Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although criminological theories emphasize both individual and environmental conditions related to adolescent deviance, the interaction between these factors has often been overlooked. To address this research gap, this study examines the interaction between unstructured socializing and low self-control on adolescent deviance using a nationally representative sample from South Korea (N = 10,338). The results reveal that both unstructured socializing and low self-control are significantly associated with adolescent deviance. More importantly, the findings show that adolescents’ self-control significantly moderates the effect of engaging in unstructured socializing on deviance. In other words, unstructured socializing increases the likelihood of engaging in deviant behavior, particularly for adolescents with lower levels of self-control. Thus, variations in adolescents’ self-control can influence the extent of deviant behavior during unstructured socializing. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

unstructured socializing low self-control adolescent deviance interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Roxbury.

Akers

(2017). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Routledge.

Antonaccio

Tittle

C. R.

(2008). Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00118.x

Baron

S. W.

Forde

D. R.

Kay

F. M.

(2007). Self-control, risky lifestyles, and situation: The role of opportunity and context in the general theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.01.001

Barton-Crosby

Hirtenlehner

(2021). The role of morality and self-control in conditioning the criminogenic effect of provocation. A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 42(10), 1273–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1738645

Burt

C. H.

(2020). Self-control and crime: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi's theory. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041344

Chapple

C. L.

(2005). Self-control, peer relations, and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 22(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0741882042000333654

Cho

Wooldredge

(2018). Lifestyles, informal controls, and youth victimization risk in South Korea and the United States. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(4), 1358–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0973-4

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

10.

Cohen

L. E.

Kluegel

J. R.

Land

K. C.

(1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094935

11.

Demuth

Brown

S. L.

(2004). Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: The significance of parental absence versus parental gender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803256236

12.

Desmond

S. A.

Bruce

A. S.

Stacer

M. J.

(2012). Self-control, opportunity, and substance use. Deviant Behavior, 33(6), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2011.584055

13.

Doherty

E. E.

(2006). Self-control, social bonds, and desistance: A test of life-course interdependence. Criminology, 44(4), 807–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00064.x.

14.

Donnellan

M. B.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

Robins

R. W.

Moffitt

T. E.

Caspi

(2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01535.x

15.

DuBois

D. L.

(2021). Mentoring programs for youth: A promising intervention for delinquency prevention. National Institute of Justice Journal, (283), 38–49. https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/mentoring-programs-youth-promising-intervention-delinquency-prevention

16.

Farrington

(1994). Early developmental prevention of juvenile delinquency. RSA Journal, 142(5454), 22–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41376602.

17.

Gerstner

Oberwittler

(2018). Who’s hanging out and what’s happening? A look at the interplay between unstructured socializing, crime propensity and delinquent peers using social network data. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732194

18.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

19.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(2003). Self-control and opportunity. In Britt

C.L.

Gottfredson

M. R.

(Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 5–18). Transaction Publishers.

20.

Grasmick

H. G.

Tittle

C. R.

Bursik

R. J.

Jr Arneklev

B. J.

(1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002

21.

Greenwood

(2008). Prevention and intervention programs for juvenile offenders. The Future of Children, 18(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0018

22.

Hay

Forrest

(2008). Self-control theory and the concept of opportunity: The case for a more systematic union. Criminology, 46(4), 1039–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00135.x.

23.

Hay

Meldrum

(2015). Self-control and crime over the life course. Sage Publications.

24.

Haynie

D. L.

Osgood

D. W.

(2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0018

25.

Higgins

G. E.

Jennings

W. G.

(2010). Is unstructured socializing a dynamic process? An exploratory analysis using a semiparametric group-based modeling approach. Criminal Justice Review, 35(4), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016810377351

26.

Hilbe

J. M.

(2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973420

27.

Hirschi

(2017). Causes and prevention of juvenile delinquency. In The craft of criminology (pp. 105–120). Routledge.

28.

Hirtenlehner

Bacher

Leitgöb

Schartmueller

(2022). Do morality and self-control protect from criminogenic peer influence? Testing multidimensional person–environment interactions. Justice Quarterly, 39(1), 78–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1903069

29.

Hirtenlehner

Pauwels

Mesko

(2015). Is the criminogenic effect of exposure to peer delinquency dependent on the ability to exercise self-control? Results from three countries. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.05.006

30.

Hoeben

Weerman

(2014). Situational conditions and adolescent offending: Does the impact of unstructured socializing depend on its location? European Journal of Criminology, 11(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813509346

31.

Hoeben

E. M.

Meldrum

R. C.

Walker

D. A.

Young

J. T.

(2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.08.001

32.

Hoeben

E. M.

Weerman

F. M.

(2016). Why is involvement in unstructured socializing related to adolescent delinquency? Criminology, 54(2), 242–281.

33.

Hoffmann

J. P.

(2023). Family structure, unstructured socializing, and delinquent behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 87(1), 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102086

34.

Hong

J. S.

Kim

D. H.

Piquero

A. R.

(2017). Assessing the links between punitive parenting, peer deviance, social isolation and bullying perpetration and victimization in South Korean adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.017

35.

Huey

S. J.

Henggeler

S. W.

(2001). Effective community-based interventions for antisocial and delinquent adolescents. In Handbook of psychological services for children and adolescents (pp. 301–322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

36.

Hwang

Akers

R. L.

(2006). Parental and peer influences on adolescent drug use in Korea. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-006-9009-5

37.

Jeon

Noh

(2018). Korean Crime Victim Survey (VII): Juvenile Victimization in 2017. Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice.

38.

(2015). Stability of self-control: Hirschi’s redefined self-control. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13501839

39.

Zhang

(2014). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: Examining the applicability of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime to South Korean youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(11), 1340–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13494670

40.

Karaca-Mandic

Norton

E. C.

Dowd

(2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47(1 Pt 1), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x

41.

Keith

T. Z.

(2019). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. Routledge.

42.

Kim

Lee

(2022). Developmental trajectories and predictors of delinquent peer association. Deviant Behavior, 43(12), 1523–1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1996214

43.

Kroneberg

Schulz

(2018). Revisiting the role of self-control in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732189

44.

Kubrin

C. E.

Stucky

T. D.

Krohn

M. D.

(2009). Researching theories of crime and deviance. Oxford University Press.

45.

Kwak

Kim

E. K.

(2022). The role of low self-control and risky lifestyles in criminal victimization: A study of adolescents in South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811500

46.

LaGrange

T. C.

Silverman

R. A.

(1999). Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology, 37(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00479.x

47.

Leimberg

Lehmann

P. S.

(2022). Unstructured socializing with peers, low self-control, and substance use. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20967939

48.

Mahoney

J. L.

Stattin

(2000). Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal of Adolescence, 23(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0302

49.

Maimon

Browning

C. R.

(2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology, 48(2), 443–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00192.x

50.

Manly

B. F.

(2011). Bootstrapping with models for count data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 21(6), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2011.607748

51.

Marcus

(2004). Self-control in the general theory of crime: Theoretical implications of a measurement problem. Theoretical Criminology, 8(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604039740

52.

McGloin

J. M.

(2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47(2), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00146.x

53.

McGloin

J. M.

Thomas

K. J.

(2019). Peer influence and delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024551

54.

Meldrum

R. C.

Clark

(2015). Adolescent virtual time spent socializing with peers, substance use, and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 61(8), 1104–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713492499

55.

Miller

(2013). Individual offending, routine activities, and activity settings: Revisiting the routine activity theory of general deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(3), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811432641

56.

Moffitt

T. E.

(1993). The neuropsychology of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5(1-2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004302

57.

Nagin

D. S.

Paternoster

(1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27(3), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054102

58.

Osgood

D. W.

(2023). Delinquency, unstructured socializing, and social change: The rise and fall of a teen culture of independence. Criminology, 61(4), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12358.

59.

Osgood

D. W.

(2017). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. In Quantitative methods in criminology (pp. 577–599). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315089256-23

60.

Osgood

D. W.

Anderson

A. L.

(2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42(3), 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00528.x

61.

Osgood

D. W.

Wilson

J. K.

O'malley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Johnston

L. D.

(1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397

62.

Piquero

Tibbetts

(1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093061

63.

Piquero

A. R.

(2009). Self-control theory: Research issues. In Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 153–168). New York, NY: Springer.

64.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

Farrington

D. P.

Diamond

Gonzalez

J. M. R.

(2016). A meta-analysis update on the effectiveness of early self-control improvement programs to improve self-control and reduce delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9257-z

65.

Pogarsky

(2004). Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00515.x

66.

Pratt

T. C.

(2016). A self-control/life-course theory of criminal behavior. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815587771

67.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

(2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x

68.

Schielzeth

(2010). Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x

69.

Shader

(2001). Risk factors for delinquency: An overview. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

70.

Shilane

Evans

S. N.

Hubbard

A. E.

(2010). Confidence intervals for negative binomial random variables of high dispersion. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1164

71.

Shrestha

(2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1

72.

Smith

C. A.

Ireland

T. O.

Thornberry

T. P.

(2005). Adolescent maltreatment and its impact on young adult antisocial behavior. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(10), 1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.02.011

73.

Sullivan

C. J.

Jolliffe

(2012). Peer influence, mentoring, and the prevention of crime. In The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 207–225). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

74.

Svensson

Oberwittler

(2010). It’s not the time they spend, it’s what they do: The interaction between delinquent friends and unstructured routine activity on delinquency: Findings from two countries. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1006–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.002

75.

Sweeten

(2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9160-8

76.

Thomas

K. J.

Marie McGloin

(2013). A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51(2), 435–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12010.

77.

Thornberry

T. P.

Krohn

M. D.

(2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In Duffee

(Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (Vol. 4, pp. 33–83). Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

78.

Thornberry

T. P.

Krohn

M. D.

Thornberry

T. P.

Lizotte

A. J.

Krohn

M. D.

Smith

C. A.

Porter

P. K.

(2003). Causes and consequences of delinquency: Findings from the Rochester youth development study. In Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 11–46). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

79.

Vazsonyi

A. T.

Mikuška

Kelley

E. L.

(2017). It's time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.10.001

80.

Ward

J. T.

Forney

(2020). Unpacking within-and between-person effects of unstructured socializing and differential association on solo-and co-offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70(1), 101720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101720

81.

Warr

(2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press.

82.

Weerman

F. M.

Bernasco

Bruinsma

G. J.

Pauwels

L. J.

(2015). When is spending time with peers related to delinquency? The importance of where, what, and with whom. Crime & Delinquency, 61(10), 1386–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713478129

83.

Wikström

P.-O.

(2010). Explaining crime as moral action. In Hitlin

Vaisey

(Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 211–240). Springer.

84.

Wikström

P. O. H.

(2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people's urban crime. Oxford University Press.

85.

Wikström

P. O. H.

(2014). Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In Manzo

(Ed.), Analytical sociology: Actions and networks (pp. 71–94). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118762707.ch03

86.

Wikström

P. O. H.

Oberwittler

Treiber

Hardie

(2017). Situational action theory. In Developmental and life-course criminological theories (pp. 125–170). Routledge.

87.

Wilcox

Cullen

F. T.

(2018). Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092421

88.

Yun

Kim

S. G.

Kwon

(2016). Low self-control among South Korean adolescents: A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s generality hypothesis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(10), 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15574683

89.

Yun

Walsh

(2011). The stability of self-control among South Korean adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09358072

Incorporating Opportunity and Individual Risk Perspectives on Adolescent Deviance: The Interactive Effect of Unstructured Socializing and Low Self-Control

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References