Waste sorting and recycling (WSAR) is a crucial issue for sustainable waste management. Growing up with new values, the younger generation has the responsibility to lead the society towards a sustainable future. The successful implementation of WSAR requires an in-depth understanding of the attitudes and obstacles of the youth participation. This study seeks to explore and compare the influencing factors of youth engagement in WSAR in Shenzhen, China and Turku, Finland by drawing on the theory of planned behaviour. Quantitative data was collected from 170 youth citizens in Shenzhen and 179 in Turku. Structural equation modelling results suggest that there is a clear consistency between the youth’s intention and behaviour in both cities. Two reverse pyramids were constructed to prioritize the influencing factors based on their importance in the structural models. Subjective norms, knowledge and perceived behavioural control are key influencing factors in Shenzhen group while in Turku’ s setting, compatibility acts as a top determinant whereas, subjective norms have the least influencing power. Results from Turku also reveal that lower compatibility does not necessarily hinder youth participation in WSAR practice. Several suggestions and implications on boosting youth participation in WSAR are drawn, based on these findings.
AboelmagedM (2021) E-waste recycling behaviour: An integration of recycling habits into the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production278: 124182.
2.
AbrahamseWStegLVlekC, et al. (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology25: 273–291.
3.
AhmadMSBazmiAABhuttoAW, et al. (2016) Students’ responses to improve environmental sustainability through recycling: Quantitatively improving qualitative model. Applied Research in Quality of Life11: 253–270.
4.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179–211.
5.
Alliance for Smart Sanitation (2018) International: Status quo of household waste management in Finland: The recycling rate is about 44%, and all waste is collected and transported by classification. Available at: http://huanbao.bjx.com.cn/news/20180312/884893-2.shtml (accessed 12 March 2018).
6.
AlSuwaidiMEidRAgagG (2021) Understanding the link between CSR and employee green behaviour. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management46: 50–61.
7.
ArıEYılmazV (2016) A proposed structural model for housewives’ recycling behavior: A case study from Turkey. Ecological Economics129: 132–142.
8.
BabaeiAAAlaviNGoudarziG, et al. (2015) Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling102: 94–100.
9.
BarrS (2007) Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior39: 435–473.
10.
BotetzagiasIDimaAFMalesiosC (2015) Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling95: 58–67.
11.
ByrneBMShavelsonRJMuthénB (1989) Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin105: 456–466.
12.
ChanLBishopB (2013) A moral basis for recycling: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology36: 96–102.
13.
ChenMFTungPJ (2010) The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behavior42: 824–844.
14.
ChuPYChiuJF (2003) Factors influencing household waste recycling behaviour: Test of an integrated model 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology33: 604–626.
15.
De YoungR (1986) Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation-satisfactions. Environment and Behavior18: 435–449.
16.
DixitSBadgaiyanAJ (2016) Towards improved understanding of reverse logistics – Examining mediating role of return intention. Resources, Conservation and Recycling107: 115–128.
17.
DonaldIJCooperSRConchieSM (2014) An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters’ transport mode use. Journal of Environmental Psychology40: 39–48.
18.
DoneyPMCannonJPMullenMR (1998) Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review23: 601–620.
19.
EchegarayFHanssteinFV (2016) Assessing the intention-behaviour gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production142: 180–190.
20.
EchegarayFHanssteinFV (2017) Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production142: 180–190.
21.
ErtzMKarakasFSarigöllüE (2016) Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research69: 3971–3980.
22.
FanBYangWShenX (2019) A comparison study of ‘motivation–intention–behavior’ model on household solid waste sorting in China and Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production211: 442–454.
23.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1977) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp.1–56.
24.
FornellCBooksteinFL (1982) Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research19: 440–452.
25.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research34: 161–188.
26.
GefenDStraubDBoudreauMC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems4: 7.
27.
Gonul KochanCPourrezaSTranH, et al. (2016) Determinants and logistics of e-waste recycling. The International Journal of Logistics Management27: 52–70.
28.
Graham-RoweEJessopDCSparksP (2015) Predicting household food waste reduction using an extended theory of planned behaviour. Resources, Conservation and Recycling101: 194–202.
29.
GuidottiTLAbercrombieS (2008) Aurum: A case study in the politics of NIMBY. Waste Management & Research26: 582–588.
30.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
31.
HairJJFHultGTMRingleC, et al. (2016) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
HeidariAKolahiMBehraveshN, et al. (2018) Youth and sustainable waste management: a SEM approach and extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management20: 2041–2053.
33.
HuangSCLoSLLinYC (2013) Application of a fuzzy cognitive map based on a structural equation model for the identification of limitations to the development of wind power. Energy Policy63: 851–861.
34.
IoannouTZampetakisLALasaridiK (2013) Psychological determinants of household recycling intention in the context of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin22: 2035–2041.
35.
JainSSinghalSJainNK, et al. (2020) Construction and demolition waste recycling: Investigating the role of theory of planned behavior, institutional pressures and environmental consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production263: Article 121405.
36.
JenaSKSarmahSP (2015) Measurement of consumers’ return intention index towards returning the used products. Journal of Cleaner Production108: 818–829.
37.
Karim GhaniWAWARusliIFBiakDRA, et al. (2013) An application of the theory of planned behaviour to study the influencing factors of participation in source separation of food waste. Waste Management33: 1276–1281.
38.
KautonenTvan GelderenMFinkM (2015) Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39: 655–674.
39.
KhanFAhmedWNajmiA (2019a) Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: Perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling142: 49–58.
40.
KhanFAhmedWNajmiA, et al. (2019b) Managing plastic waste disposal by assessing consumers’ recycling behavior: The case of a densely populated developing country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research26: 33054–33066.
41.
KipperbergGLarsonDM (2012) Heterogeneous preferences for community recycling programs. Environmental and Resource Economics53: 577–604.
42.
KlineRB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications.
43.
KumarA (2019) Exploring young adults’ e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: A cross-cultural study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling141: 378–389.
44.
LaiYZhangX (2016) Redevelopment of industrial sites in the Chinese ‘villages in the city’: An empirical study of Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production134: 70–77.
45.
LamSP (1999) Predicting intentions to conserve water from the theory of planned behavior, perceived moral obligation, and perceived water right. Journal of Applied Social Psychology29: 1058–1071.
46.
LauraBBarbaraFFedericaM, et al. (2020) Factors affecting household food waste among young consumers and actions to prevent it: A comparison among UK, Spain and Italy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling153: Article 104586.
47.
LeHLYamasueEOkumuraH, et al. (2013) Analysis of intentions to recycle electronic waste (E-waste) using the theory of planned behaviour: A case study in urban areas of Vietnam. In: YaoT (ed.) Zero-Carbon Energy Kyoto 2012: Green Energy and Technology. Epub ahead of print 20 November 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-020-10136-z.
48.
LehmanPKGellerES (2004) Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues13: 13–33.
49.
LiaoCZhaoDZhangS (2018) Psychological and conditional factors influencing Staff’s takeaway waste separation intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Cities and Society41: 186–194.
50.
LizinSVan DaelMVan PasselS (2017) Battery pack recycling: Behaviour change interventions derived from an integrative theory of planned behaviour study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling122: 66–82.
51.
LoannouTZampetakisLALasaridiK (2013) Psychological determinants of household recycling intention in the context of the theory of planned behaviour. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin22: 2035–2041.
52.
LuanHLiTLLeeMH (2020) High school students’ environmental education in Taiwan: Scientific epistemic views, decision-making style, and recycling intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1–20.
53.
MaJHipelKWHansonML, et al. (2018) An analysis of influencing factors on municipal solid waste source-separated collection behavior in Guilin, China by using the theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Cities and Society37: 336–343.
54.
MakTMWYuIKMTsangDCW, et al. (2018) Promoting food waste recycling in the commercial and industrial sector by extending the theory of planned behaviour: A Hong Kong case study. Journal of Cleaner Production204: 1034–1043.
55.
MakTMWYuIKMWangL, et al. (2019) Extended theory of planned behaviour for promoting construction waste recycling in Hong Kong. Waste Management83: 161–170.
56.
MengXWenZQianY (2018) Multi-agent based simulation for household solid waste recycling behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling128: 535–545.
57.
MiafodzyevaSBrandtN (2013) Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Vaporization4: 221–235.
58.
Ministry of the Environment (2009) Towards a recycling society – The National Waste Plan for 2016. Avaiable at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/38022 (accessed April 2019).
59.
OskampSHarringtonMJEdwardsTC, et al. (1991) Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior23: 494–519.
60.
OuelletteJAWoodW (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin124: 54.
61.
PakpourAHZeidiIMEmamjomehMM, et al. (2014) Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Waste Management34: 980–986.
62.
PapaoikonomouKLatinopoulosDEmmanouilC, et al. (2020) A survey on factors influencing recycling behavior for waste of electrical and electronic equipment in the municipality of Volos, Greece. Environmental Processes7: 321–339.
63.
曲英 (2007) 城市居民生活垃圾源头分类行为研究.博士论文.大连理工大学工商管理学院,辽宁,大连 (Qu Y (2007)Research on the classification behaviours of urban residents’ domestic waste. Doctoral Dissertation, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning).
64.
RazaliFDaudDWeng-WaiC, et al. (2020) Waste separation at source behaviour among Malaysian households: The theory of planned behaviour with moral norm. Journal of Cleaner Production271: 122025.
65.
RhodesREBeauchampMRConnerM, et al. (2015) Prediction of depot-based specialty recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour. Environment and Behavior47: 1001.
66.
SaphoresJDMOgunseitanOAShapiroAA (2012) Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: An analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of U.S. Households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling60: 49–63.
Shenzhen Municipal Administration and Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau (2019) List of Shenzhen municipal solid waste incineration power plants in 2019. Available at: http://cgj.sz.gov.cn/zjcg/md/content/post_2029779.html (accessed 26 April 2019).
69.
Shenzhen Municipal Administration and Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau (2020) List of Shenzhen municipal solid waste incineration power plants in 2019. Available at: http://cgj.sz.gov.cn/xsmh/szhw/hwsj/content/post_6758687.html (accessed 21 February 2020)
SidiqueSFJoshiSVLupiF (2010) Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling54: 242–249.
74.
SinghMPChakrabortyARoyM (2018) Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to explore circular economy readiness in manufacturing MSMEs, India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling135: 313–322.
75.
SooraniFAhmadvandM (2019) Determinants of consumers’ food management behavior: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Waste Management98: 151–159.
76.
SteenkampJBaumgartnerH (1998) Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research25: 78–107.
77.
StrizhakovaYCoulterRAPriceLL (2008) The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment. International Journal of Market Research25: 82–93.
78.
SwaimJAMaloniMJNapshinSA, et al. (2014) Influences on student intention and behavior toward environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics124: 465–484.
79.
TarisTWKesslerSRKellowayEK (2021) Strategies addressing the limitations of cross-sectional designs in occupational health psychology: What they are good for (and what not). Work and Stress35: 1–5.
80.
TaylorSToddP (1995) An integrated model of waste management behaviour: A test of household recycling and composting intentions. Environment and Behavior27: 603–630.
81.
TuckerPGraysonJSpeirsD (2001) Integrated effects of a reduction in collection frequency for a kerbside newspaper recycling scheme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling31: 149–170.
82.
VandenbergRJLanceCE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods3: 4–70.
83.
WanCShenGQYuA (2014) The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling83: 141–151.
84.
王婷婷 (2015) 公众生活垃圾源头分类行为影响因素研究.博士论文.浙江理工大学,浙江 (Wang TT (2015)Research on influencing factors of source classification behaviour of public living waste. Doctoral Dissertation, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Zhejiang).
85.
WangYLongXLiL, et al. (2021) Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: The moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility. Environment Development and Sustainability23: 7230.
86.
WelfensMJNordmannJSeibtA (2016) Drivers and barriers to return and recycling of mobile phones. Case studies of communication and collection campaigns. Journal of Cleaner Production132: 108–121.
87.
World Environment (2019) Swedish household waste management experience and enlightenment. Available at: https://www.sohu.com/a/325436621_383718 (accessed 8 July 2019).
WuML (2010) Structural Equation Model-Use and Application of AMOS. Chongqing, China: Chongqing University Press.
90.
XiaoLZhangGZhuY, et al. (2017) Promoting public participation in household waste management: A survey based method and case study in Xiamen city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production144: 313–322.
91.
YadavRPathakGS (2017) Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics134: 114–122.
92.
YangY (2017) A comparative study between Chinese and Finns: Communication accommodation and values exchange in grandparent and grandchild communication, Master’s dissertation. University of Jyväskylä. Finland.
93.
YinJGaoYXuH (2014) Survey and analysis of consumers’ behaviour of waste mobile phone recycling in China. Journal of Cleaner Production65: 517–525.
94.
YushkovaEFengY (2017) What explains the intention to bring mobile phones for recycling? A study on university students in China and Germany. International Economics and Economic Policy14: 501–516.
95.
ZhangHDuanHAndricJM, et al. (2018) Characterization of household food waste and strategies for its reduction: A Shenzhen city case study. Waste Management78: 426–433.
96.
ZhangSZhangMYuX, et al. (2016) What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling109: 176–186.
ZhengJMaGWeiJ, et al. (2020) Evolutionary process of household waste separation behavior based on social networks. Resources, Conservation and Recycling161: 105009. Article 105009.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
