The problem of the high carbon dioxide emissions linked to power generation makes necessary active research on the use of biofuels in gas turbine systems as a promising alternative to fossil fuels. Gasification of biomass waste is particularly of interest in obtaining a fuel to be run in gas turbines, as it is an efficient biomass-to-biofuel conversion process, and an integration into a combined cycle power plant leads to a high performance with regard to energetic efficiency. The goal of this study was to carry out an energetic, exergetic and environmental analysis of the behaviour of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant fuelled with different kinds of biomass waste by means of simulations. A preliminary economic study is also included. Although a technological development in gasification technology is necessary, the results of simulations indicate a high technical and environmental interest in the use of biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BioIGCC) systems for large-scale power generation from biomass waste.
AbadieLMChamorroJM (2008) European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments. Energy Economics30: 2992–3015.
2.
AnhedenM (2000) Analysis of gas turbine systems for sustainable energy conversion. PhD Thesis, KTH, Sweden.
3.
BaratieriMBaggioPBosioBGrigianteMLongoGA (2009) The use of biomass syngas in IC engines and CCGT plants: A comparative analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering29: 3309–3318.
4.
BolszoCDMcDonellVG (2009) Emissions optimization of a biodiesel fired gas turbine. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute32: 2949–2956.
5.
CampbellPEEvansRHMcMullanJTWilliamsBC (2001) The potential for adding plastic waste fuel at a coal gasification power plant. Waste Management & Research19: 526–532.
6.
ChacarteguiRSánchezDMuñoz de EscalonaJMMuñozASánchezT (2011) Redesigning gas and steam combined cycles for low BTU syngas fuels utilisation. In: proceeding of the 6th Dubrovnik conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 25–29 September 2011.
7.
Council of the European Union (eds) (2007) Presidency Conclusions 8/9 March 2007 (7224/1/07), 2007. Brussels: European Council Conclusions.
8.
EscuderoMJiménezÁGonzálezCNietoRLópezI (2012) Analysis of the behaviour of biofuel-fired gas turbine power plants. Thermal Science16: 849–864.
9.
European Parliament and Council (eds) (2001) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2001/80/EC) on the Limitation of Emissions of Certain Pollutants into the Air From Large Combustion Plants (2001). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
10.
European Parliament and Council (eds) (2003). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2003/87/EC) Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2003). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
11.
FermosoJAriasBPlazaMGPevidaCRubieraFPisJJ (2009) High pressure co-gasification of coal with biomass and petroleum coke. Fuel Processing Technology90: 926–932.
HabibZParthasarathyRGollahalliS (2010) Performance and emission characteristics of biofuel in a small-scale gas turbine engine. Applied Energy87: 1701–1709.
15.
IDAE (Instituto para la Diversificación y el Ahorro de la Energía) (eds) (2004). Renewable energy plan 2005–2010. Madrid.
16.
IDAE (Instituto para la Diversificación y el Ahorro de la Energía) (eds) (2010). National plan of action for renewable energy 2011–2020. Madrid: Government of Spain.
17.
MARM (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino) (eds) (2006). Intefrated national plan for waste 2007–2015. Technical report. Madrid: Government of Spain.
18.
MAAMA (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Agricultura y Medio Ambiente) (eds) (2007). Yields and costs of different uses of forest biomass. Technical report. Madrid: Government of Spain.
19.
NeilsonCE(1998) LM2500 gas turbine modifications for biomass fuel operation. Biomass and Bioenergy15: 269–273.
20.
NewellRGJaffeABStavinsRN (2006) The effects of economic and policy incentives on carbon mitigation technologies. Energy Economics28: 563–578.
