Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Commission (EC) (2017) Study for the strategy for a non-toxic environment of the 7th EAP. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/non-toxic/pdf/Sub-study%20b%20articles%20non-toxic%20material%20cycles%20NTE%20final.pdf (accessed 18 May 2020).

Millward-Hopkins

Busch

Purnell

, et al. (2018) Fully integrated modelling for sustainability assessment of resource recovery from waste. Science of the Total Environment 612: 613–624.

Skene

(2018) Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: Why the circular economy cannot work. Sustainability Science 13: 479–492.

Stanisavljevic

Brunner

(2019) Quantity AND quality: New priorities for waste management. Waste Management & Research 37: 665–666.

Swedish EPA (2010) Recycling of Waste for Construction Purposes [in Swedish: Återvinning av avfall i anläggningsarbeten]. Handbook 2001:1. CM-gruppen. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.

Velis

(2018) No circular economy if current systemic failures are not addressed. Waste Management & Research 36: 757–759.

Towards clean material cycles: Is there a policy conflict between circular economy and non-toxic environment?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References