Illicit drug sales present a public health issue that results in proliferation of drug use–related problems, like overdose deaths, stemming from use of illicit drugs. However, there remain gaps in understanding of psychosocial and developmental processes involved with predicting drug sales. Deviant peer association presents one potential risk factor for selling drugs and this relationship may be age-graded. This study examined deviant peer association as a predictor of risk for selling drugs and investigated whether salience of this relationship depended on when exposure to deviant peers occurred. The Pathways to Desistance data were analyzed. Mixed effects logistic regression models were utilized to examine the effects of deviant peer association on odds of selling illicit drugs and cross-level interactions with age variables. Findings indicated that association with deviant peers increased odds of selling illicit drugs. This relationship diminished as participants aged through adolescence, but later increased in magnitude as participants aged.
AkersR. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
2.
ArterberryB. J.BoydC. J.WestB. T.SchepisT. S.McCabeS. E. (2020). DSM-5 substance use disorders among college-age young adults in the United States: Prevalence, remission and treatment. Journal of American College Health, 68(6), 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1590368
3.
BaglivioM. T.EppsN.SwartzK.HuqM. S.SheerA.HardtN. S. (2014). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(2), 1–17.
4.
BensonB. L. (2009). Escalating the war on drugs: Causes and unintended consequences. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 20, 293.
5.
BrownsbergerW. N. (2000). Race matters: Disproportionality of incarceration for drug dealing in Massachusetts. Journal of Drug Issues, 30(2), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260003000207
6.
ChinG. J. (2002). Race, the war on drugs, and the collateral consequences of criminal conviction. The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 6, 253.
7.
CoomberR.MoyleL. (2014). Beyond drug dealing: Developing and extending the concept of ‘social supply’ of illicit drugs to ‘minimally commercial supply’. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2013.798265
8.
EitleD.EitleT. M. (2015). Factors associated with American Indian and white adolescent drug selling in rural communities. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(2), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.09.003
9.
FlomL.FriedmanS.R.JoseB.CurtisR.P. (2001). Peer norms regarding drug use and drug selling among household youth in a low-income’drug supermarket’urban neighborhood. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 8(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630124478
10.
FloydL. J.AlexandreP. K.HeddenS. L.LawsonA. L.LatimerW. W.GilesN.III (2010). Adolescent drug dealing and race/ethnicity: A population-based study of the differential impact of substance use on involvement in drug trade. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952991003587469
11.
FoxK. A.NoblesM. R.AkersR. L. (2011). Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.10.002
12.
GrossmanJ. B.TierneyJ. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the big brothers big sisters program. Evaluation Review22(3), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9802200304
13.
HallW. D.LynskeyM. (2005). Is cannabis a gateway drug? Testing hypotheses about the relationship between cannabis use and the use of other illicit drugs. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230500126698
14.
HollingsheadA. B. (1957). Two factor index of social position. New Haven, CT: Mimeo, Yale University.
15.
JanikP.KosticovaM.PecenakJ.TurcekM. (2017). Categorization of psychoactive substances into “hard drugs” and “soft drugs”: A critical review of terminology used in current scientific literature. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 43(6), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2017.1335736
16.
KruisN. E.SeoC.KimB. (2020). Revisiting the empirical status of social learning theory on substance use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(4), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1696821
17.
LewerD.FreerJ.KingE.LarneyS.DegenhardtL.TweedE. J.MorleyK. I. (2020). Frequency of health‐care utilization by adults who use illicit drugs: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Addiction, 115(6), 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14892
18.
LittleM.SteinbergL. (2006). Psychosocial correlates of adolescent drug dealing in the inner city: Potential roles of opportunity, conventional commitments, and maturity. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806291260
19.
LoeberR.JenningsW. G.AhonenL.PiqueroA. R.FarringtonD. P. (2017). The Pittsburgh girls study and the prevalence of self-reported delinquency. In Female Delinquency from childhood to young adulthood (pp. 5–11). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48030-5_2
20.
MackK. A.JonesC. M.BallesterosM. F. (2017). Illicit drug use, illicit drug use disorders, and drug overdose deaths in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas—United States. American Journal of Transplantation, 17(12), 3241–3252. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14555
21.
McCuishE. C. (2017). Substance use profiles among juvenile offenders: A lifestyles theoretical perspective. Journal of Drug Issues, 47(3), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042617699197
22.
MendezL.CromerK. D.VillodasM. T. (2019). Pathways to drug delinquency among adolescents at high risk for victimization. Psychology of violence, 9(6), 623. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000230
MoffittT.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100(4), 674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674
25.
OttenR.MunC. J.DishionT. J. (2017). The social exigencies of the gateway progression to the use of illicit drugs from adolescence into adulthood. Addictive Behaviors, 73, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.011
26.
ParkerH.MeashamF. (1994). Pick ‘n’mix: Changing patterns of illicit drug use amongst 1990s adolescents. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 1(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687639409028531
27.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.Thomas WinfreeL.JrMadensenT. D.DaigleL. E.GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903379610
28.
PrinzR. J.KernsS. E. (2003). Early substance use by juvenile offenders. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 33(4), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023030428491
29.
QuintanaP.VenturaM.GrifellM.PalmaA.GalindoL.FornísI.TorrensM. (2017). The hidden web and the fentanyl problem: Detection of ocfentanil as an adulterant in heroin. International Journal of Drug Policy, 40, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.006
30.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1995). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.
31.
ShookJ. J.VaughnM.GoodkindS.JohnsonH. (2011). An empirical portrait of youthful offenders who sell drugs. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.02.014
32.
ShookJ. J.VaughnM. G.Salas-WrightC. P. (2013). Exploring the variation in drug selling among adolescents in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.07.008
33.
SinghV. M.BrowneT.MontgomeryJ. (2020). The emerging role of toxic adulterants in street drugs in the US illicit opioid crisis. Public Health Reports, 135(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354919887741
34.
TaylorM.PotterG. R. (2013). From “Social Supply” to “Real Dealing” drift, friendship, and trust in drug-dealing careers. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(4), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612474974
35.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32: 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x
36.
TolanP. H.HenryD. B.SchoenyM. S.LovegroveP.NicholsE. (2014). Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology10(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9181-4
37.
VasilenkoS. A.Evans-PolceR. J.LanzaS. T. (2017). Age trends in rates of substance use disorders across ages 18–90: Differences by gender and race/ethnicity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 180, 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.027
38.
VaughnM. G.AbiNaderM. A.Salas-WrightC. P.OhS.HolzerK. J. (2018). Declining trends in drug dealing among adolescents in the United States. Addictive Behaviors, 84, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.04.006
39.
VogelM. (2012). Impulsivity, criminogenic opportunity structures, and delinquency. Albany, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
WarrM. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
WeinbergerD. A.FeldmanS. S.FordM. E.ChastainR. L. (1987). Construct validity of the Weinberger adjustment inventory. Unpublished manuscript.
43.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2018). The development of deviant peer association across the life-course and its relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-017-0072-7
44.
WojciechowskiT. (2021). A life-course approach to understanding differential relevance of deviant peers for predicting cocaine/crack Use. Crime & Delinquency, 67(12), 2114–2134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720978717
