There is limited research which has examined the developmental nature of friendships and their relevance for offending. This study examined heterogeneity in the development of justice system-involved friendship proportionality and its relevance for predicting offending continuity in emerging adulthood. Having a greater proportion of such peers within a friendship collective as individuals exit adolescence may lead to continued risk of offending in adulthood. The Pathways to Desistance data were used in analyses. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify developmental patterns of justice system-involved friendship proportionality during adolescence and emerging adulthood. Logistic regression was used to assess the relevance of trajectory group assignment for predicting offending risk in emerging adulthood. Findings indicated that a six-group trajectory model best fit the data. All other trajectory groups in the model indicated a lower risk of offending in emerging adulthood than the High Chronic justice system-involved friendship proportionality group. Sensitivity analyses indicated that separation from criminal peers following adolescence may be a more conservative predictor of offending risk in emerging adulthood.
AaltonenM.KivivuoriJ.MartikainenP.SirénR. (2012). Socioeconomic differences in violent victimization: Exploring the impact of data source and the inclusivity of the violence concept. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811422800
2.
AkersR. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
3.
AlwinD. F., (2018). In FelmleeD. H.KreagerD. A. (Eds.), Social networks and the life course: Integrating the development of human lives and social relational networks (Vol. 2). New York City, NY: Springer.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Baskin-SommersA. R.BaskinD. (2016). Psychopathic traits mediate the relationship between exposure to violence and violent juvenile offending. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9535-0
7.
Boman IVJ. H.MowenT. J. (2018). Same feathers, different flocks: Breaking down the meaning of ‘behavioral Homophily’in the etiology of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.12.003
8.
BroidyL. M.StewartA. L.ThompsonC. M.ChrzanowskiA.AllardT.DennisonS. M. (2015). Life course offending pathways across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(2), 118–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0008-z
ChanH. C. (2019). Violent offending, nonviolent offending, and general delinquency: Exploring the criminogenic risk factors of Hong Kong male and female adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(9), 975–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19881917
11.
CihanA.SorensenJ.ChismK. A. (2017). Analyzing the offending activity of inmates: Trajectories of offense seriousness, escalation, and de-escalation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.001
12.
CutrínO.ManeiroL.SobralJ.Gómez-FraguelaJ. A. (2018). Longitudinal effects of parenting mediated by deviant peers on violent and non-violent antisocial behaviour and substance use in adolescence. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018a12
13.
FabioA.TuL. C.LoeberR.CohenJ. (2011). Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and the shape of the age–crime curve. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), S325–S332. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.300034
14.
GrahamJ. W.OlchowskiA. E.GilreathT. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8(3), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
15.
HaynieD. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015227414929
16.
HenryD. B.KobusK.SchoenyM. E. (2011). Accuracy and bias in adolescents’ perceptions of friends’ substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021874
17.
HigginsG. E.MakinD. A. (2004). Self-control, deviant peers, and software piracy. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.95.3.921-931
18.
HollingsheadA. B. (1957). Two Factor Index of Social Position. New York City, NY: Mimeo.
19.
KimJ.BushwayS. D. (2018). Using longitudinal self-report data to study the age–crime relationship. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(2), 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9338-9
20.
KirkD. S.SampsonR. J. (2013). Juvenile arrest and collateral educational damage in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712448862
21.
KrohnM. D.GibsonC. L.ThornberryT. P. (2013). Under the protective bud the bloom awaits: A review of theory and research on adult-onset and late-blooming offenders. Handbook of Life-Course Criminology, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5113-6_11
22.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x
23.
LauritsenJ. L. (2005). Racial and ethnic differences in juvenile offending. Our Children, Their Children: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Differences in American Juvenile Justice, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226319919.003.0003
24.
Le BlancM. (2020). On the future of the individual longitudinal age-crime curve. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 30(4), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2159
25.
LussierP.McCuishE.CorradoR. R. (2015). The adolescence–adulthood transition and desistance from crime: Examining the underlying structure of desistance. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(2), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0007-0
26.
MassogliaM.UggenC. (2010). Settling down and aging out: Toward an interactionist theory of desistance and the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 543–582. https://doi.org/10.1086/653835
27.
MatthewsB.MintonJ. (2018). Rethinking one of criminology’s ‘brute facts’: The age–crime curve and the crime drop in Scotland. European Journal of Criminology, 15(3), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817731706
28.
McGloinJ. M.SullivanC. J.ThomasK. J. (2014). Peer influence and context: The interdependence of friendship groups, schoolmates and network density in predicting substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1436–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0126-7
29.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
30.
MowenT. J.Boman IVJ. H. (2018). The duality of the peer effect: The interplay between peer support and peer criminality on offending and substance use during reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 64(8), 1094–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717740529
31.
NaginD. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press.
PetkovsekM. A.BoutwellB. B.BarnesJ. C.BeaverK. M. (2016). Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy and gang membership: An alternative test of the snares hypothesis. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204015581389
35.
PetrichD. M.SullivanC. J. (2020). Does future orientation moderate the relationship between impulse control and offending? Insights from a sample of serious young offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(2), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204019876976
36.
PrinsteinM. J.WangS. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: Examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3566-4
37.
RebellonC. J.ModeckiK. L. (2014). Accounting for projection bias in models of delinquent peer influence: The utility and limits of latent variable approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-013-9199-9
38.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1995). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Selner-OhaganM.KindlonD.BukaS.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1998). Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00315
40.
SutherlandE. H.CresseyD. R. (1960). A theory of differential association. In CullenF. T. (Ed.), Criminological theory: Past to present (pp. 131–133). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Co.
41.
TestaA.SemenzaD. (2020). Criminal offending and health over the life-course: A dual-trajectory approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 68, 101691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101691
42.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(47), 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x
43.
ToroP. A.UrbergK. A.HeinzeH. J. (2004). Antisocial behavior and affiliation with deviant peers. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3302_15
44.
WaltersG. D. (2020). Mediating the victim–offender overlap with delinquent peer associations: A preliminary test of the person proximity hypothesis. Criminal Justice Studies, 33(4), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2020.1711752
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WeinbergerD. A.FeldmanS. S.FordM. E.ChastainR. L. (1987). Construct validity of the Weinberger adjustment inventory. Unpublished manuscript.
48.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2020). PTSD as a risk factor for the development of violence among juvenile offenders: A group-based trajectory modeling approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(13-14), 2511–2535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517704231
49.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2018a). The development of deviant peer association across the life-course and its relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-017-0072-7
50.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2018b). The interaction between the development of deviant peer influence and resistance to peer influence: Relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(3), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-018-0086-9
51.
YimH. N. (2020). The differential relationship between self-control and peer influences over time: Toward an integrative model of offending using a dual-systems approach. Crime & Delinquency, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720977448
52.
YoonD.YoonS.YoonM.SnyderS. M. (2019). Developmental trajectories of deviant peer affiliation in adolescence: Associations with types of child maltreatment and substance use. Children and Youth Services Review, 105, 104446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104446
53.
YoungJ. T.RebellonC. J.BarnesJ. C.WeermanF. M. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12029
54.
YoungJ. T.WeermanF. M. (2013). Delinquency as a consequence of misperception: Overestimation of friends’ delinquent behavior and mechanisms of social influence. Social Problems, 60(3), 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.3.334
