In an increasingly complex waste market, market-based policy instruments, such as disposal taxes, can give incentives for sustainable progress while leaving flexibility for innovation. However, implementation of disposal taxes is often criticised by domestic waste handlers that fear to be outcompeted by competitors in other countries. The article discusses three innovative market-based instruments that limit the impact on international competitiveness: Tradable recycling credits, refunded disposal taxes and differentiated disposal taxes. All three instruments have already been implemented for distinct environmental policies in Europe. In order to illustrate how these instruments can be used for waste policy, the literature review is complemented with a case study on shredder residues from metal-containing waste streams in Belgium. The analysis shows that a conventional disposal tax remains the most efficient, simple and transparent instrument. However, if international competition is a significant issue or if political support is weak, refunded and differentiated disposal taxes can have an added value as second-best instruments. Tradable recycling credits are not an appropriate instrument for use in small waste markets with market power. In addition, refunded taxes create similar incentives, but induce lower transactions costs.
AtsmaJ (2012) Policy Intention to Withdraw Trade in Nitrogen Oxides [Beleidsvoornemen de handel in stikstofoxiden in te trekken]. Ministerie van infrastructuur en milieu.
2.
BIOIS (2012) Use of economic instruments and waste management performances. Report for the European Commission DG ENV. Paris: Bio Intelligence Service.
3.
BIOIS (2013) Study on Tradable Recycling Credits [Etude sur les certificats de recyclage négociables]. Study for ADEME.
4.
CDC (2012) The EU ETS carbon price: to intervene, or not to intervene. In: Climate Brief n°12, February, pg 1–8. CDC Climate Research.
5.
Directive for End-of-Life Vehicles (2000/53/EC) Directive 2000/53/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles.
6.
Directive for packaging and packaging waste (94/62/EC) European parliament and of council directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste
7.
Directive for Waste from Electric and Electronical Equipment (2012/19/EU) Directive 2012/19/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)
8.
DuboisM (2012) Extended producer responsibility for consumer waste: The gap between economic theory and implementation. Waste Management & Research30: 36–42.
9.
DuboisM (2013) Towards a coherent European approach for taxation of combustible waste. Waste Management33: 1776–1783.
10.
DuboisMEyckmansJ (2014) Efficient waste management policies and strategic behavior with open borders. Environmental and Resource Economics, in press. DOI 10.1007/s10640-014-9851-3.
11.
DuboisMVanderreydtI (2014) Flemish Disposal Taxes for Shredder Residue [Inzet van Vlaamse milieuheffingen voor verwerking van shredder residu]. Steunpunt Duurzaam Materialenbeheer.
12.
EEA (2011) Earnings, Jobs and Innovation: The Role of Recycling in a Green Economy. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
13.
EEA (2012) Movements of Waste Across the EU’s Internal and External Borders. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
14.
EllermanADConveryFDe PerthuisC (2009) Pricing Carbon – The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge University Press.
15.
EU (2010) Presidency’s Summary of the informal environment council on sustainable materials management. Council of the European Union.
16.
European Commission (2013) Strategic implementation plan for the european innovation partnership on raw materials. Working document, version 0.
17.
FischerC (2011) Market power and output-based refunding of environmental policy revenues. Resource and Energy Economics33: 212–230.
18.
FrederikssonPGSternerT (2005) The political economy of refunded emissions payment programs. Economic Letters87: 113–119.
19.
GersbachHRequateT (2004) Emission taxes and optimal refunding schemes. Journal of Public Economics88: 713–725.
20.
GHK (2006) A study to examine the benefits of the End of Life Vehicles directive and the costs and benefits of a revision of the 2015 targets for recycling, re-use and recovery under the ELV directive. Report for the European Commission DG ENV. London: GHK Holdings Limited.
21.
Höglund IsakssonL (2005) Abatement costs in response to the Swedish charge on nitrogen oxide emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management50: 102–120.
22.
JohnsonKC (2007) Refunded emission taxes: A resolution to the cap-versus-tax dilemma for greenhouse gas regulation. Energy Policy35: 3115–3118.
23.
KennedyPW (1994) Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management27: 49–63.
24.
MatsuedaNNagaseY (2012) An economic analysis of the packaging waste recovery system in the UK. Resource and Energy Economics34: 669–679.
25.
MDO (2012) Monitoring of Sustainable Management of Aggregates [Monitoringsysteem Duurzaam Oppervlaktedelfstoffenbeleid]. Report for LNE, OVAM and Vito.
26.
NEA (2011) Annual report 2010. Den Haag: De Nederlandse Emissieautoriteit.
27.
NentjensAWoerdmanE (2012) Tradable permits versus tradable credits: A survey and analysis. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics6: 1–78.
28.
OECD (2001) Extended producer responsibility, a guidance manual for governments.
29.
OECD (2012) Sustainable materials management: Making better use of resources.
30.
OECD (2014) Innovative economic instruments for sustainable materials management, working paper for the Working Party on Resource Productivity and Waste.
31.
PalmerKWallsM (1997) Optimal policies for solid waste disposal taxes, subsidies and standards. Journal of Public Economics65: 193–205.
32.
PorterR (2002) The Economics of Waste. Washington: Resources for the Future.
33.
SimicVDimitrijevicB (2012) Production planning for vehicle recycling factories in the EU legislative and global business environments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling60: 78–88.
34.
SovacoolBK (2011) The policy challenges of tradable credits: A critical review of eight markets. Energy Policy39: 575–585.
35.
SternerTTurnheimB (2009) Innovation and diffusion of environmental technology: Industrial NOx abatement in Sweden under refunded emission payments. Ecological Economics68: 2996–3006.
36.
TietenbergTLewisL (2010) Environmental Economics and Policy, 6th ed.Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
37.
UNEP (2012) Metal recycling: Opportunities, limits, infrastructure. United Nations Environment Programme.
38.
US Clean Air Act Amendments (1990) passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate, and signed by the President on November 15, 1990.
39.
VanderreydtIDuboisMEyckmansJ. (2013) The Role of Recycling Credits as an Innovating Instrument in Waste and Materials Management [Onderzoek naar recyclagecertificaten als vernieuwend economisch instrument voor het afval- en materialenbeheer]. Mechelen: OVAM.
40.
VermeulenIVan CaneghemJBlockC. (2011) Automotive shredder residue (ASR): Reviewing its production from end-of-life vehicles (ELV) and its recycling, energy or chemicals’ valorization. Journal of Hazardous Materials190: 8–27.
41.
Waste Shipment Regulation (1013/2006) Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste.
