Extant research demonstrates that offending and victim populations overlap to some degree, suggesting that a common underlying factor partially explains both outcomes. The current study tests whether low self-control explains the overlap in fraud offending and victimization exposure. Using cross-sectional survey data from a sample of undergraduate students (N = 305), the results from the regression models show that low self-control is associated with fraud offending. The findings also show that individuals with lower levels of self-control report that they are more likely to behave in ways that elevate their exposure to fraud victimization. Finally, in the fraud offending—victimization exposure multivariate models, the partial regression coefficient for low self-control is positive and statistically significant. In short, the findings demonstrate that the overlap between fraud offending and victimization exposure is partially explained by low self-control.
Anderson, K.B. ( 2004). Consumer fraud in the United States: An FTC survey . Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
2.
Baker, W., & Faulkner, R.R. (2003). Diffusion of fraud: Intermediate economic crime and investor dynamics. Criminology, 41, 1601-1634.
3.
Baumeister, R.F. ( 2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research , 28, 670-676.
4.
Benson, M.L., & Moore, E. ( 1992). Are white-collar and common offenders the same? An empirical and theoretical critique of a recently proposed general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 251-272.
5.
Blanco, C., Grant, J., Petry, N.M., Simpson, H.B., Alegria, A., Liu, S.M., et al. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of shoplifting in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). American Journal of Psychiatry , 165, 905-913.
6.
Blankenship, K.L., & Whitley, B.E. ( 2000). Relation of general deviance to academic dishonesty . Ethics & Behavior, 10, 1-12.
7.
Bolin, A.U. ( 2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. Journal of Psychology , 138, 101-114.
8.
Cochran, J.K., Wood, P.B., Sellers, C.S., Wilkerson, W., & Chamlin, M.B. ( 1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 19, 227-255.
9.
Fagan, A.A., & Mazerolle, P. (in press). Repeat offending and repeat victimization: Assessing similarities and differences in psychosocial risk factors. Crime and Delinquency .
10.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Forde, D.R., & Kennedy, L.W. ( 1997). Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14, 265-294.
12.
Gmel, G. ( 2001). Imputation of missing values in the case of a multiple item instrument measuring alcohol consumption. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2369-2381.
13.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. ( 1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J., & Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
15.
Green, D. ( 1989). Measures of illegal behavior in individual-level deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 26, 253-275.
16.
Herbert, C., Green, G.S., & Larrogoite, V. (1998). Clarifying the reach of a general theory of crime for organizational offending: A comment on Reed and Yeager. Criminology, 36, 867-883.
17.
Higgins, G.E. ( 2007). Examining the original Grasmick scale: A Rasch model approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 157-178.
18.
Holtfreter, K. ( 2005). Is occupational fraud "typical" white-collar crime? A comparison of individual and organizational characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 353-365.
19.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M.D., & Pratt, T.C. ( 2008). Low self-control, routine activities, and fraud victimization . Criminology, 46, 189-220.
20.
Jensen, G.F., & Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity. Violence and Victims , 1, 143-165.
21.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
22.
Kim, M., & Hunter, J. ( 1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, Part 2. Communications Research, 20, 331-364.
23.
Langton, L., Piquero, N.L., & Hollinger, R. ( 2006). An empirical test of the relationship between low self-control and employee theft. Deviant Behavior, 27, 537-565.
24.
Lauritsen, J.L., Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. ( 1991). The link between offending and victimization among adolescents . Criminology, 29, 265-292.
25.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J.A. ( 1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
26.
Marenin, O., & Reisig, M.D. ( 1995). A general theory of crime and patterns of crime in Nigeria: An exploration of methodological assumptions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 501-518.
27.
Martinez, J.A., Rutledge, P.C., & Sher, K.J. ( 2007). Fake ID ownership and heavy drinking in underage college students: Prospective findings. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors , 21, 226-232.
28.
Nagin, D.S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review , 27, 467-496.
29.
Payne, B.K., & Chappell, A. ( 2008). Using student samples in criminological research . Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 175-192.
30.
Perrone, D., Sullivan, C., Pratt, T.C., & Margaryan, S. ( 2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquent behavior: A test of a general theory of crime on a nationally-representative sample . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 298-312.
31.
Piquero, A.R., & Bouffard, J.A. (2007). Something old, something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control . Justice Quarterly, 24, 1-27.
32.
Piquero, A.R., MacDonald, J., Dobrin, A., Daigle, L.E., & Cullen, F.T. ( 2005). Self-control, violent offending, and homicide victimization . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 55-72.
33.
Piquero, A.R., & Tibbetts, S.G. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision-making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
34.
Pogarsky, G. ( 2004). Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42, 111-136.
35.
Pratt, T.C., & Cullen, F.T. ( 2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
36.
Reed, G.E., & Yeager, P.C. ( 1996). Organizational offending and neoclassical criminology: Challenging the reach of a general theory of crime. Criminology , 34, 357-382.
37.
Reisig, M.D., Pratt, T.C., & Holtfreter, K. (2009). Perceived risk of Internet theft victimization: Examining the effects of social vulnerability and financial impulsivity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 369-384.
38.
Romal, J.B., & Kaplan, B.J. ( 1995). Differences in self-control among spenders and savers . Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior , 32, 8-17.
39.
Schreck, C.J. ( 1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly , 16, 633-654.
40.
Schreck, C.J., Stewart, E.A., & Osgood, D.W. ( 2008). A reappraisal of the overlap of violent offenders and victims. Criminology, 46, 871-906.
41.
Schreck, C.J., Wright, R.A., & Miller, J.M. ( 2002). A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization. Justice Quarterly, 19, 159-180.
42.
Shaffer, J.N., & Ruback, R.B. ( 2002). Violent victimization as a risk factor for violent offending among juveniles. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
43.
Shover, N., Coffey, G.S., & Hobbs, D. ( 2003). Crime on the line: Telemarketing fraud and the changing nature of professional crime. British Journal of Criminology , 43, 489-505.
Simpson, S.S., & Piquero, N.L. ( 2002). Low self-control, organizational theory, and corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 36, 509-547.
46.
Smith, T.R. ( 2004). Low self-control, staged opportunity, and subsequent fraudulent behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 542-563.
47.
Stewart, E.A., Elifson, K.W., & Sterk, C.E. ( 2004). Integrating the general theory of crime into an explanation of violent victimization among female offenders. Justice Quarterly , 21, 159-181.
48.
Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., & Boone, A.L. ( 2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality , 72, 271-324.
49.
Tibbetts, S.G., & Myers, D.L. ( 1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating . American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 179-200.
50.
Titus, R. ( 2001). Personal fraud and its victims. In N. Shover & J. P. Wright (Eds.), Crimes of privilege: Readings in white-collar crime (pp. 57-67). New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
Trahan, A., Marquart, J.W., & Mullings, J. ( 2005). Fraud and the American dream: Toward an understanding of fraud victimization. Deviant Behavior, 26, 601-620.
52.
United States Department of Justice. (2007 ). Financial crimes report to the public: Fiscal year 2006 . Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.
53.
Unnever, J.D., Cullen, F.T., & Pratt, T.C. ( 2003). Parental management, ADHD, and delinquent involvement: Reassessing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Justice Quarterly, 20, 471-500.
54.
Vowell, P.R., & Chen, J. ( 2004). Predicting academic misconduct: A comparative test of four sociological explanations. Sociological Inquiry , 74, 226-249.
