Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE

Abstract

A new model has been developed for evaluating the overall resource consumption and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste management systems by the use of life cycle assessment. The model is named EASEWASTE (Environmental Assessment of Solid Waste Systems and Technologies) and is able to compare different waste management strategies, waste treatment methods and waste process technologies. The potential environmental impacts can be traced back to the most important processes and waste fractions that contribute to the relevant impacts. A model like EASEWASTE can be used by waste planners to optimize current waste management systems with respect to environmental achievements and by authorities to set guidelines and regulations and to evaluate different strategies for handling of waste. The waste hierarchy has for decades been governing waste management but the ranking of handling approaches may not always be the most environmentally friendly. The EASEWASTE model can identify the most environmentally sustainable solution, which may differ among waste materials and regions and can add valuable information about environmental achievements from each process in a solid waste management system.

Keywords

Solid waste solid waste management life cycle assessment environmental system analysis EASEWASTE wmr 854-1

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Björklund, A. , Bjuggren, C. , Dalemo, M. & Sonesson, U. (2000) Planning biodegradable waste management in Stockholm . Research and Analysis, 3(4), 43-58 .

Council of European Communities (1991): Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste. European Commission, Brussels .

Dalemo, M. , Sonesson, U. , Björklund, A. , Mingarini, K. , Frostell, B. , Jönsson, H. , Nybrant, T. , Sundqvist, J.-O. & Thyselius, L. (1997) ORWARE - A simulation model for organic waste handling system . Resources Conservation & Recycling, 21, 17-37 .

Damgaard, C. & Strandmark, L. (2003) Skal husholdningernes madaffald brændes eller genanvendes? Samfundsøkonomisk analyse af øget genanvendelse af organisk dagrenovation. Environmental Project, 814, Danish EPA, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Danish EPA (1995) Miljøøkonomi for papir og papkredsløb. Environmental report, 294, Danish EPA, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Environment Agency (2000) Review of the Environment Agency’s LCA Software Tool “WISARD”. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK .

Erichsen, H. & Hauschild, M. (2000) Technical data for waste incineration - background for modelling of product specific emissions in a LCA context. IPT, DTU, Copenhagen, Denmark .

Finnveden, G. , Johansson, J. , Lind, P. & Moberg, Å. (2000) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste. Forskningsgruppen för mijöstrategiska studier, Stockholm, Sweden .

Grant, T. , James, K.L. & Partl, H. (2003) Life cycle assessment of waste and resource recovery options (including energy from waste). version 1. Ecocycle Victoria, Melbourne, Australia .

10.

Hansen, M.S. & Gilberg, U.M. (2003) Cost-benefit Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment in Environmental Decision-making - Potentials and Limitations. Master thesis, E&R, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.

11.

Hansen, E. (2004) Livscyklusvurdering af deponeret affald. Enviromental Project, 971, Danish EPA, Copenhagen, Denmark.

12.

Hansen, T.L. , Bruun, S. , Christensen, T.H. & Jensen, L.S. (2006) Life-cycle modeling of environmental impacts from application of treated organic urban waste on agricultural soil . Waste Management & Research, in press.

13.

Harrison, K.W. , Dumas, R.D. , Solano, E. , Barlaz, M.A. , Brill, E.D. & Ranjithan, S.R. (2001) Decision support tool for life-cycle-based solid waste management . Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 44-58 .

14.

Hunt, R.G. (1995) Life cycle assessment considerations of solid waste management alternatives for paper and plastics . Resources Conservation & Recycling, 14, 225-231 .

15.

ISO (1998) ISO 14000: Environmental Management. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland .

16.

Kirchmann, H. (1985) Losses, plant uptake and utilization of manure nitrogen during a production cycle. In: Acta Agricultur‘ Scandinavica, Supplementum 24, The Scandinavian Association of Agricultural Scientists and the Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Stockholm .

17.

Kirkeby, J.T. , Birgisdóttir, H. , Hauschild, M. & Christensen, T.H. (2006) Modelling of environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling in a life cycle perspective (EASEWASTE) . Waste Management & Research, submitted.

18.

McDougall, F.R. , White, P. , Francke, M. & Hindle, P. (2001) Integrated Solid Waste Management - A Lifecycle Inventory 2. Procter & Gamble. Blackwell Science Ltd., London, UK .

19.

Petersen, M.L. & Andersen, H.T. (2002) Nyttiggørelse af returpapir. En samfundsøkonomisk analyse. Environmental Assessment Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

20.

Solano, E. , Ranjithan, S.R. , Barlaz, M. & Brill, E.D. (2002) Life-cycle-based solid waste management. 1: Model development . Journal of Environmental Engineering, October 2002.

21.

Vigsø, D. & Andersen, H.T. (2002) Pant på engangsemballage? En samfundsøkonomisk analyse af pantordningen for engangsemballage til øl og vand. Environmental Assessment Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

22.

Wenzel, H. , Hauschild, M. & Alting, L. (1997) Environmental Assessment of Products, Vol.1: Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development. Institute of Product Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham, MA. USA .

23.

White, P. , Francke, M. & Hindle, P. (1995) Integrated Solid Waste Management - A Lifecycle Inventory. Chapman & Hall, London .