factory. Energy and Buildings38: 1069–1075.
34.
ChenYTWangYPLeeCL, et al. (2022) Seismic vibration control of suspended ceilings in electronics factories. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings177: 3–20.
35.
ChoNEl AsmarMAldaajaM (2022) An analysis of the impact of the circular economy application on construction and demolition waste in the United States of America. Sustainability (Switzerland)14: 10034.
36.
ChongWKHermreckC (2011) Modeling the use of transportation energy for recycling construction steel. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy13: 317–330.
CochranKTownsendTReinhartD, et al. (2007) Estimation of regional building-related C&D debris generation and composition: Case study for Florida, US. Waste Management27: 921–931.
39.
CochranKMTownsendTG (2010) Estimating construction and demolition debris generation using a materials flow analysis approach. Waste Management30: 2247–2254.
40.
Cruz RiosFBerryBIsenhourC, et al. (2021) Why Bother? Environmental and social implications of using durable building products. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10344/10204 (accessed 7 August 2024).
41.
Cruz RiosFGrauD (2020a) Design for disassembly: An analysis of the practice (or lack thereof) in the United States. In: GrauDTangPEl AsmarM (eds) Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts–Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2020 (pp. 992–1000). American Society Of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Tempe, United States.
42.
Cruz RiosFGrauD (2020b) Circular economy in the built environment: designing, deconstructing, and leasing reusable products. In: HashmiSChoudhuryIA (eds) Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials, vol. 1–5. Elsevier, pp. 338–343.
43.
Cruz RiosFGrauDChongWK (2019) Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment. Waste Management94: 120–135.
44.
Cruz RiosFPanicSGrauD, et al. (2022) Exploring circular economies in the built environment from a complex systems perspective: A systematic review and conceptual model at the city scale. Sustainable Cities and Society80: 103411.
45.
DengYGanVJLDasM, et al. (2019) Integrating 4D BIM and GIS for construction supply chain management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management145: 1633.
46.
DingZWangXZouPXW (2023) Barriers and countermeasures of construction and demolition waste recycling enterprises under circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production420: 138235.
47.
DuLFengYLuW, et al. (2020) Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholders’ decision-making behaviours in construction and demolition waste management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review84: 106408.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2024) Sustainable materials management. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/smm (accessed 1 March 2024).
53.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2025) 40 CFR Part 355 The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities. Code of Federal Regulations (Annual Edition). Available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-J/part-355 (accessed 3 May 2025).
ErayESanchezBHaasCT (2019) Usage of interface management system in adaptive reuse of buildings. Buildings9: 105.
57.
FM Approvals (2020) FM 4910 Examination standard for cleanroom materials. FM Approvals
58.
FM Approvals (2021) FM 4882 Examination standard for class 1 interior wall and ceiling materials or systems for smoke sensitive occupancies. FM Approvals
GaniyuSAOyedeleLOAkinadeO, et al. (2020) BIM competencies for delivering waste-efficient building projects in a circular economy. Developments in the Built Environment4: 100036.
61.
GhiselliniPRipaMUlgiatiS (2018) Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production178: 618–643.
62.
GlobalFoundries (2025) GlobalFoundries fabs expansion. https://gf.com/ (accessed 3 May 2025).
63.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2020) Recycling: Building on existing federal efforts could help address cross-cutting challenges (Issue December). Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-87.pdf (accessed 10 March 2024)
64.
GrahamTGrahamBGahanD, et al. (2007) The application of knowledge management practices in the procurement and construction of cleanroom projects. In: BoydD (ed.) Proceedings 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 3–5 September 2007. Belfast, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 545–546.
65.
Greenpeace (2022) Circular claims fall flat again. A 2022 report by Greenpeace on comprehensive U.S. survey of plastics recyclability.
66.
GuFWangJGuoJ, et al. (2020) Dynamic linkages between international oil price, plastic stock index and recycle plastic markets in China. International Review of Economics and Finance68: 167–179.
67.
GuerraBCLeiteF (2021) Circular economy in the construction industry: An overview of United States stakeholders’ awareness, major challenges, and enablers. Resources, Conservation and Recycling170: 105617.
68.
GuerraBCLeiteFFaustKM (2020) 4D-BIM to enhance construction waste reuse and recycle planning: Case studies on concrete and drywall waste streams. Waste Management116: 79–90.
69.
GuyBCiarimboliN (2007) Design for disassembly in the built environment. Pennsylvania State University.
70.
GuyerJP (2017) An introduction to recycling construction and demolition waste. Independently Published.
71.
HaqueSENaharNHaqueMS (2024) A study on the waste generation rates and recycling potential for the construction and demolition waste in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment196: 183.
72.
HasanFHossenMRShahbazAA (2021) How the steel industry has been affected by the trade war between the USA and China. International Journal of Critical Accounting12: 348–368.
73.
HermreckCChongWK (2009) Embodied energy of cdw recycling and technical metabolism due to regional differences and building designs. 2009 Construction Research Congress, American Society of Civil Engineers.
74.
HossainMUWuZPoonCS (2017) Comparative environmental evaluation of construction waste management through different waste sorting systems in Hong Kong. Waste Management69: 325–335.
75.
HsiehCCLiuCYWuPY, et al. (2019) Building information modeling services reuse for facility management for semiconductor fabrication plants. Automation in Construction102: 270–287.
76.
HyvärinenMRonkanenMKärkiT (2020) Sorting efficiency in mechanical sorting of construction and demolition waste. Waste Management and Research38: 812–816.
77.
IacovidouEPurnellP (2016) Mining the physical infrastructure: Opportunities, barriers and interventions in promoting structural components reuse. Science of the Total Environment 557–558: 791–807.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (2022) Factory integration. In: ITRS: The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. IEEE. Available at : https://irds.ieee.org/editions/2022/executive-summary (accessed 1 May 2025).
80.
Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (IEST) (2016) IEST-RP-CC001.6 HEPA and ULPA Filters. IEST. Available at: preview_IEST-RP-CC001_6.pdf (accessed 1 May 2025).
International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (2014) Passive and active structural vibration control in civil engineering. London: Springer.
85.
International Organization of Standardization (ISO) (2004) ISO 14644-5:2004 Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments-Part 5: Operations. ISO. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/33445.html (accessed 3 May 2025).
IvannikovALKongar-SyuryunCRybakJ, et al. (2019) The reuse of mining and construction waste for backfill as one of the sustainable activities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science362: 12130.
88.
JeonMKhambampatiAKSongJH, et al. (2024) Industrial monitoring of residue deposition in semiconductor process exhaust pipelines using electrical capacitance measurements. IEEE Access13: 1445–1457.
89.
Joseph UdiUYussofMMMusa AyagiK, et al. (2023) Environmental degradation of structural glass systems: A review of experimental research and main influencing parameters. Ain Shams Engineering Journal14: 101970.
90.
KabirifarKMojtahediMWangC, et al. (2020) Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production263: 121265.
91.
KazemianNPakpourSMilaniAS, et al. (2019) Environmental factors influencing fungal growth on gypsum boards and their structural biodeterioration: A university campus case study. PLoS One14: e0220556.
KhanSARSheikhAAHassanNM, et al. (2024a) Modeling the intricate association between sustainable service quality and supply chain performance: moderating role of blockchain technology and environmental uncertainty. Sustainability (Switzerland)16: 4808.
94.
KhanSARSheikhAAShamsiIR Al, et al. (2025) The Implications of artificial intelligence for small and medium-sized enterprises’ sustainable development in the areas of blockchain technology, supply chain resilience, and closed-loop supply chains. Sustainability (Switzerland)17: 010334.
95.
KhanSARTahirMSSheikhAA (2024b) Sustainable performance in SMEs using big data analytics for closed-loop supply chains and reverse omnichannel. Heliyon10: e36237.
96.
KhanSIRayBRKarmakarNC (2024c) RFID localization in construction with IoT and security integration. Automation in Construction159: 105249.
97.
KimEALeeHERyuHW, et al. (2011) Cases series of malignant lymphohematopoietic disorder in Korean semiconductor industry. Safety and Health at Work2: 122–134.
98.
KimJYuGJangYJ (2016) Semiconductor FAB layout design analysis with 300-mm FAB data: “Is minimum distance-based layout design best for semiconductor FAB design?”Computers and Industrial Engineering99: 330–346.
99.
KimJHSongWSJiaoQ, et al. (2023) Stress-corrosion cracking of polypropylene in harsh oxidizing environments. Extreme Mechanics Letters64. DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2023.102080.
KrausmannFWiedenhoferDLaukC, et al. (2017) Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114: 1880–1885.
102.
LanfangLIssamSChongWK, et al. (2015) Integrating G2G, C2C and resource flow analysis into life cycle assessment framework: A case of construction steel’s resource loop. Resources, Conservation and Recycling102: 143–152.
103.
LeeSChungSKwonS, et al. (2021) Assessment of BIM competencies and correlation analysis between competencies and career characteristics of fab construction project participants. Applied Sciences (Switzerland)11: 8468.
104.
LeygrafCChangTHertingG, et al. (2019) The origin and evolution of copper patina colour. Corrosion Science157: 337–346.
LiuCHuaCChenJ (2022a) Efficient supervision strategy for illegal dumping of construction and demolition waste: A networked game theory decision-making model. Waste Management and Research40: 754–764.
107.
LiuJGongEWangX (2022b) Economic benefits of construction waste recycling enterprises under tax incentive policies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research29: 12574–12588.
108.
LlatasCQuiñonesRBizcochoN (2022) Environmental impact assessment of construction waste recycling versus disposal scenarios using an LCA-BIM Tool during the design stage. Recycling7: 0082.
109.
MaCDuZWangX, et al. (2024) Corrosion of stainless steels and corrosion protection strategies in the semiconductor manufacturing industry: a review. Corrosion Reviews42: 127–161.
110.
MaMTamVWLeKN, et al. (2022) Factors affecting the price of recycled concrete: A critical review. Journal of Building Engineering46: 103743.
MooreJFolkinshteynDHowellJP (2022) The potential for exchange-traded futures on recycled materials to improve recycling efficiency. Investment Management and Financial Innovations19: 93–104.
MwanzaBG (2021) Introduction to recycling. In: ParameswaranpillaiJMavinkere RangappaSGulihonnehalli RajkumarA, et al. (eds) Recent developments in plastic recycling. Springer Singapore, pp. 1–13.
118.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2018a) NFPA 703 standard for fire retardant – treated wood and fire–retardant coatings for building materials. NFPA
119.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2018b) NFPA 5000 Building construction and safety code. NFPA
120.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2020) NFPA 91 Standard for exhaust systems for air conveying of vapors, gases, mists, and particulate solids. NFPA
121.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) (2025) NFP8 318 Standard for the protection of semiconductor fabrication facilities. NFPA.
NežerkaVZbíralTTrejbalJ (2024) Machine-learning-assisted classification of construction and demolition waste fragments using computer vision: Convolution versus extraction of selected features. Expert Systems with Applications238: 121568.
124.
NiHPChongWOChouJS (2024) Optimizing HVAC systems for semiconductor fabrication: A data-intensive framework for energy efficiency and sustainability. Journal of Building Engineering89: 109397.
125.
OlafasakinOMaJBradshawSL, et al. (2023) Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of standalone single-stream material recovery facilities in the United States. Waste Management166: 368–376.
126.
Oliveira NetoRGastineauPCazacliuBG, et al. (2017) An economic analysis of the processing technologies in CDW recycling platforms. Waste Management60: 277–289.
127.
OluleyeBIChanDWMOlawumiTO (2022) Barriers to circular economy adoption and concomitant implementation strategies in building construction and demolition waste management: A PRISMA and interpretive structural modeling approach. Habitat International126: 102615.
128.
ParkSHShinJAParkHH, et al. (2011) Exposure to volatile organic compounds and possibility of exposure to by-product volatile organic compounds in photolithography processes in semiconductor manufacturing factories. Safety and Health at Work2: 210–217.
129.
PeytonT. H.AbdouO. A. (1995). Industrial Cleanrooms: Architectural Engineering Considerations. The American Society of Civil Engineers1(1): 37–52.
PrestesSMDManciniSDRodolfoA, et al. (2012) Construction and demolition waste as a source of PVC for recycling. Waste Management and Research30: 115–121.
134.
RogersZSGolaraSAbdulsalamY, et al. (2024) Protect me not: The effect of tariffs on U.S. supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management30: 100897.
SelmiRHammoudehSKasmaouiK, et al. (2022) The dual shocks of the COVID-19 and the oil price collapse: A spark or a setback for the circular economy?Energy Economics109: 105913.
141.
SEMI (2018) SEMI S6 Environmental, health, and safety guideline for exhaust ventilation of semiconductor manufacturing equipment. SEMI
142.
SEMI (2023) SEMI S23 Guide for conservation of energy, utilities and materials used by semiconductor manufacturing equipment. SEMI
143.
SEMI (2024) SEMI S2 Environmental, health & safety guideline for semiconductor manufacturing equipment. SEMI
144.
SEMI Standards. (2022) SEMI F57 Specification for polymer materials and components used in ultrapure water and liquid chemical distribution systems. SEMI
145.
SenaratneSSaysanavongphethESamaratungaM (2025) Exploring challenges and strategies in circular economy applications in modular construction: The case in Australia. Buildings15: 1515.
146.
ShaulyEN (2022) Stress-related layout design rules and modeling. In: ShaulyEN (ed.) Design Rules in a Semiconductor Foundry, 1st edn., pp. 405–448. Singapore: Jenny Stanford Publishing.
147.
ShenCWTranPPLyPTM (2018) Chemical waste management in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Sustainability (Switzerland)10(5). DOI: 10.3390/su10051545.
SrourIChongWKZhangF (2012) Sustainable recycling approach: An understanding of designers’ and contractors’ recycling responsibilities throughout the life cycle of buildings in two US cities. Sustainable Development20: 350–360.
SuYXuYBaoZ, et al. (2024) Stakeholder interactions of government intervention in construction and demolition waste recycling market: A game theory approach. Developments in the Built Environment18: 100391.
153.
TamVWYTamCMZengS, et al. (2007) Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building and Environment42: 3642–3654.
154.
TasselPKovácsBGebserM, et al. (2023) Semiconductor fab scheduling with self-supervised and reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings – Winter Simulation Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, pp. 1924–1935.
TownsendTGIngwersenWWNiblickB, et al. (2019) CDDPath: A method for quantifying the loss and recovery of construction and demolition debris in the United States. Waste Management84: 302–309.
157.
TrivediA (2021) Want a New Factory to Make Car Chips? That’ll Be $4 Billion, Please. Bloomberg. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/y78gjqrd (accessed 27 April 2025).
TusharQBhuiyanMAZhangG, et al. (2021) An integrated approach of BIM-enabled LCA and energy simulation: The optimized solution towards sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production289: 125622.
160.
UlubeyliSKazazAArslanV (2017) Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: Management issues. Procedia Engineering172: 1190–1197.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2024) Global status report for buildings and construction: beyond foundations: Mainstreaming sustainable solutions to cut emissions from the buildings sector. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/45095 (accessed 11 June 2024).
Van LaarBGrecoARemøyH, et al. (2024) What matters when? – An integrative literature review on decision criteria in different stages of the adaptive reuse process. Developments in the Built Environment18: 100439.
165.
VillardALelahABrissaudD (2015) Drawing a chip environmental profile: Environmental indicators for the semiconductor industry. Journal of Cleaner Production86: 98–109.
166.
WangFPermanaIGuanDLH, et al. (2023) Performance approaches for improving airflow parallelism in a semiconductor cleanroom. ASHRAE Transactions128: 13–15.
167.
WarrenJDChongWKKimC (2007) Recycling construction and demolition waste for construction in Kansas City metropolitan area, Kansas and Missouri. Transportation Research Record2011: 193–200.
168.
WhiteEK (2009) Cleanroom Design, Construction, and Qualification. Journal of Validation Technology 200915: 30–39.
XuT (2007) Characterization of minienvironments in a clean room: Design characteristics and environmental performance. Building and Environment42: 2993–3000.
171.
YehCFHsiaoCWLinSJ, et al. (2004) The removal of airborne molecular contamination in cleanroom using PTFE and chemical filters. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing17: 214–220.
172.
YoonCKimSParkD, et al. (2020) Chemical use and associated health concerns in the semiconductor manufacturing industry. Safety and Health at Work11: 500–508.
173.
YostPAHalsteadJM (1996) A methodology for quantifying the volume of construction waste. Waste Management and Research14: 453–461.
174.
ZhaoYLiNTaoC, et al. (2021) A comparative study on energy performance assessment for HVAC systems in high-tech fabs. Journal of Building Engineering39: 102188.
