Feasibility of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in an integrated municipal energy supply and waste management system

Abstract

A decision-support model for determining the feasibility of a planned energy-from-waste (EfW) investment for an integrated waste management and energy supply system is presented. The aim is to present an easy-to-understand, inexpensive and fast-to-use tool to decision-makers for modelling and evaluating different kinds of processes. Special emphasis is put on forming the model and interpretation of the results of the example case. The simple integrated system management (SISMan) model is presented through a practical example of the use of the model. In the example the viability of the described system is studied by comparing five different cases including different waste-derived fuels (WDF), non-segregated municipal solid waste (MSW) being one of the fuel options. The nominal power output of the EfW plant varied in each case according to the WDF classification. The numeric values for two main variables for each WDF type were determined, the WDF price at the gate of the EfW plant and the waste management fee (WMF) according to the `polluter pays' -principle. Comparison between the five cases was carried out according to two determinants, the WMF related to each case and the recovery rate related to each case. The numeric values for the constants and variables used in the calculations were chosen as realistically as possible using available data related to the issue. In the example of this paper, the mass-incineration solution (`pure' MSW as a fuel) was found to be the most viable solution for the described system according to the calculations. However, the final decision of the decision-makers might differ from this in the real world due to extra `fuzzy' information that cannot be reliably included in the calculations. This paper shows that certain key values of modelled systems can be calculated using an easy-to-use tool at the very early stages of a larger design process involving municipal and business partners. The use of this kind of tools could significantly decrease the overall design costs of large systems in the long run by cutting out irrational system options at the very beginning of the planning.

Keywords

Waste management systems energy supply systems waste to energy energy from waste decision-support model wmr 998—5

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abou Najm, M. , El-Fadel, M. , Ayoub, G. , El-Taha, M. & Al-Alwar, F. (2002a) An optimisation model for regional integrated solid waste management I. Model formulation. Waste Management & Research, 20, 37—45.

Abou Najm, M. , El-Fadel, M. , Ayoub, G. , El-Taha, M. & Al-Alwar, F. (2002b) An optimisation model for regional integrated solid waste management II. Model application and sensitivity analyses. Waste Management & Research, 20, 46—54.

Caputo, A.C. & Pelagagge, P.M. (2002a) RDF production plants: I Design and costs. Applied Thermal Engineering, 22, 423—437.

Caputo, A.C. & Pelagagge, P.M. (2002b) RDF production plants: II Economics and profitability. Applied Thermal Engineering , 22, 439—448.

Caputo, A.C. , Palumbo, M. & Scacchia, F. (2004) Perspectives of RDF use in decentralized areas: comparing power and co-generation solutions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 24, 2171—2187.

Denzer, R. (2005) Generic integration of environmental decision support systems — state-of-the-art. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20, 1217—1223.

European Commission (2003) Refuse derived fuel — Current practices and perspectives. Final Report, CO5087-4 . European Commission, Brussels .

European Union (EU) (2000) Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the incineration of waste.

European Union (EU) (2003) Council Directive of July 1975 on waste (75/ 442/EEC). Amended version: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/main/1975/en_1975L0442_index.html .

10.

Holmgren, K. & Henning, D. (2004) Comparison between material and energy recovery of municipal waste from an energy perspective. A study of two Swedish municipalities . Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43, 51—73.

11.

Luoranen, M. & Horttanainen, M. (2006) Co-generation based energy recovery from municipal solid waste integrated with the existing energy supply system. Waste Management, 2007, in press.

12.

Ministry of the Environment (2002) Revised National Waste Plan for the Period up to 2005. Approved by the Finnish Government on 14 August 2002. http://www.google.fi/search?hl=fi&q=national+waste+plan+until+2005&meta=

13.

Olofsson, M. , Sahlin, J. , Ekvall, T. & Sundberg, J. (2005) Driving forces for import of waste for energy recovery in Sweden. Waste Management & Research, 23, 3—12.

14.

Ragossnig, A.M. & Lorber, K.E. (2005) Combined incineration of industrial wastes with in-plant residues in fluidized-bed utility boilers — decision relevant factors. Waste Management & Research, 23, 448—456.

15.

Rotter, S. , Kost.,T. , Winkler, J. & Bilitewski, B. (2004) Material flow analysis of RDF-production processes. Waste Management, 24, 1005—1021.

16.

SFS (Finnish Standards Association) (2000) Standard 5875: Solid Recovered Fuel Quality Control System. SFS.

17.

Tanskanen, J.-H. & Kaila, J. (2001) Comparison of methods used in the collection of source-separated household waste. Waste Management & Research , 19, 486—497.

18.

Tekes (The National Technology Agency of Finland) (2003). Jätteiden energiakäyttö-teknologiaohjelma 1998—2001. Loppuraportti (in Finnish). ISBN 952—457—116—1. ISSN 1239—1339.

19.

Tietze-Stöckinger, I. , Fichtner, W. & Rentz, O. (2004) A model to minimize joint total costs for industrial waste producers and waste management companies. Waste Management & Research, 22, 466—476.